| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 4379 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Marathon Nextgen Reality and Textiles Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 444379]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
V. Rayappan vs Presiding Officer, Labour Court and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 442292]
|
HC (Madras) |
2011 |
Municipal Workers Union vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 442172]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2011 |
Punjab Petroleum Transporter and Tanker Workers Union vs Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd., and Ministry of Petroleum
[LexDoc Id : 425556]
|
MISC |
2011 |
EMGEE Greens Co-op. Housing Society vs Mudhit Gupta, EMGEE Development and Consultant, Hariraj Family Trust, SPV Family Trust and Ashiana Family Trust
[LexDoc Id : 425512]
|
MISC |
2011 |
Taurian Iron and Steel Co. (P) Ltd. vs Addl. CIT
ACIT vs Taurian Iron and Steel Co. (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 425047]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
CIT vs EHPT India (P) Ltd.
Special Deductions STP & Non STP Units-Apportionment of expenses - Method of apportionment
Rule of consistency-Ay- 2001-02,02-03. The assessee had two units, one of which was an STP unit. The assessee adopted head count method to apportion indirect expense betw [LexDoc Id : 424456]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
C.C.L. Products India Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 421521]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2011 |
CIT vs Aks Alloys (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 421265]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2011 |
Cadila Healthcare Ltd. vs ACIT and Anr.
Validity of: Re-asstt.-Re-opening on insistence of Audit - Party-A.Y. 2004-05.
A re-opening based only on opinion of audit party and that too beyond 4 years was invalid.
The point raised by audit party was [LexDoc Id : 421236]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2011 |
CIT vs E.H.P.T. India (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 420922]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
CIT vs Vizag District Milk Producers Co-op. Union Ltd.
Manufacture or Production-Making - Milk Products-A.Y. 1983-84.
The making of milk products from milk was "production" or 'manufacture' of an article. The assessee making products like 'ghee', fl [LexDoc Id : 449607]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2011 |
Executive Engineer, HP PWD and Anr. vs Bhagat Ram and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 442282]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2011 |
Shirkar Hotel (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 428690]
|
ITAT |
2011 |
CIT vs Firma Hi-Tech
Investment allowance-Machinery used for job-work-A.Y. 1983-1984 to 1984-1985. The investment allowance could be claimed for the machinery used to do job-work.
S.32A(1) of the Income Tax Act, 196 [LexDoc Id : 427684]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2011 |
Magma Fincorp Ltd. and KKR Mauritius Direct Investments India Ltd., In re
[LexDoc Id : 425721]
|
MISC |
2011 |
Siemens VAI Metals Technologies (P) Ltd., Morgan Construction Co. India (P) Ltd. and Siemens Ltd., In re
[LexDoc Id : 425553]
|
MISC |
2011 |
Shirkar Hotel (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 423874]
|
ITAT |
2011 |
CIT vs J. Chelladurai
[LexDoc Id : 423295]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2011 |
Rastra Sahayak Vidhyalaya Samiti vs Chief CIT and Ors.
Approval of educational institution-Natural justice-The CCIT refused approval by relying on some adverse material. The said material was not confronted to the assessee. The principle of natural justice [LexDoc Id : 423166]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2011 |
CIT vs Radhe Developers
Housing project-Ownership vis-à-vis Development Agreement
Developer v. work- contractor-The ownership of property was not a necessary condition for grant of deduction u/s 80-IB (10).
The assessee entered into a development agreement [LexDoc Id : 422519]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2011 |
Sompal Gupta vs CIT
[LexDoc Id : 421589]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2011 |
DIT vs Vallam M.D. Seshadri Trust
[LexDoc Id : 421481]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2011 |
T.V.S. Berg Ltd. vs CIT
Technical Services rendered to Non-resident-Services rendered thru Sub-contractors-A.Y. 1993-94, 1994-95.
To be entitled to relief u/s 80-O, it was not necessary that these were rendered personally by the assessee. These could b [LexDoc Id : 421480]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2011 |
CIT vs Jet Life India Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 421055]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
