| First | Prev | 151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 3826 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Rajinder Mohan Lal vs DCIT
Deemed income-Gifts/shaguns received from NRIs, on: daughter's marriage-Ay- 2007-08. The assessee received certain amounts as gifts / shaguns from certain NRIs at time of marriage of his daughter, exceeding Rs. 50, 000 in [LexDoc Id : 424996]
|
ITAT (Chandigarh) |
2012 |
Demag Cranes and Components India (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
Determination of ALP-Working capital – effect of-Ay- 2006-07. The working capital employed is a factor that effect the price in an open market. Thus, proper adjustment for this had to be made to arri [LexDoc Id : 424984]
|
ITAT (Pune) |
2012 |
DCIT vs Binaguri Tea Co. (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 424324]
|
ITAT (Calcutta) |
2012 |
CIT vs Tube Investments of India Ltd.
Deduction on actual payment-Interest payable by sick-co.-A.Y. 1990-91, 92-93. The assessee took over a sick co. under a rehabilitation scheme. The interest payable by sick co. was deductible.
S. 43B of [LexDoc Id : 422834]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2012 |
DIT vs Rio Tinto Technical Services
Computation of PE’s income-Expenses as per I.T.Act, 1961-Ay- 99-2000 to 2001-02. The profits of PE in India of a non-residents was to be computed after allowing expenses as per I.T.Act.
S. 9(1) of the [LexDoc Id : 421719]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2012 |
CIT vs Raj Kumar Mahajan
Validity of: re-asstt-Change of opinion-Recomputation of special deduction-Ay- 2001-02. In original asstt the deductions u/s 80-IA and 80HHC were allowed after considering assessee’s replies and evidence filed. The notice iss [LexDoc Id : 421717]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2012 |
DCIT vs Shrikant Rathi
[LexDoc Id : 457088]
|
ITAT (Indore) |
2012 |
Karnataka State Road Transport Corpn. vs H. Haitha
[LexDoc Id : 442279]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2012 |
Sanjay Kumar Gupta vs DLF Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 437271]
|
MISC |
2012 |
Vinod Prakash Saxena vs UOI
Question of fact-Whose income - Unaccounted Investment-Block-period: 1986-87 to 5.9.1995.
The assessee had pleaded that certain investments found during search belonged to his relatives. This was nega [LexDoc Id : 435331]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2012 |
Vinod Kumar Jain vs Punjab and Sind Bank and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 434790]
|
DRAT (Delhi) |
2012 |
CIT vs Artos Breweries Ltd.
Business expenditure-Royalty for use of know-low - Use of brand name 83-84 to 88-89-The royalty paid for use of know-how and brand name was business expenditure.
S. 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. [LexDoc Id : 426972]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2012 |
Priya vs Indian Overseas Bank
Enforcement of security interest: Challenge to notice bringing movables of tenant for sale-Movables not the subject matter of security for borrowal from bank, Tenant not a guarantor for repayment of loan, No right of bank to recover loan from tenant, Direction to bank to handover movables to tenant-The petitioner was a tenant in the property belonging to the second respondent, who had purchased that property from a person for repayment under the [LexDoc Id : 425983]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2012 |
CIT and Anr. vs Infosys Technologies Ltd. (No. 1)
Limitation : Revision by CIT-Two years limitation-A.Y. 1994-95. The asstt order was passed on 27.2.1997. The order u/s 263 made on 20.2.2011 was time-barred.
S. 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. [LexDoc Id : 425898]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2012 |
CIT vs V. Subbaraju
Capital Receipt-Interest on reward for acquisition of land, till date of reward-The assessee's land was acquired by Govt on 31.10.1988. The award under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was made on 29.3.1992. The interest-paid for the pe [LexDoc Id : 425608]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2012 |
Vinod Bhatnagar and Ors. vs Sohan Singh and Ors.
Tarlochan Singh vs Amarjeet Singh
[LexDoc Id : 421819]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2012 |
CIT vs Visual Technologies India (P) Ltd.
Special deduction-Rule of consistency-Ay- 2006-07. The special deduction u/s 80-IC was allowed last year. Without change of facts the deduction could not be refused on the ground of ‘recon [LexDoc Id : 421723]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2012 |
Manohar Singh vs D.S. Sharma and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 421606]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2012 |
Mohandas vs Authority under Minimum Wages Act, 1948, Deputy Commissioner Labour and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 444186]
|
HC (Madras) |
2012 |
Anil Steel and Industries Ltd. vs Labour Court and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 441690]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2012 |
Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corpn. vs Presiding Officer, Labour Court and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 441683]
|
HC (Madras) |
2012 |
CIT vs Pushpa Vijoy
Maintainability of: Department's appeal-Low-tax effect - Power of High Court-A.Y. 1997-98 to 2000-01. Substantial question of law or of importance could be admitted inspite of small-tax effect.
If question arises in many c [LexDoc Id : 426122]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2012 |
CIT and Anr. vs K. Leelavathy
Capital Asset-Agricultural land-A.Y. 2005-06. The assessee sold his agricultural land on 7.4.2004. The permission for change of use was granted on 10.5.2004. The land remained agricu [LexDoc Id : 425571]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2012 |
CIT vs Ajay Automation (P) Ltd.
Special deduction-Export of software-Law applicable-A.Y. 1989-90. The assessee was exporting software. It was entitled to deduction u/s 80HHC for the period prior to insertion of S. 80HHE.
Ss. 80HH [LexDoc Id : 424737]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2012 |
Diamond Tool Industries vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 423224]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
| |
| First | Prev | 151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | Next | Last |
| |
