| First | Prev | 241 | 242 | 243 | 244 | 245 | 246 | 247 | 248 | 249 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 6202 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Gawande Consultants (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 492965]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2016 |
Vimal Singh Rajput vs Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.
Competition Act 2002: Abuse of dominant position-Act of securing interests through use of vehicle tracking system not anti-competitive, No case under section 4 made out-Whether the information alleging, inter alia, that the opposite party, being dominant in the relevant market, had imposed a number of unfair condition [LexDoc Id : 492883]
|
MISC |
2016 |
V.E. Commercial Vehicles Ltd. vs Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corpn.
Competition Act 2002: Abuse of dominant position-Opposite party not found to be in dominant position in relevant market, Dissenting view-Whether the allegations that the opposite party, in the process of procurement of bus chassis, had acted in an anti-competitive manner by imposing dis [LexDoc Id : 492882]
|
MISC |
2016 |
Turbo Aviation (P) Ltd. vs Bangalore International Airport Ltd., GVK Power and Infrastructure Ltd. and Airports Authority of India
Competition Act 2002: Allegations of abuse of dominant position-No cogent material in support of allegations, No case under section 3 and section 4 made out-Whether the allegations of informant pertaining to infraction of provisions of section 3 and section 4 of the Competition Act 2002 by the opposite par [LexDoc Id : 492881]
|
MISC |
2016 |
Raghubir Mertia vs Aura Real Estate (P) Ltd. and Waghere Promoters
Competition Act 2002: Abuse of dominant position-Absence of dominance of opposite parties in relevant market, No case under section 4 arising-Whether the conduct of opposite parties in not delivering the possession of subject flat in a timely manner, imposing unfair terms and conditions thro [LexDoc Id : 492878]
|
MISC |
2016 |
Sonepat Co-op Sugar Mills Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 492817]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2016 |
ITO vs Nandlala Securities (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 492807]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2016 |
ITO vs Franco Leome Shoes (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 492795]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2016 |
ITO vs Ashish Sahai
[LexDoc Id : 492791]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2016 |
Amitava Roy vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 492789]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2016 |
ITO vs Akhil Kakkar
[LexDoc Id : 492788]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2016 |
Nisha Sharma vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
Sending of cheque and signatures for private expert opinion: Permission for second opinion-Impugned order passed after considering entire facts and evidence, Applications dismissed-Whether permission in the application moved by the complainant for second opinion from another handwriting expert could be granted. Held, though, the [LexDoc Id : 492756]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2016 |
CIT vs Bank of Nova Scotia
Cancellation of penalty under section 271-C-Facts and law properly and correctly assessed by lower authorities, Appeal dismissed-Whether assessment of penalty under section 271-C of the Income Tax Act 1961 was justified. Held, the tribunal had cancelled the penalty levied under [LexDoc Id : 492707]
|
SC |
2016 |
ACIT vs Abhishek Agarwal
[LexDoc Id : 493563]
|
ITAT |
2016 |
Kirloskar Proprietary Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 493487]
|
ITAT (Pune) |
2016 |
Ganesh Polychem Ltd. vs ITO
Adjustment of brought forward loss and depreciation-Section 10B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Computation of deduction-The assessee has challenged the action of the AO and the CIT (A) of adjusting the brought forward loss and depreciation before allowing exemption unde [LexDoc Id : 493022]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2016 |
DCIT vs Premier Spinning and Weaving Mills (P) Ltd. and Brindavan Cotton Mills (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 492897]
|
ITAT (Chennai) |
2016 |
Yeshwanth Shenoy vs Air India, Alliance Air and Air India Express and Ors.
Competition Act 2002: Abuse of dominant position-Exercise of free choice by second opposite party to avail services of first opposite party, No case under section 4 made out-Whether the informant's prayer to, inter alia, impose penalties on first opposite party for engaging in abuse of dominant position, direct second oppo [LexDoc Id : 492884]
|
MISC |
2016 |
Sanyogita Goyal vs Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd.
Competition Act 2002: Abuse of dominant position-Major developers competing with opposite party in relevant market, No case under section 4 made out-Whether the allegations relating to a commercial space booked by the informant in the project of the opposite party were tenable. Held, the informant [LexDoc Id : 492879]
|
MISC |
2016 |
Shaw Wallace Distilleries Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 492816]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2016 |
Satellite Television Asian Region Ltd. vs DDIT
[LexDoc Id : 492815]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2016 |
DCIT vs Netguru Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 492808]
|
ITAT (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Mirah Dekor Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 492805]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2016 |
M.R. Bhandari and Sons (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 492803]
|
ITAT (Panaji) |
2016 |
HFCL Satellite Communications Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 492800]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2016 |
| |
| First | Prev | 241 | 242 | 243 | 244 | 245 | 246 | 247 | 248 | 249 | Next | Last |
| |
