| First | Prev | 261 | 262 | 263 | 264 | 265 | 266 | 267 | 268 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 6693 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Pearey Lal and Sons (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
DCIT vs Pearey Lal and Sons (P) Ltd.
Deletion of disallowance-Capital Expenditure-Whether, CIT(A) has erred in deleting part disallowance made by AO on account of expenses claimed in profit and loss account under head "repair and ma [LexDoc Id : 507426]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2017 |
ACIT vs Lovely Fragrances
Claim of depreciation-Installation of windmill-Whether, CIT(A) has erred in allowing claim of depreciation of certain amount on windmill installed during previous year. Held, carefully gone through [LexDoc Id : 507424]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2017 |
Jay Ambe Finance vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 507423]
|
ITAT (Ahmedabad) |
2017 |
Ganga Prasad Goel vs JCIT
[LexDoc Id : 507422]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2017 |
Eagle Couriers vs Addl. CIT
[LexDoc Id : 507421]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2017 |
ITO vs Amardeep Textiles
[LexDoc Id : 507417]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2017 |
Arvind Dev vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 507343]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2017 |
Pradip B. Seju vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 507287]
|
ITAT (Ahmedabad) |
2017 |
Anil Lakhanlal Malviya vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 507272]
|
ITAT (Nagpur) |
2017 |
Paresh Nath Singha vs DCIT
Enhancement of disallowance-Bogus expenses-Assessee is into clearing and forwarding of ACC cement and has claimed expenditure of Rs.1.98 crore. AO has made disallowance based on report of Inspe [LexDoc Id : 507649]
|
ITAT (Calcutta) |
2017 |
Niharika Estates (P)Ltd. vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 507648]
|
ITAT (Calcutta) |
2017 |
Karuna Sharda vs ITO
Restoration of case-Section 133(6) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Addressing evidences.-Assessee had requested tax authorities to directly call for documents from bank by issuing notice under Section 133(6). Whether, issue may be restored [LexDoc Id : 507646]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2017 |
ACIT vs Jagdish Thakkar
Deletion of addition-Section 69 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Bogus Purchase.-Addition made under Section 69C of Act in respect of bogus purchases had been deleted by FAA. Whether, addition under Section 69C of Act in respect of [LexDoc Id : 507644]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2017 |
Dinesh Pal Singh vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 507642]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2017 |
Ravinder Kumar Sharma vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 507558]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2017 |
ITO vs Rane Associates
Rane Associates vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 507557]
|
ITAT (Pune) |
2017 |
Wadsons India (P) Ltd. vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 507530]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2017 |
P. Rama Devi vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 507521]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2017 |
Om Prakash Arora vs JCIT
[LexDoc Id : 507520]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2017 |
Satinder Singh vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 507430]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2017 |
Ravi Kataria Ratlam and Madanlal Kataria Ratla vs VS DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 507428]
|
ITAT (Indore) |
2017 |
Rajendra Prasad Dua vs ACIT
Disallowance-Freight and cartage expenses-Whether, AO was justified in made disallowance towards freight and cartage expenses. Held, AO has made disallowance of certain amounts towards freight [LexDoc Id : 507427]
|
ITAT (Indore) |
2017 |
Binayale Tex Processors Ltd. vs ACIT
Disallowance-Section 14 A read with Rule 8D 2 (iii) of the Income Tax Rules,1962. Purchase bills.-Whether, CIT(A) justified confirming disallowance under Section 14 A read with Rule 8D 2 (iii) ofRules,1962. Held, assessee had made payment of Rs. 2. [LexDoc Id : 507420]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2017 |
ACIT vs Bhushan K. Vora and Bhushan K. Vora
[LexDoc Id : 507419]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2017 |
Mahesh Ladha Karotra vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 507323]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2017 |
| |
| First | Prev | 261 | 262 | 263 | 264 | 265 | 266 | 267 | 268 | Next | Last |
| |
