Register free! 
Banking - Judgement
[ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  

 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 6644   
Title Forum  Year
Paliwal Infrastructure (P) Ltd. vs Addl. CIT and DCIT [LexDoc Id : 557555]
ITAT (Delhi) 2019
ITO vs Mahavir Irrigation (P) Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 557554]
ITAT (Delhi) 2019
Globe Agencies vs ACIT [LexDoc Id : 557553]
ITAT (Delhi) 2019
DCIT vs Ganpati Fincap (P) Ltd.

Ganpati Fincap (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 557552]
ITAT (Delhi) 2019
Esmart Energy Solutions (P) Ltd. vs DCIT [LexDoc Id : 557551]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2019
Ankitham Jagga Row Indrani vs ITO and ACIT

ITO and ACIT vs Ankitham Jagga Row Indrani
Capital gain-Addition-Whether, determination of ALP of the international transaction of providing software development services by the Assessee to its AE suggested an addit [LexDoc Id : 557367]
ITAT (Vishakapatnam) 2019
ACIT vs Sunray Green Space (P) Ltd.

Sunray Green Space (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
Taxable service of health club-Denial of refund-Appellant is an association of persons engaged in providing club facilities and are registered under the taxable service of health club and fitness ce [LexDoc Id : 557366]
ITAT (Vishakapatnam) 2019
Suresh Kumar Jain vs ACIT Deduction-Exemption from paying-Assessee has mainly challenged the disallowance of deduction under section 80IB(10) of the Act amounting to Rs. 12,35,762/- The brief facts leading to [LexDoc Id : 557365]
ITAT (Vishakapatnam) 2019
Shivacid India (P) Ltd. vs ITO [LexDoc Id : 557364]
ITAT (Ahmedabad) 2019
Atmaram Dadaji Mokashe vs Pr. CIT Concealment of income-Inaccurate particulars- Whether, it is for concealing particulars of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The show cause notice u/s 274 of the Act does not [LexDoc Id : 557363]
ITAT (Pune) 2019
Samshodhan Dnyan Vichar Pratishthan vs CIT [LexDoc Id : 557362]
ITAT (Pune) 2019
Paharpur Cooling Towers Ltd. vs Pr. CIT [LexDoc Id : 557361]
ITAT (Calcutta) 2019
Oriental Bank of Commerce Central Account Office vs ACIT [LexDoc Id : 557360]
ITAT (Delhi) 2019
Dinakar Sai Constructions vs ACIT Addition-Section 68 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Share application money.-CITA upholding the addition made u/s 68 of the Act towards share application money. Whether, CITA was justified in upholding addition made u/s 68 of A [LexDoc Id : 557359]
ITAT (Vishakapatnam) 2019
DCIT vs National Insurance Co. Ltd. Reassessment-Assessable value-Respondent had imported various varieties of the Aluminum with invoices and purchase orders in respect therein declaring the transaction value of the [LexDoc Id : 557358]
ITAT (Calcutta) 2019
ACIT vs Cresco Technology (P) Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 557356]
ITAT (Vishakapatnam) 2019
ITO vs Mehta Charitable Prajanalya Trust [LexDoc Id : 557355]
ITAT (Delhi) 2019
Jabibur Rahaman vs Pr. CIT Cenvat Credit-Final Product-Appellants engaged in manufacture of sponge iron. They are also engaged in generation of electricity and were availing the credit of cenvat credit pai [LexDoc Id : 557354]
ITAT (Calcutta) 2019
Minu Bakshi vs ACIT Nature of payment-Remanding of case-Whether, Assessing Officer (AO) as to what is the true nature of payment of Rs.3.25 crores made by the respondent-Company (assessee) to one Mr. G.R. H [LexDoc Id : 557353]
ITAT (Delhi) 2019
ACIT vs Gracious Project (P) Ltd. Question of law-Section 260A (3) of Income Tax Act, 1961. At time of hearing.-Need to remand these appeals is called for because from the perusal of the order, High Court observed, "Assessee has raised the following questions of [LexDoc Id : 557352]
ITAT (Delhi) 2019
Classic Linens International (P) Ltd. vs DCIT Reopening of assessment-Validity of notice-CIT [Appeals] upheld the assessment of the disputed incomes in the individual capacity of the appellants by taking the view that there was no HUF as p [LexDoc Id : 557351]
ITAT (Chennai) 2019
Athena Trade Winds (P) Ltd. vs Pr. CIT and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 558117]
HC (Madhya Pradesh) 2019
ACIT vs Mala Dhingra [LexDoc Id : 557379]
ITAT (Delhi) 2019
Rajesh Passi vs ITO Addition-Documentary evidence-Whether, CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition of Rs. 24,04,388/-. Held, CIT (A) was left with no other option except to adjudicate the appeal ex-pa [LexDoc Id : 557377]
ITAT (Delhi) 2019
Kamlesh Kumar Agrawal vs ITO [LexDoc Id : 557376]
ITAT (Indore) 2019
 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last