First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
Documents Found: 6644 |
Title |
Forum |
Year |
Paliwal Infrastructure (P) Ltd. vs Addl. CIT and DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 557555]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2019 |
ITO vs Mahavir Irrigation (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 557554]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2019 |
Globe Agencies vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 557553]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2019 |
DCIT vs Ganpati Fincap (P) Ltd.
Ganpati Fincap (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 557552]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2019 |
Esmart Energy Solutions (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 557551]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2019 |
Ankitham Jagga Row Indrani vs ITO and ACIT
ITO and ACIT vs Ankitham Jagga Row Indrani
Capital gain-Addition-Whether, determination of ALP of the international transaction of providing software development services by the Assessee to its AE suggested an addit [LexDoc Id : 557367]
|
ITAT (Vishakapatnam) |
2019 |
ACIT vs Sunray Green Space (P) Ltd.
Sunray Green Space (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
Taxable service of health club-Denial of refund-Appellant is an association of persons engaged in providing club facilities and are registered under the taxable service of health club and fitness ce [LexDoc Id : 557366]
|
ITAT (Vishakapatnam) |
2019 |
Suresh Kumar Jain vs ACIT
Deduction-Exemption from paying-Assessee has mainly challenged the disallowance of deduction under section 80IB(10) of the Act amounting to Rs. 12,35,762/- The brief facts leading to [LexDoc Id : 557365]
|
ITAT (Vishakapatnam) |
2019 |
Shivacid India (P) Ltd. vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 557364]
|
ITAT (Ahmedabad) |
2019 |
Atmaram Dadaji Mokashe vs Pr. CIT
Concealment of income-Inaccurate particulars- Whether, it is for concealing particulars of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The show cause notice u/s 274 of the Act does not [LexDoc Id : 557363]
|
ITAT (Pune) |
2019 |
Samshodhan Dnyan Vichar Pratishthan vs CIT
[LexDoc Id : 557362]
|
ITAT (Pune) |
2019 |
Paharpur Cooling Towers Ltd. vs Pr. CIT
[LexDoc Id : 557361]
|
ITAT (Calcutta) |
2019 |
Oriental Bank of Commerce Central Account Office vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 557360]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2019 |
Dinakar Sai Constructions vs ACIT
Addition-Section 68 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Share application money.-CITA upholding the addition made u/s 68 of the Act towards share application money. Whether, CITA was justified in upholding addition made u/s 68 of A [LexDoc Id : 557359]
|
ITAT (Vishakapatnam) |
2019 |
DCIT vs National Insurance Co. Ltd.
Reassessment-Assessable value-Respondent had imported various varieties of the Aluminum with invoices and purchase orders in respect therein declaring the transaction value of the [LexDoc Id : 557358]
|
ITAT (Calcutta) |
2019 |
ACIT vs Cresco Technology (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 557356]
|
ITAT (Vishakapatnam) |
2019 |
ITO vs Mehta Charitable Prajanalya Trust
[LexDoc Id : 557355]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2019 |
Jabibur Rahaman vs Pr. CIT
Cenvat Credit-Final Product-Appellants engaged in manufacture of sponge iron. They are also engaged in generation of electricity and were availing the credit of cenvat credit pai [LexDoc Id : 557354]
|
ITAT (Calcutta) |
2019 |
Minu Bakshi vs ACIT
Nature of payment-Remanding of case-Whether, Assessing Officer (AO) as to what is the true nature of payment of Rs.3.25 crores made by the respondent-Company (assessee) to one Mr. G.R. H [LexDoc Id : 557353]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2019 |
ACIT vs Gracious Project (P) Ltd.
Question of law-Section 260A (3) of Income Tax Act, 1961. At time of hearing.-Need to remand these appeals is called for because from the perusal of the order, High Court observed, "Assessee has raised the following questions of [LexDoc Id : 557352]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2019 |
Classic Linens International (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
Reopening of assessment-Validity of notice-CIT [Appeals] upheld the assessment of the disputed incomes in the individual capacity of the appellants by taking the view that there was no HUF as p [LexDoc Id : 557351]
|
ITAT (Chennai) |
2019 |
Athena Trade Winds (P) Ltd. vs Pr. CIT and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 558117]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2019 |
ACIT vs Mala Dhingra
[LexDoc Id : 557379]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2019 |
Rajesh Passi vs ITO
Addition-Documentary evidence-Whether, CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition of Rs. 24,04,388/-. Held, CIT (A) was left with no other option except to adjudicate the appeal ex-pa [LexDoc Id : 557377]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2019 |
Kamlesh Kumar Agrawal vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 557376]
|
ITAT (Indore) |
2019 |
|
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
|