| First | Prev | 151 | 152 | 153 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 3821 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Goel Wax (P) Ltd. vs ITO
Re-opening of assessment-Sections 147, 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Income escaping assessment-Whether, initiation of proceedings under section 147 read with section 148 is without jurisdiction, mechanical, without application of mind, illegal a [LexDoc Id : 559931]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2020 |
DCIT vs Swan Gold Mining Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 559930]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2020 |
Pangode Service Co-op. Bank Ltd., Varkala Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. and Andoorkonam Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. vs ITO
Validity of order-Re-opening of assessment-Assessee filed appeal against order issued by assessing officer regarding re-opening of assessment proceeding for different years. Whether AO was just [LexDoc Id : 559929]
|
ITAT (Cochin) |
2020 |
In the matter of Suman Chakraborty vs Anhui Technology Imp. and Exp. Co. Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 558958]
|
|
2020 |
Refex Industries Ltd. and Sherisha Technologies (P) Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner of CGST and CE and Ors.
Deployment-Exemption-Applicant, stated to be a service provider by the deployment of personnel like a plumber, sweeper, security guard, electrician, carpenter etc. to the [LexDoc Id : 560540]
|
HC (Madras) |
2020 |
Vakathanam Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. vs ITO
Book profit-Accounting Standards-Assessee a Company filed its return of income for the A.Y. 2013-14 on 30/11/2013 admitting total income of Rs. 1,19,33,700/. Whether, on the facts and [LexDoc Id : 559869]
|
ITAT (Cochin) |
2020 |
Today Hotels (Andhra)(P) Ltd. vs DCIT
Validity of assessment-No infringement of procedure-Whether, order passed by appellate tribunal is right or wrong or that it has rightly or wrongly set-aside the order of the CIT(C) is ex-facie not a su [LexDoc Id : 559866]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2020 |
Sneh Lata Garg vs DCIT
Reopening of assessment-Deduction-CIT(A) erred in holding that notice u/s 148 was without jurisdiction. Whether, there was no failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and [LexDoc Id : 559865]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2020 |
Share Khan Ltd. vs DCIT
DCIT vs Share Khan Ltd.
Penalty-Trade advances-Assessee is a private limited company in the business of retail trade of metal alloys, adhesives, plywood, glass, tiles, etc. Whether, these trade adv [LexDoc Id : 559863]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2020 |
Ravindra Bhikaji Naike vs ACIT
Addition-Undisclosed income-Whether, CIT(A) erred in law and on facts of the case in restricting the additions and giving a relief of certain sum to the applicant out of the tota [LexDoc Id : 559862]
|
ITAT (Pune) |
2020 |
JAI PAL vs ITO
Reopening of assessment-Section 292BB of Income Tax Act, 1961. Validity of notice.-Assistant Director could not rely upon the main section 292BB and claim that notice under section 143(2) was deemed to be served within the stipulated [LexDoc Id : 559826]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2020 |
Pannivizha Service Co-op Bank Ltd. vs ITO
Disallowance of deduction-Section 80P (2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. Deduction of interest-Whether, claim of deduction under section 80P (2) of Act has been rightly disallowed. Held, Assessing Officer has to conduct inquiry into factual situ [LexDoc Id : 559825]
|
ITAT (Cochin) |
2020 |
Kiran Aluminum India (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
Disallowance of deduction-Section 35 (1) (ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Opportunity to cross examine-Whether, disallowance of deduction under section 35 (1) (ii) of Act in respect of donation of Rs. 30.00 lacs made to Herbicure Health Care Bio Herbal [LexDoc Id : 559824]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2020 |
ACIT vs FCI Asia (P) Ltd.
Addition-Section 68 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Share application money.-CITA upholding the addition made u/s 68 of the Act towards share application money. Whether, CITA was justified in upholding addition made u/s 68 of A [LexDoc Id : 559823]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2020 |
Rakesh Kumar Kalra vs ITO
Validity of order-Re-opening of assessment-Assessee filed appeal against order issued by assessing officer regarding re-opening of assessment proceeding for different years. Whether AO was just [LexDoc Id : 559822]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2020 |
ECO RRB Infra (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
Rejection of investment expenses-Section 80IA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Investment in power projects-Whether, on facts and circumstances claim of assessee under section 80IA of Act has been rightly rejected. Held, where assessee's main activity was co [LexDoc Id : 559821]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2020 |
C.L. Sharma vs DCIT
Deduction from total income-Determination of total income-Whether, CIT (A) erred in not holding that amount of Rs. 1.94 Crores was to be excluded from total income for year under consideration. Held, no mater [LexDoc Id : 559820]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2020 |
Carol Securities (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
Confirmation of Addition-Deposit in bank account-Assessee is individual who filed his return of income. In return of income the assessee disclosed the business income, capital gain and other sources. [LexDoc Id : 559819]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2020 |
ACIT vs Ambuja Cements Ltd.
Ambuja Cements Ltd. vs DCIT
Admission of additional ground-Income Tax Act, 1961. Grounds not raised during proceedings-Whether, assessee is right in filing additional ground of appeal in respect of sales tax incentive/subsidy of Rs. 1,28,25,66,755/- availed during year [LexDoc Id : 559818]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2020 |
Dream Flats (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
Disallowance of expenditure-Section 24 (b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Disallowance of interest-Whether, CIT (A) has erred in confirming disallowance on account of interest claimed by assessee under section 24(b) of Act where there are no interes [LexDoc Id : 559817]
|
ITAT (Jaipur) |
2020 |
Sk. Md. Rafique vs Managing Committee, Contai Rahamania High Madrasah and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 558889]
|
SC |
2020 |
K. Nirai Mathi Azhagan vs UOI and Ors.
Fees for default in furnishing return of income-Article 14 of Constitution of India. Section 234 (F) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Constitutional validity of provision-Whether, levy of fees for default in furnishing return of income under section 234 (F) of Act is constitutional valid. Held, Act is complete code in i [LexDoc Id : 561470]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2020 |
Yalgud Foods and Milk Products (P) Ltd. vs ITO
Addition-Business asset-Whether, CIT (Appeal) not justified on facts and in law sustaining the addition in the Net Wealth. Whether, reassessment made u/s 17 of Wealth Tax Act [LexDoc Id : 559816]
|
ITAT (Pune) |
2020 |
Varun Kumar Bansal vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 559815]
|
ITAT (Jaipur) |
2020 |
ITO vs Basanti Kumari and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 559814]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2020 |
| |
| First | Prev | 151 | 152 | 153 | Next | Last |
| |
