| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 689 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Narendra Aggarwal vs Pr. CIT
[LexDoc Id : 593984]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2022 |
DCIT vs Muppala Bhasker Reddy
[LexDoc Id : 593983]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2022 |
Asha Yadav vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 593978]
|
ITAT (Jaipur) |
2022 |
Algae Labs vs State Tax Officer
[LexDoc Id : 593476]
|
HC (Madras) |
2022 |
J.M. Financial and Investment Consultancy vs ACIT
Validity of reassessment notice-Sections 148, 151 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Authority to issue notice-Petitioner challenged notice issued under section 148 of Act. Whether, approval obtained for issuing notice under Section 148 of Act is not in accorda [LexDoc Id : 593155]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2022 |
Balwan Singh vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 592737]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2022 |
Sami - Sabinsa Group Ltd. vs DCIT
Determination of arms length price-Section 92B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Calculation of Guarantee Commission -Whether, DRP has erred in upholding order of TPO in making addition of Rs.88,89,439/- to total income on account of commission on corporate guarantee [LexDoc Id : 592668]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2022 |
ACIT vs Sun Direct TV (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 593979]
|
ITAT (Chennai) |
2022 |
Vijendra Stores vs State of Haryana and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 593477]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2022 |
V. Vasanthakumar vs UOI
Constitutional validity of provision-Section 32 (2) (a) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988. Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016. Qualification for appointment as Judicial Member-Petitioner challenged the validity of 32(2) (a) of Act. Whether, section 32 (2) (a) of Act is constitutionally valid. Held, Constitution indeed does n [LexDoc Id : 593152]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2022 |
Sporta Technologies (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs Unfading OPC (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 593149]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2022 |
Jugal Kishore Paliwal, Saraswati Agro Industries and Ors. vs JCIT, ITO and Ors.
Reassessment proceedings-Sections 148, 151, 282-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Sanction for issuance of notice-Petitioner is running rice mill in name and style of M/s Shri Ji Rice Product. Petitioner challenged notice issued under Section 148 of Act. Whether, [LexDoc Id : 593148]
|
HC (Chhattisgarh) |
2022 |
Meeta Hasmukh Gandhi vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 592738]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2022 |
Chinna Ponnu Ammal Trust vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 592735]
|
ITAT (Chennai) |
2022 |
AXA France Vie vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 592734]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2022 |
ITO vs Deepak Bajaj
[LexDoc Id : 595168]
|
ITAT (Calcutta) |
2022 |
Ashika Credit Capital Ltd. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 593151]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2022 |
Attachmate Corpn. DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 593115]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2022 |
Nefab India (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 593114]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2022 |
DCIT vs HP Services (Singapore) (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 593113]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2022 |
Sagar Ratna Restaurants vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 593112]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2022 |
Inder Pal Singh Bedi vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 593111]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2022 |
Gurbakshish Singh Batra vs Pr. CIT
Revision of assessment-Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Power of commissioner-Assessee challenged order passed by PCIT under section 263 of Act. Whether, Pr. CIT was not justified in invoking provisions of section 263 of Act eve [LexDoc Id : 592702]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2022 |
Technosteel Infraprojects (P) Ltd. vs State of Madhya Pradesh Through and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 593731]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2022 |
Richie Rich Exim Solutions vs Comm. CGST
[LexDoc Id : 593730]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2022 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
