| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 837 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Subash Chand vs Mitsui and Co.
[LexDoc Id : 408066]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2009 |
Carla Gannon and Anr. vs Shabaz Farukh Allarakhia and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 366943]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Greenply Industries Ltd. vs Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 403931]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2009 |
M. Mahendran vs Indian Overseas Bank and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 387452]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2009 |
Rajendra Pandurang Pagare, Anisoddhin Sk. Kamroddhin and Ors.vs State of Maharashtra, Superintending Engineer and Ors.
Sachin Sahebrao Patil, Sandiplal Arunlal Jaiswal and Ranjana Nivrutti Patil vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 373515]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Dhananjay Ramkrishna Tukakne vs Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, New Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur University, All India Council of Technical Education, UOI and State of Maharashtra
[LexDoc Id : 366909]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Olivinho J.F. Gomes vs State of Goa and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 366743]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Alluminium Profiles Ltd., Gurudatta J. Gavalkar, Crystal Corpn. and R.M. Dalmia vs UOI and Settlement Commission
[LexDoc Id : 367402]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Shaikh Shahnawaz Ali vs CCE and C
Rejection of applications for condonation of delay: Delay of about 30 days-Papers given to consultant within time of filing appeals, Delay in office of consultant, Failure of consultant not to result in denying to petitioners a remedy of hearing, Delay condoned, Tribunal directed to consider applications-In petitions against rejection of applications for condonation of delay of about 30 days in filing appeals, the high court noted that the petitioners [LexDoc Id : 418327]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Kashinath Narayan Gharat (Dead) through L.Rs, Daya Kashinath Gharat and Ors. vs Maharashtra State Electricity Distributin Co. Ltd. and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 366954]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Devaki Antharjanam vs Sreedharan Namboodiri and Anr.
Suit for recovery of possession and mesne profit-Undertaking that value of improvement would not be claimed-The Supreme Court, determining whether the respondent could make a claim for enhanced compensation for improvements allegedly made by him, noted that [LexDoc Id : 366632]
|
SC |
2009 |
M.K. Abraham and Co. and Vijay Constructions vs State of Kerala and Anr.
Contract consisting of a printed form with cyclostyled amendments-Best form of agreement where all terms incorporated in a single document-It was undoubted that if the contract contained a provision specifically barring arbitration, there could be no reference to arbitration. Further, if [LexDoc Id : 366622]
|
SC |
2009 |
Babu Lal Sharma vs State of Madhya Pradesh
Suit for declaration of title to the property in dispute-Suit lands originally were mines and declared as nazool lands-In an appeal filed against the dismissal of suit for declaration of title to the property in dispute, the Supreme Court held that the exhibited docume [LexDoc Id : 366487]
|
SC |
2009 |
Mahesh Chandra Gupta vs UOI and Ors.
Legality of appointment of respondent as Additional Judge-Respondent satisfying the eligibility qualification-On the questions whether appointment of respondent number 3 as Additional Judge of Allahabad High Court was an infraction of article 217(1) and articl [LexDoc Id : 366559]
|
SC |
2009 |
A. Manjula Bhashini and Ors. vs A.P. Women's Co-op Finance Corpn. Ltd. and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 366489]
|
SC |
2009 |
Bhari Metal Fabrication (P) Ltd. vs CESTAT, Chennai
Exercise of discretion by tribunal: Scope of interference by high court under article 226-No amount forfeited by revenue, Deposit subject to outcome of appeal, Petition challenging imposition of condition of pre-deposit dismissed-Though the tribunal was constituted for hearing the appeal and also clothed with the power for grant of interim order on condition including waiver of [LexDoc Id : 421747]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2009 |
Mohd. Ishaq Mohd. Gulam vs State of M.P. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 399879]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2009 |
Malini Mukesh Vora vs UOI
[LexDoc Id : 372823]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2009 |
Bipin Synthetics (P) Ltd. vs State of Maharashtra, CST and UOI
[LexDoc Id : 367612]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs UOI and Ors.
Writ jurisdiction of high court-Tests relevant to petitions under articles 226 and 227 not applicable when appellate court exercised its jurisdiction over a tribunal situated in more than one State-The tests, which were relevant to petitions under article 226 and article 227 of the Constitution of India, could not be applied when the appellate co [LexDoc Id : 417112]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2009 |
Annapurna vs State of West Bengal
[LexDoc Id : 387444]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2009 |
Bandekar Brothers (P) Ltd., Vassantram Metha and Co. (P) Ltd., Rama Bhiva Parab, Jaga Shiva Parab, Mahadeo Kashinath Parab, Gunulo Ramnath Parab and Anr. vs State of Goa, Alcon Cement Co. (P) Ltd., Couto Metals and Mining Co. (P) Ltd. and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 366769]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Sri Kondandaram Alloys (P) Ltd. and Anr. vs State Bank of India and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 409074]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2009 |
J.M. Baxi and Co. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 396570]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2009 |
South Tamil Nadu Beedi Manufrs. Association vs UOI
[LexDoc Id : 390209]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2009 |
| |
| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| |
