| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 837 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Mangal Polysil vs ACC
[LexDoc Id : 398237]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Madras Hire Purchase Association, Association of Leasing and Financial Services Companies, Equipment Leasing Association India and T.T. Srinivasaraghavan vs UOI, CBEC, Chief CCE and Commissioner of Central Excise Service Tax
Constitutional validity of service tax on hire purchase transactions-Service tax on leasing transactions-The levy of service tax on hire purchase and leasing transactions was valid.
S.65(12)(1) of the Finance Act 1994
Article 14 and art [LexDoc Id : 366513]
|
HC (Madras) |
2009 |
Shree Ganesh Trading Co. and Sushil Kumar Khandelia vs Hindustan Paper Corpn. Ltd., Chief Executive, Deputy General Manager and Shiva Enterprise
[LexDoc Id : 365266]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2009 |
Rahul Pant, Raj Kumari, National Finance Co., Anil Modi, Ashok Kumar, Anil Modi, Vardman Bartan Store, Raman Aggarwal, Agm Sales Corpn., Anand Rathi Securities Ltd., Bal Krishan Gupta, Rajinder Gupta and Anr. vs State and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 364496]
|
HC (Jammu and Kashmir) |
2009 |
UOI and Ors. vs Gyan Chand Chattar
Charge of corruption: Punishment of dismissal-Charge-sheet without giving specific and definite charge-In cases involving corruption there could not be any other punishment than dismissal. The amount misappropriated might be small or large; it was the a [LexDoc Id : 363715]
|
SC |
2009 |
Modern Dental College and Research Centre and Ors. vs State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 373298]
|
SC |
2009 |
Saint Gobain Glass India Ltd. and All India Glass Manufacturers Federation vs UOI and Ors.
Imposition of provisional duty-Import of soda ash-A petition challenging the action of the Director General (Safeguards) of imposing provisional duty on the petitioner without waiting for the outcome [LexDoc Id : 364825]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2009 |
A. Subair vs State of Kerala
Demand of illegal gratification-Factum of demand unproved-The primary requisite of an offence under s.13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 was proof of a demand or request of a valuable thing or [LexDoc Id : 363565]
|
SC |
2009 |
U.P. State Road Transport Corpn. vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 372378]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2009 |
Royal Ocean Agency (P) Ltd. vs UOI
Challenge to show cause notice alleging non-payment of service tax-Issue of collection and payment of service tax a question of fact-The petitioner had contended that it was working as a sub-contractor of fifth respondent and the fourth respondent had collected service tax on behalf [LexDoc Id : 397144]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2009 |
Hindustan Copper Ltd. vs NICCO Corpn. Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 367912]
|
SC |
2009 |
Grand Chemical Works vs Presiding Officer, Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 373570]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2009 |
Mallaraddi H. Itagi and Ors. vs High Court of Karnataka and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 445776]
|
SC |
2009 |
Sukhwant Singh and Ors. vs State of Punjab
[LexDoc Id : 372132]
|
SC |
2009 |
Ratna Sharma vs UCO Bank and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 380890]
|
HC (Jharkhand) |
2009 |
Uttaranchal Jal Sansthan and Ors. vs Laxmi Devi and Kishore Chandra Pandey Ors.
Compassionate appointment: Deceased daily wage labourers-Government Servant under rule 2, Equity clause in articles 14 and 16-The Supreme Court, on a question whether the dependent of a deceased, who was not a permanent or temporary employee, would be entitled to appointment [LexDoc Id : 363165]
|
SC |
2009 |
Santosh Sood vs Gajendra Singh and Ors.
Pendency of civil suit: Justification of entertaining PIL by high court-High court not to interfere with due process of law except for cogent reasons-If a Civil Suit was pending, which might or might not be frivolous, ordinarily the high court should not have entertained public interest litigation. [LexDoc Id : 363159]
|
SC |
2009 |
Maharani Devi and Anr. vs UOI and Ors.
Compassionate appointment-Relevant date for deciding appellants claim in question-The Supreme Court noted that the question whether which was the relevant dated for deciding the claim of the appellants; whether it was the date on wh [LexDoc Id : 362914]
|
SC |
2009 |
Prabhatsinh Samatsinh vs District Superintendent of Police and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 396920]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2009 |
Wanson Leather Industries (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 379287]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2009 |
Government of Andhra Pradesh and Anr. vs N. Ramanaiah
[LexDoc Id : 362978]
|
SC |
2009 |
Basanti Prasad vs Bihar School Examination Board and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 362957]
|
SC |
2009 |
Villianur Iyarkkai Padukappu Maiyam vs UOI and Ors.
Challenge to the award of the contract in favour of the Developer-Maintainability of PIL-On a preliminary objection regarding locus standi of the appellant to challenge the Award of the Contract for the development of the Pondicherry Port [LexDoc Id : 362926]
|
SC |
2009 |
UOI vs Ramesh Ram and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 362685]
|
SC |
2009 |
Amarinder Singh vs Prakash Singh Badal and Ors.
Powers of the Supreme Court-Likelihood of bias for transfer-For securing the ends of justice it would be open to the Supreme Court to transfer any case or appeal from one high court to another high court or fro [LexDoc Id : 362684]
|
SC |
2009 |
| |
| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| |
