Sushila Devi vs SEBI
Conduct of company-Accountability of director-The role of a particular director within a company was always a question of fact. Consequently, a director could be prosecuted on account of fraudulen [LexDoc Id : 329441]
A. Shenoy and Co. and Ors. vs N.D. Kadam and Ors.
Prosecution: Failure to deduct tax at source-Law applicable after omission of s.276B-AY 1984-85 and AY 1985-86. S.276B was omitted w.e.f. 1 April 1989. There was no saving clause. Instead penalty proceedings were inserted under s.271C [LexDoc Id : 330647]
Texmaco Ltd. vs State and Anr.
Criminal proceedings-Relief at interim stage-An application under s. 452 of the CrPC was rejected on account of pending proceedings under s. 630 of the Companies Act 1956, since the desired relie [LexDoc Id : 331191]
K. Srikanth Singh vs North East Securities Ltd.
Dishonour of cheque-Liability of director-A matter related to vicarious liability of the director of the company in respect of dishonour of a cheque issued by the company has to be pleaded and [LexDoc Id : 324973]
SC
2007
B.R. Bajaj and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Offence by company: Liability of directors-Complaint for non-disclosure of material facts substantially-There provisions of s.63(1) of the Companies Act 1956 did not speak of the accused persons being in-charge of the administration and day-to-day activi [LexDoc Id : 347204]
Chandra Kumar Dhanuka and Ors. vs ROC
Offences and Prosecution-Relief from liability-The High court had powers similar to that of a criminal court in giving the relief to the petitioning officer from the liability under the s. 633 of t [LexDoc Id : 331839]
