Laxmi Dyechem vs State of Gujarat and Ors.
Dishonour of cheque: ‘Stop payment’ instruction rebuttable-Accused to show instruction issued not because of insufficiency or paucity of funds but for other valid reasons, S.138 and s.139 to be given harmonious construction-Dishonour of cheques for the reasons stated in s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881, although was sufficient for commission of offence, the ca [LexDoc Id : 434528]
Indra Kumar Patodia vs Reliance Industries Ltd.
Complaint: Person could be called upon to answer charge of false complaint or perjury only on a verification statement-Writing not pre-supposing that the same had to be signed-A person could be called upon to answer a charge of false complaint or perjury only on a verification statement and not mere on the presentation of co [LexDoc Id : 434414]
K.M. Venkateswaran and Anr. vs AROC
Penalty for fraudulently inducing persons to invest money: Petition seeking quashing of proceedings-Mobilisation of amount not disputed, Burden on petitioners to prove amount not received from third parties, No document to that effect forthcoming, Case of the year 2003, No reason to quash proceedings, Petition dismissed-The respondent had filed a complaint under s.68 of the Companies Act 1956 alleging that the company had mobilised Rs.275 crores and Rs.29.40 crores th [LexDoc Id : 443382]
