| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 758 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
S. Govidaraju vs State of Karnataka
Appeal against conviction: Reversal of findings of trial court-Prosecution proving its case successfully-The trial court had acquitted the accused by concluding that there had been material contradictions in the statements of witnesses on material issues [LexDoc Id : 448065]
|
SC |
2013 |
Venkatesan vs Rani and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 447961]
|
SC |
2013 |
Ahammad Mainuddin Shaikh vs State of Maharashtra
[LexDoc Id : 458044]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Umeshkumar Gopichand Goel vs State of Gujarat
[LexDoc Id : 448411]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2013 |
Aakif Ateeque Nachan vs State of Maharashtra
[LexDoc Id : 457856]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Yogesh Duryodhan Murkut vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 457854]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Lalu Prasad @ Lalu Prasad Yadav vs State of Jharkhand
Independence of judiciary-Trial to be conducted in fair manner and administration of justice to be fair and independent-Independence of judiciary was the basic feature of the Constitution. It demanded that a judge, who presided over the trial, the public prosecutor, who [LexDoc Id : 447757]
|
SC |
2013 |
Sanket Balkurshna Jadhav vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 458042]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Kalpesh Amrut Sorthi, Dharmesh Kantu Sorthi, Nimesh @ Lalu Natu Sorthi, Jignesh @ Jigu Natu Sorthi, Anil Kantu Sorthi, Jignesh Raman Dubla and Suresh Mafat Patni vs State of Maharashtra and Hansaben Raju Sorati
[LexDoc Id : 458023]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Balu Nehaji Garde, Anirudh @ Anil Nehaji Garde and Rakhmaji Nehaji Garde vs State of Maharashtra
[LexDoc Id : 458012]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Pornima vs State of Maharashtra
[LexDoc Id : 457853]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
FIL Industries Ltd. vs Imtiyaz Ahmed Bhat
[LexDoc Id : 454447]
|
SC |
2013 |
Dharminder Singh @ Vijay Singh vs State
Appeals against conviction: Case proved by prosecution-Conviction upheld-The accused-appellants had been convicted under s.364 and s.302 read with s.34 of the Indian Penal Code 1860. On appeals, the Supreme Court observed t [LexDoc Id : 447755]
|
SC |
2013 |
State of Madhya Pradesh vs Babulal and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 447753]
|
SC |
2013 |
State of Punjab vs Madan Mohan Lal Verma
Demand of illegal gratification sine qua non for constituting offence under Prevention of Corruption Act 1988-Foundational facts to be established by prosecution-Demand of illegal gratification was sine qua non for constituting an offence under the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988. Mere recovery of tainted mon [LexDoc Id : 447726]
|
SC |
2013 |
Royal Palms India (P) Ltd. vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 458030]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Shakunta Shivaji Buchade vs State of Maharashtra
[LexDoc Id : 458026]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Nalini Ramchandra Anpat vs State of Maharashtra
[LexDoc Id : 458025]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Ramija Salauddin Mulla and Mumtaj Shamshuddin Khan vs State of Maharashtra
[LexDoc Id : 458017]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Nayana Chandrakant Kamble vs State of Maharashtra
[LexDoc Id : 458006]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Vilas Tukaram Bhosale vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 458037]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Manoj Oswal vs State of Maharashtra and Sakal Papers (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 458032]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Bhupendra Govardhanlal Sachdeva and Rupinder Sardar Kundan Singh Hundal vs State of Maharashtra
[LexDoc Id : 458011]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Shaikh Juned Shaikh Moti Mansuri and Julekha Begum vs State of Maharashtra
[LexDoc Id : 458009]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Nandkishor Laxman Dhodare, Bandu Kashinath Dhanorkar, Yadav Nago Shinde, Bhaiyyaji Kawadu Wasekar, Vasant Durgaji Waghade, Manoj Bhagirath Ogilwar, Sanjay Bapuji Ogilwar, Sudhakar Kawdu Marathe and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra
[LexDoc Id : 457895]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
| |
| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| |
