| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 55 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Jyothi Prasad vs Prakasan K.V. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 575927]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2020 |
Samiyah International Builders (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs State of U.P. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 575925]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2020 |
K. Raman vs L. Francis Victor
[LexDoc Id : 575921]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2020 |
Sunita Palta and Ors. vs Kit Marketing (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 576199]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2020 |
Lal Singh Rana vs State of U.P. and Ors.
Compounding of offence-Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. Dishonour of cheuqe-Whether, matter between parties can be settled. Held, with respect to offence of dishonour of cheques, it is compensatory aspect of the remedy which s [LexDoc Id : 567414]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2020 |
Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd. vs A. Shamnad and Ors.
Acquittal from offence of dishonour of cheque-Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Validity of document-Complainant challenged acquittal of accused in private complaint under Section 138 of Act on ground that photocopy of Ext. P6 certificate allegedly is [LexDoc Id : 567413]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2020 |
Sunil vs State and Ors.
Sustainability of conviction for dishonour of cheque-Sections 138, 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Offences to be compoundable-Applicant challenged order of conviction and sentence convicting applicant for offence punishable under Section 138 of Act. Whether, conviction of app [LexDoc Id : 567412]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2020 |
Rathod Pradyumansinh Ranjitsinh vs State of Gujarat
Sustainability of conviction-Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Dishonour of cheque-Applicant challenged order of conviction and sentence convicting applicant for offence punishable under Section 138 of Act. Whether, conviction of app [LexDoc Id : 567404]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2020 |
Kamal Dev vs State Bank of India and Ors.
Conviction-Inherent jurisdiction-First Appellate Court had affirmed the judgment of conviction passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, under Section 138 read with Section 142 of [LexDoc Id : 561237]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2020 |
Johnson Francis vs T.T. Kuruvilla and Ors.
Conviction-Demanding payment-Trial court found the petitioner guilty of the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to a [LexDoc Id : 561236]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2020 |
Kamal Dev vs Ravinder Kumar and Ors.
Conviction-Demanding payment-Trial court found the petitioner guilty of the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to a [LexDoc Id : 561235]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2020 |
APS Forex Services (P) Ltd. vs Shakti International Fashion Linkers and ors.
Dishonour of cheque-Section 138, 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Presumption against negotiable instrument-Whether, order of acquittal passed by Trial Court acquitting original accused respondents for offence under Section 138 of Act sustainable. Held, once [LexDoc Id : 560921]
|
SC |
2020 |
Vincent Mathew vs State of Kerala and Ors.
Conviction-Re-appreciate evidence-Trial court found the petitioner guilty of the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to a [LexDoc Id : 561234]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2020 |
Punjab Small Industries and Export Corpn. Ltd. vs Gurinder Singh and Ors.
Conviction-Criminal legal liability-Whether, respondents rightly held to be guilty of offence punishable under Section 138 of N.I.Act. Held, present appellant is not responsible and he h [LexDoc Id : 561233]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2020 |
Hamsa K. vs Ismail P. and Ors.
Conviction-Judicial discretion-Trial court found the petitioner guilty of the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to a [LexDoc Id : 561231]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2020 |
Guddo Devi vs Bhupender Kumar
Conviction-Enforceable debt-Petitioner convicted for offence punishable under section 138 of N.I.Act, 18881. Whether, conviction of Appellant justified. Held, no material to conc [LexDoc Id : 561230]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2020 |
Ashish Narang vs State of Kerala and Ors.
Guarantee-Continuance of the security-Defendant No.1 is the proprietor of M/s J.F. Fast Food. and the defendants No.1 & 2 both are the guarantors. The defendant No.1 approached and applied [LexDoc Id : 561228]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2020 |
Rajeshbhai Muljibhai Patel and Ors. vs State of Gujarat and Ors.
Criminal complaint-Presumption-High Court has allowed Criminal Misc. Application No. 24588 of 2017 and quashed the criminal case filed by appellant No. 3 under Section 138 of N.I. A [LexDoc Id : 560890]
|
SC |
2020 |
Narendra vs Balbirsingh
Bar to suit-Cause of action-Whether prosecution of accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1888, is hit by the bar created by sub-section (2) of Section 69 o [LexDoc Id : 560822]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2020 |
Abdulkhader K.P. vs C. Pankajakshan Nambiar and Ors.
Sufficient funds-Possession for consideration-Complainant's case is that the accused in partial discharge his gross liability for an amount of Rs. 4,50,000/- issued Ext. P1 cheque dated 05.12.2004 [LexDoc Id : 560821]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2020 |
Ashish Aggarwal vs Sushil Kumar
Cross examination-Summon-Whether, trial court ought to have allowed the petitioner's application filed under Section 145(2) N.I. Act. Held, Nevertheless, the submissions made [LexDoc Id : 560819]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2020 |
Mohd. Akram vs State of U.P. and Ors.
Compounding of offence-Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. Adequate steps.-Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., has been filed with a prayer to quash summoning order. Whether, impugned order of applicant should be allowed. [LexDoc Id : 560818]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2020 |
M.S. Murali vs James George and Ors.
Re-examination-Power to summon-Case is instituted upon the complaint filed against the petitioner by the first respondent for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiab [LexDoc Id : 560817]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2020 |
M.K. Abdul Hameed vs State of Kerala and Ors.
Dismissal of complaint-Sections 138 and 203 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Unclaimed notice.-Complaint filed against the second respondent for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Act. The notice sent by him to the drawer of the che [LexDoc Id : 560816]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2020 |
Paridhi Jain vs State, Through PP
Usage of goods-Section 2(74) of CGST Act, 2017. Mining equipment.-Appellant, inter alia, is engaged into the business of after sales support for the mining equipment manufactured by its overseas group entities which [LexDoc Id : 562088]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2020 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next | Last |
| |
