| First | Prev | 11 | Last |
| Documents Found: 275 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Rama Cylinders (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 494504]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2016 |
A.M. Ahamed and Co. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 494307]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2016 |
Satish Mohan Agarwal vs CC
Penalty for improper importation of goods, etc.: Act of appellant detrimental to interest of revenue-Onus of proof discharged by revenue, Appeals dismissed-Whether the duty entitlement pass book scrips or telegraphic release advice used to discharge import duty liability were fake, forged and fabricated c [LexDoc Id : 494505]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2016 |
Banswara Syntex (P) Ltd. vs CC
Penalties for contravention, etc., not expressly mentioned-Negligence on part of appellants, Impugned order upheld, Penalty reduced-Whether imposition of penalty on the appellants under section 117 of the Customs Act 1962 was justified. Held, the appellants had not taken the approp [LexDoc Id : 494308]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2016 |
Air Customs Officer IGI New Delhi vs Pramod Kumar Dhamija
Exoneration in adjudication proceeding: Respondent declared a proclaimed offender-Non-participation in any of proceedings personally, Quashing of proceedings set aside-Whether the high court was justified in accepting the prayer for quashing of proceedings. Held, the The order in original dated referred to the statem [LexDoc Id : 494264]
|
SC |
2016 |
Hari Rai and Ors. vs CTT
Prayer for release of detained goods: Absence of proper documentation in respect of goods-Disputed questions of fact involved, Department directed to examine the claim of petitioners-Whether the prayer to order release of detained goods could be granted. Held, the petitioners were cart pullers and the question of releasing the good [LexDoc Id : 494254]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
CC vs Enterprise International Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 494221]
|
CESTAT (Calcutta) |
2016 |
CC vs Aahana Commerce (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 494219]
|
CESTAT (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Larsen and Toubro Ltd. and Ors. vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
Sealing of premises on ground of failure to produce records as demanded-Sealing action undertaken mechanically, No satisfaction arrived at by Commissioner, Impugned order set aside-Whether sealing three premises of the petitioner only on account of failure to produce the records as demanded by the notice issued under section 59 o [LexDoc Id : 493963]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Aditi Creation vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 493659]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2016 |
Allen Diesels India (P) Ltd. vs UOI and Ors.
Modification or amendment of benefit granted under a notification in the garb of a circular-Amendment to be brought about only by issuing another notification, Rejection of refund applications held bad-Whether, in the garb of a circular issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs the benefit granted under a notification issued in terms of secti [LexDoc Id : 493960]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
CC vs Vishal Surgical Equipment Co. (P) Ltd.
Classification of goods: Video Oesophago Gastroscope-Equipment based on wireless capsule and covered under Serial No. 82 of Customs Notification No. 21 dated 01 March 2002-Whether the equipment in dispute was covered under Serial No. 82 of List 37 of the Table appended to Customs Notification No. 21 dated 01 March 2002 u [LexDoc Id : 493664]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2016 |
Falcon Tyres Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 493342]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2016 |
Arun Smelters Ltd. vs CC
Imposition of penalty for misdeclaration of goods-Option of redeeming goods on payment of redemption fine not exercised, Penalty reduced-Whether penalty of Rs.3 lakhs imposed on the appellant under section 112(a) of the Customs Act 1962 could be set aside. Held, on perusal of material, [LexDoc Id : 493341]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2016 |
HS Power Projects (P) Ltd. vs CTT
Delhi Sales Tax on Works Contract Act 1999: Levy of sales tax on labour contracts-Reduced amount payable where composite works contract including a demand of labour charges-Whether the labour contracts in question could be subject to levy of sales tax under section 4, section 5 and section 6 of the Delhi Sales Tax on Work [LexDoc Id : 493248]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
CC vs Raju Copiers and Suri Graphics
[LexDoc Id : 492611]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2016 |
Futura Kitchen Sinks India (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 492605]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2016 |
Fairdeal Polychem LLP and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.
Anti-dumping: Non-conclusion of review within the period of 12 months from the dates of their initiation-Extension of time for concluding review in view of mutatis mutandis prescription in rule 23(3)-Whether the petitions seeking quashing of review proceedings on the ground that reviews had not been concluded within the period of 12 months from the [LexDoc Id : 492782]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Bimla Industries vs CCE and Ors.
Maintainability of petition filed by the proprietor of a merged firm-Settlement of all claims outstanding in the name of firm, Delay in pursuing claim-Whether the petition filed by a sole proprietor of a firm, which had merged with another company and thereby had ceased to exist, was maintainable. He [LexDoc Id : 492780]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Bathel Exim International (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 492598]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2016 |
Manawat Plastics (P) Ltd. vs CESTAT and Ors.
Denial of conversion of shipping bill: Application for conversion filed beyond stipulated time-No question of law regarding permissibility of conversion specifically raised, Appeal dismissed-Whether denial of conversion of shipping bill under Duty Exemption Entitlement Certificate Scheme to Drawback Scheme to avail export benefit was reall [LexDoc Id : 492783]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Tinna Rubber and Infrastructure Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 492614]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2016 |
M.M. Enterprises vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 492607]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2016 |
Shree Balaji Concast (P) Ltd. vs CCT
U.P. VAT Act 2008: Seizure of goods on ground that Form 21 filled up by two pens in different inks-No illegality committed by assessee in transportation of goods, Goods directed to be released forthwith-Whether the seizure order on the ground that Form 21 accompanying the goods was filled up by two pens in different inks and the entries made in one of [LexDoc Id : 492704]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2016 |
Windsor Machines Ltd. vs CCE and S.T
[LexDoc Id : 492618]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2016 |
| |
| First | Prev | 11 | Last |
| |
