First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Last |
Documents Found: 95 |
Title |
Forum |
Year |
Vishnu Vishal Paper Mills (P) Ltd. vs The State of Bihar and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 593827]
|
HC (Patna) |
2022 |
The Addl. Director General, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Kolkata Zonal Unit and Ors. vs Dec Agrotech (P) Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 593826]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2022 |
CC vs Rajkamal Industrial (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 590418]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2022 |
Rahul Bhardwaj vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 588972]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2022 |
Vinayak Cargo vs CC
Refusal to renew licence-Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013. Non compliance with provision-Appellant Custom house agent challenged rejection of renewal application. Whether CESTAT was right in law in upholding order passed by Commissioner of [LexDoc Id : 594620]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2022 |
GKB Vision Ltd. vs CC
Levy of service tax-Section 65 (97a) of the Finance Act, 1994. Site formation and clearance, excavation and earthmoving and demolition service-Appellant engaged in selling of land, upon providing adequate infrastructure facilities. Since, appellant did not get itself registered with Service T [LexDoc Id : 588395]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2022 |
Nirma Ltd. vs CC
Refund of deposit made as security to bond-Section 27 of Customs Act, 1962. Applicability of refund provisions-Appellant imported consignment of 51,723 MT Indonesian Coal and filed Bill of Entry No.08/10- 11 dated 03.02.2011 with Customs. Proper officers did no [LexDoc Id : 588350]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2022 |
Poorna Graphics, Ganesha Temple Compound and Ors. vs Jt. CC and Ors.
Validity of Show Cause Notice-Jurisdiction of issuing authority-Petitioner challenged validly of show cause notice issued. Whether, notice issued was legal and valid. Held, notice has been issued by Additional Dire [LexDoc Id : 594624]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2022 |
Nipun Miglani vs The Addl. Director General, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence and Ors.
Attachment of bank accounts-Sections 110(5), 234 of Customs Act, 1962. Proper officer-Petitioner aggrieved by attachemetn of his bank accounts. Whether, respondents have wrongly attached bank accounts of petitioner. Held, petitioner's r [LexDoc Id : 594623]
|
HC (Madras) |
2022 |
Green Gold Timbers (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 594155]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2022 |
CC vs Manjunatha Cargo (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 593829]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2022 |
ACCT vs Asha Oil Traders
[LexDoc Id : 589187]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2022 |
Sunrise Traders vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 588315]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2022 |
Numinous Impex India (P) Ltd. vs CC and ACC
[LexDoc Id : 593271]
|
HC (Madras) |
2022 |
Vageesh Umesh Jaiswal vs State of Gujarat
[LexDoc Id : 589169]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2022 |
JJR Associates and Ors. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 593129]
|
CESTAT (Calcutta) |
2022 |
Systematic India Thru. D. Mitta vs Comm. Commercial Tax
[LexDoc Id : 589173]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2022 |
A.V. Agro Products Ltd., Genex Foods (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs CCCE
[LexDoc Id : 588314]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2022 |
Arun Kumar Agarwal and Ors. vs Pr. CC
[LexDoc Id : 593131]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2022 |
Kuldeep Kaur vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 593130]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2022 |
|
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Last |
|