| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 470 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
State of A. P. and Ors. vs Twin City Jewellers Association and Ors.
Increase in tax rate-Dealers not aware of increase-Tax on jewellery could not be allowed to be levied at a lower rate merely because the dealers were not aware of the increase in the tax rate and they [LexDoc Id : 298762]
|
SC |
2004 |
Deputy Commissioner (Law), Commercial Tax vs K.N.S. Mohammed Iyoob Labbai Sahib and Sons
[LexDoc Id : 287220]
|
Kerala HC |
2004 |
Tata Consultancy Services vs State Andhra Pradesh
Validity of: Re-assessment-Non-service of notice- [LexDoc Id : 232737]
|
SC |
2004 |
Commissioner, Trade Tax vs Sri Krishna Flour Mill
[LexDoc Id : 333160]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2004 |
Malaysia Arcade Agencies vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 232607]
|
CESTAT Bangalore |
2004 |
Shanti Fragrances vs UOI and Ors.
Entries in Schedule-Pan Masala and Gutka-The inclusion of panmasala and gutkha as taxable entries in First Schedule of Delhi Sales Tax Act 197 was justified even though 'tobacco' under which [LexDoc Id : 290035]
|
Delhi HC |
2004 |
Hindustan Bone Mills (P) Ltd. vs Commissioner of Trade Tax
[LexDoc Id : 287209]
|
Allahabad HC |
2004 |
Vaibhav Laminates vs DCTO
[LexDoc Id : 333369]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2004 |
Shasun Drugs and Chemicals vs CESTAT
Modvat Credit-Indigenous inputs used in export goods-The Modvat credit taken on indigenous inputs used in export goods was reversed. There was no violation of condition V(a) of Notification No. 203-92–Cu [LexDoc Id : 295974]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2004 |
Srinivasa Electricals vs Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
Exemption on sales tax-Dry cell and dry cell batteries-On general interpretation of the text of the statute, the use of conjunction 'and' after 'pumpsets' in entry 3 of the Eight Schedule to the Karnataka [LexDoc Id : 298755]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2004 |
CIT vs Vijay Granites (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 232269]
|
Chennai HC |
2004 |
Karun Karpets (P) Ltd. vs State of Kerala
[LexDoc Id : 232031]
|
Kerala HC |
2004 |
Whirlpool of (I) Ltd. vs Authority for Clarification and Advance Rulings and Another
[LexDoc Id : 232030]
|
Karnataka HC |
2004 |
Comissioner, Sales Tax vs Kunwar Saheb and Co.
[LexDoc Id : 232029]
|
Allahabad HC |
2004 |
Balkrishna Hatcheries vs Clarification and Advance Ruling Authority
[LexDoc Id : 232028]
|
Karnataka HC |
2004 |
Commissioner, Sales Tax, U.P., Lucknow vs Arvind Agencies
[LexDoc Id : 232027]
|
Allahabad HC |
2004 |
Nagendra Prasad vs State of Bihar and Others
[LexDoc Id : 232026]
|
Patna HC |
2004 |
Kamla Prasad Mohan Lal vs Comissioner of Sales Tax, U.P., Lucknow
[LexDoc Id : 232024]
|
Allahabad HC |
2004 |
Prakash Enterprises vs State of Kerala
[LexDoc Id : 232023]
|
Kerala HC |
2004 |
Philips India Limited vs Assistant Comissioner (CT), Fast Tract Assessment Circle II, and Others
Tax liability - Additional sales tax - The qualifying taxable turnover had to be computed for the whole year and not from the date of the amendment. It was immaterial that the taxable turn... [LexDoc Id : 232022]
|
Chennai HC |
2004 |
Hindustan Wires Limited vs A.C.C.T. and Others
[LexDoc Id : 232021]
|
WBTT |
2004 |
Rai Barelly Flour Mills vs Trade Tax Tribunal
[LexDoc Id : 232019]
|
Allahabad HC |
2004 |
Durga Wine Industries vs CTO and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 333007]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2004 |
G. Poly Flex vs State of Haryana
[LexDoc Id : 333115]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2004 |
CST vs Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal
[LexDoc Id : 231470]
|
Bombay HC |
2004 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
