Orient Paper and Industries Ltd. vs State of M.P. and Ors.
Powers of the Revenue under M.P. Krishi Upaj Mandi Adhiniyam 1972-Market fee on agricultural produce-The scope of powers of the Revenue under M.P. Krishi Upaj Mandi Adhiniyam 1972, to levy market fee on agricultural produce brought in to the market ar [LexDoc Id : 304018]
Honda Motor Co Ltd. vs CST
Transfer of technical know-how-Chargeability to service tax-The assistance rendered by a non-resident company at the time of transfer of know-how related to manufacture of motor cycles to an Indian Company, was [LexDoc Id : 304830]
JCB India Ltd. vs CST
Taxability of technical consulting services-Pre-deposit of demand as condition precedent-Technical consulting services rendered by the petitioner company were liable for sales tax assessment and therefore, interim stay upon pre-deposit of [LexDoc Id : 308887]
Keltron Controls Division vs State of Kerala
Central Sales Tax-Sale price of goods-Excess price collected from the purchaser on account of exchange rate fluctuation and consequent variation in customs duty was considered to be a part [LexDoc Id : 329239]
CCE vs Birla VXL Ltd.
Discharge of export obligation-Duty Exemption Scheme-An appeal questioning the discharge of export obligation by an assessee in respect of fabrics imported under the Duty Exemption Scheme, was dismissed [LexDoc Id : 335170]
K.V. Nagarajan vs Deputy Commercial Tax Officer
Sales Tax-Works Contract-The principal had supplied raw material to the job worker and the job worker had returned the finished goods and excess raw material to the principal [LexDoc Id : 316402]
Commissioner of Commercial Tax vs Shah Gordhandas Bhikharidas and Ors.
Total sale price-Inclusion of freight charges-Freight charges shown separately in a bill and paid by a purchaser at the time of delivery could not be excluded from the total sale price of the said [LexDoc Id : 330052]
HC (Madhya Pradesh)
2006
Hyundai Motors India Ltd. vs CST
Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery-Belated show-cause notice-The Commissioner was justified in treating the appellant as service recipient for receipt of 'consulting engineer's service' from abroad as it was una [LexDoc Id : 314957]
