Register free! 
EXIM - Judgement
[ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  

 
First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 572   
Title Forum  Year
T. Subramanian vs DCTO [LexDoc Id : 428143]
HC (Chennai) 2011
H.A. Kader vs UOI and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 428070]
HC (Chennai) 2011
Modipon Ltd. vs CC [LexDoc Id : 448555]
CESTAT (Delhi) 2011
Hasmukh Parekh vs Assistant STO and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 430548]
HC (Calcutta) 2011
Deepa Panels vs State of Kerala [LexDoc Id : 413914]
SC 2011
CC vs Areva T & D India Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 455571]
HC (Madras) 2011
Addl. CST vs Sehgal Autoriders (P) Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 413642]
HC (Bombay) 2011
Assistant CTO vs Kamdhenu Spat Ltd. and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 438198]
HC (Rajasthan) 2011
Assistant Commercial Taxes Officer vs Raghuveer Singh [LexDoc Id : 429828]
HC (Rajasthan) 2011
Glaxo Smithkline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. vs State of Kerala [LexDoc Id : 429376]
HC (Kerala) 2011
First Reality vs ACCT [LexDoc Id : 429109]
HC (Karnataka) 2011
Swadeshi Polytex Ltd. vs CTT [LexDoc Id : 428145]
HC (Allahabad) 2011
Integrated Caps (P) Ltd. vs CTT [LexDoc Id : 425477]
HC (Allahabad) 2011
State of Tamil Nadu vs Elcome Surveys (P) Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 425101]
HC (Chennai) 2011
Desai Brothers Ltd. vs Addl. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes [LexDoc Id : 422778]
HC (Karnataka) 2011
Tata Communications Ltd. vs UOI and Ors. Entitlement to SFIS benefits to telecommunications providers: PIC opining foreign exchange earnings earned from optic fibre cables not entitled to SFIS benefits-Task of PIC to interpret Foreign Trade Policy and not to modify or amend the same, DGFT Circular based on PIC’s opinion quashed and set aside-The petitioner had provided dedicated bandwidth services to foreign telecommunication carriers through a continuous optic fibre cable network owned by [LexDoc Id : 413423]
HC (Bombay) 2011
Angus Jute Works of the Angus Co. Ltd. and Anr. vs Joint Commissioner and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 434119]
HC (Calcutta) 2011
B. Arjuna Raja vs State of Kerala Gross profit addition for estimation of turnover: Addition to purchase value declared by the petitioner himself-Lower than the lowest percentage of gross profit declared by similar dealers adopted, Market value of timber considered, Order accepting estimation of gross profit at 12 percent upheld -The tribunal had accepted the estimation of gross profit at 12 percent based on evidence gathered by the department from similar traders who had decla [LexDoc Id : 419216]
HC (Kerala) 2011
Vinco Colour and Ceramics vs State of Karnataka [LexDoc Id : 427072]
HC (Karnataka) 2011
Hotel President vs State of Kerala [LexDoc Id : 426515]
HC (Kerala) 2011
Nanda Forgings (P) Ltd. vs ACCT and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 443711]
WBTT 2011
Ali Singhania Bulk Carriers vs State of Karnataka [LexDoc Id : 434481]
HC (Karnataka) 2011
State of Karnataka vs N.K. Agro Oils (P) Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 419844]
HC (Karnataka) 2011
BIS-NU Chem India (P) Ltd. and Anr. vs State of West Bengal and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 438467]
WBTT 2011
Roots Multiclean Ltd. vs STO and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 437048]
WBTT 2011
 
First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last