Register free! 
EXIM - Judgement
[ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  

 
First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 358   
Title Forum  Year
Jayesh Dinesh Shah and Ors. vs Kaydee Family Trust and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 457510]
HC (Bombay) 2013
Naffar Chandra Jute Mills Ltd. vs State of West Bengal and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 449473]
HC (Calcutta) 2013
TVS Motor Co. Ltd. vs CC [LexDoc Id : 447108]
CESTAT (Chennai) 2013
Kapil Steels Ltd. vs ACCT and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 446460]
HC (Madhya Pradesh) 2013
Frost International Ltd. and Anr. vs CST and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 451787]
HC (Calcutta) 2013
Mehsana District Co-op Milk Producers' Union Ltd. vs State of Gujarat [LexDoc Id : 443510]
HC (Gujarat) 2013
Jai Singh vs Presiding Officer, Labour Court and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 442492]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2013
Interglobe Aviation Ltd. vs State of Rajasthan [LexDoc Id : 449271]
HC (Rajasthan) 2013
Indo American Hybrid Seeds India (P) Ltd. vs Additional Commissioner of Commercial Tax [LexDoc Id : 442819]
HC (Karnataka) 2013
BGR Energy Systems Ltd. vs State of Rajasthan and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 448072]
HC (Rajasthan) 2013
CC vs Crescent Enterprises [LexDoc Id : 447617]
CESTAT (Chennai) 2013
Katuri Medical College and Hospital vs CTO and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 447508]
HC (Andhra Pradesh) 2013
Bonfiglioli Transmissions (P) Ltd. vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 447429]
CESTAT (Chennai) 2013
SGS Petro Organic Ltd. vs CTO and Ors. Challenge to amendment taxing white kerosene at 25 percent: Concessional rate of duty on kerosene used for illuminating burning oil lamps-Kerosene meant for public distribution system to be taxed at four percent whereas only white kerosene meant for industrial purpose taxable at 25 percent-The single judge had dismissed the writ petitions by observing that the State Government had got every power to tax kerosene different from that of su [LexDoc Id : 441031]
HC (Madras) 2013
Hotline CPT Ltd. vs State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 446465]
HC (Madhya Pradesh) 2013
Parle Products (P) Ltd. vs State of Rajasthan and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 443616]
HC (Rajasthan) 2013
Assistant CTO vs Iqbal Khan [LexDoc Id : 452339]
HC (Rajasthan) 2013
Mavi Industrial Ltd. vs CC and CE Non-fulfilment of export obligation: Grant of extension of letter of permission-Non-fulfilment on account of bona fide reasons, Customs authorities not justified in refusing to renew warehouse licence and enforcing duty demand on ground of failure of assessee to fulfil export obligation within first block-The development commissioner by his letter dated 27 April 2009 had granted extension of letter of permission (LOP) for the second block of five years [LexDoc Id : 440956]
HC (Bombay) 2013
M.M.T.C. Ltd. vs Employees Provident Fund Organisation [LexDoc Id : 440317]
HC (Delhi) 2013
Agarwal Industries Ltd. vs Commissioner of Commercial Tax [LexDoc Id : 446461]
HC (Andhra Pradesh) 2013
Assistant CTO vs Electrolux Kelvinator Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 451783]
HC (Rajasthan) 2013
Agrimas Chemicals Ltd. vs State of Haryana and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 451022]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2013
Persys Punj Lloyd Joint Venture vs Commissioner of VAT and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 445352]
HC (Delhi) 2013
Krishna Gupta and Anr. vs Rajinder Nath and Co. Huf and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 460644]
HC (Delhi) 2013
Nithiya Rice and Sago Factory vs DCTO [LexDoc Id : 449240]
HC (Chennai) 2013
 
First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | Next | Last