Register free! 
EXIM - Judgement
[ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  

 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 225   
Title Forum  Year
Peri India (P) Ltd. vs CC [LexDoc Id : 473485]
CESTAT (Mumbai) 2014
Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd vs State of Haryana and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 468450]
CSTAA (Delhi) 2014
Dayanand Ramkrishna Shet vs State of Karnataka [LexDoc Id : 460706]
SC 2014
CC vs Keshav International [LexDoc Id : 471921]
CESTAT (Delhi) 2014
Addl. CST vs Kirloskar Copeland Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 460833]
HC (Bombay) 2014
Tata Motors Ltd. vs CCT [LexDoc Id : 461454]
HC (Allahabad) 2014
Marvel Vinyls Ltd. vs State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 468814]
HC (Madhya Pradesh) 2014
Vikram Woolens Ltd. vs State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 461779]
HC (Madhya Pradesh) 2014
Kone Elevator India (P) Ltd. vs State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. Works Contractvs Sale: Intention of contracting parties-Manufacture, supply and installation of lifts or elevators Sale and not Works Contract-Even after the 46th Constitutional Amendment, if article 366(29A)(b) of the Constitution of India was to be invoked, as a necessary concomitant, it sh [LexDoc Id : 460682]
SC 2014
Kone Elevator India (P) Ltd. vs State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 460681]
SC 2014
Satya Pal Anand vs State of Madhya Pradesh and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 460578]
SC 2014
Moser Baer India Ltd. vs State of Utter Pradesh and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 461045]
HC (Allahabad) 2014
Kumagai Skanska HCC Itochu Group vs Commissioner of Value Added Tax and Anr. Applicability of limitation prescribed in Delhi Value Added Tax Act 2004-Terms of s.106(4) clear and unequivocal and specifically dealing with purposes connected with and/or incidental to revision including prescription with regard to limitation-The petitioner’s submission that unless the prescription with regard to limitation was specifically saved, the limitation prescribed in the Delhi Valu [LexDoc Id : 460803]
HC (Delhi) 2014
Uni Colloids Impex (P) Ltd. vs CC [LexDoc Id : 461997]
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) 2014
State of Karnataka vs Asian Paints Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 461778]
HC (Karnataka) 2014
Nokia India (P) Ltd. vs Enforcement and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 472967]
HC (Madras) 2014
Birla Corpn. vs State of Madhya Pradesh [LexDoc Id : 462583]
HC (Madhya Pradesh) 2014
Allanasons Ltd. vs UOI Writ petition challenging constitutional validity-Petitioner relegated to remedy of appeal against assessment order-The constitutional validity of s.6-A of the Central Sales Tax Act 1956 could not be considered or decided in a departmental appeal. A challenge to con [LexDoc Id : 461289]
HC (Allahabad) 2014
Parle Products (P) Ltd. vs State of Maharashtra [LexDoc Id : 468133]
WBTT 2014
A.M.C. Coated Fabrics Ltd. vs State of Uttar Pradesh [LexDoc Id : 470235]
HC (Allahabad) 2014
Joyrath Projects (P) Ltd. and Anr. vs Sales Tax Officer, Alipore Charge and Ors. Appeal against pre-deposit-Amount of pre-deposit reduced to half-In an appeal against the order to pre-deposit, the dispute related to the appellant’s liability to pay service tax under the head ‘Commercial Training [LexDoc Id : 461041]
HC (Calcutta) 2014
Dewan Tyres Ltd. vs UOI [LexDoc Id : 471605]
HC (Allahabad) 2014
State of Karnataka vs Kraft Sales and Services India Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 468815]
HC (Karnataka) 2014
State of Karnataka vs Shilpi Wire Rope (P) Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 462296]
HC (Karnataka) 2014
J.N. Chaudhary and Ors. Etc. and Mount Everest Co-op House Building Society Ltd. vs State of Haryana and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 460372]
SC 2014
 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Next | Last