| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 233 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Gour Chandra Gorai and Ors. vs State of West Bengal and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 512842]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2017 |
Gobind Sugar Mills Ltd. and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 512841]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2017 |
Shiva Traders and Ors. vs Dy. Commissioner of Commercial Tax and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 512121]
|
HC (Chhattisgarh) |
2017 |
Deepak Builders vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 512837]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2017 |
McDonalds India (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs CTT and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 512124]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Kishan Lal and Co. and Ors. vs ACCT and Ors.
Jurisdictional error-Notice-Whether, jurisdictional error in orders of the learned Additional Commissioner, Commercial Tax. Held, In present case, it has already been held that d [LexDoc Id : 512122]
|
HC (Chhattisgarh) |
2017 |
Fortune Metaliks Ltd. vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 512123]
|
HC (Chhattisgarh) |
2017 |
Pranab Kumar Saha vs Food Corpn. of India and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 512906]
|
HC (Assam) |
2017 |
Pranab Kumar Saha vs Food Corpn. of India and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 512905]
|
HC (Assam) |
2017 |
Nur Uddin and Ors. vs State of Assam and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 512845]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2017 |
Reliance Industries Products and Ors. vs CTO and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 511983]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2017 |
Subrajit Das vs Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd.
Interference of Court-Article 227 of Constitution of India, 1950. Dealership agreement.-Appellate court rejected application of petitioner for direction to respondent-opposite party for supply of High Speed Diesel (HSD) and Motor Spirit ( [LexDoc Id : 511434]
|
HC (Orissa) |
2017 |
Quippo Oil and Gas Infrastructure Ltd. vs Oil and Natural Gas Corpn. Ltd. and Ors.
Imposing of condition-Performance of contract-Petitioner claim that direction should be issued to ONGC to consider its bid for a tender and also seeks a direction restraining ONGC from awarding le [LexDoc Id : 511433]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Mundhra Bullion (P) Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner (CT)
[LexDoc Id : 511432]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2017 |
Ganpati Motors vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.
Issuance of notice-Section 49 of the Chhattisgarh Value Added Tax Act, 2005. Initiation of proceedings.-Commissioner, Commercial Tax issued notice to petitioner in exercise of power conferred under Section 49 of 'the Act, 2005' for appearing before Commi [LexDoc Id : 511174]
|
HC (Chhattisgarh) |
2017 |
Fertilizer Corpn. of India Ltd. vs State of Orissa and Ors.
Rejection of application to reduce contract demand-Section 181(2) (t) (v) (w) and (x) read with Part-VI of the Electricity Act, 2003. Distribution and supply of electricity-Application filed to challenge the contractual demand raised in the bills and rejection of application filed for reduction of contract demand of 56.6 [LexDoc Id : 511376]
|
HC (Orissa) |
2017 |
State of Tamil Nadu vs Arasan Fertilizers (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 511175]
|
HC (Madras) |
2017 |
State of Tamil Nadu vs P.S.N. Spinners (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 511173]
|
HC (Madras) |
2017 |
Padmavathy Cotton Mills ca Addl. Commissioner (SMR) of Commercial Taxes
[LexDoc Id : 511172]
|
HC (Madras) |
2017 |
State of Tamil Nadu vs T. Manickam and Co.
[LexDoc Id : 511169]
|
HC (Madras) |
2017 |
Vasant Vihar Welfare Association and Ors. vs Lt. Governor of Delhi and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 511435]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Bihar Distillers and Bottlers (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs State of Bihar and Ors.
Ultra vires to Constitution-Section 2(40)(ii), Section 13, Section 23 and Section 24(1) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.Intoxicant.-Petitioners claimed that to declare Section 2(40)(ii), Section 13, Section 23 and Section 24(1) of Prohibition Act as ultra vires to Constitution and [LexDoc Id : 511430]
|
HC (Patna) |
2017 |
B. Athaulla Khan and Ors. vs State of Karnataka and Ors.
Renewal of permits-Travelling public-Whether, permits issued to petitioners were saved under relevant schemes or not and, if so saved, would they be entitled for renewal of such permits. [LexDoc Id : 511429]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2017 |
State of Tamil Nadu vs Raj Mosaic Tile Works
Execution of works contract-Liable to be taxed-AO held that dealer has not maintained proper accounts and taking note of payments effected by dealer came to the conclusion that 70% of amount paid t [LexDoc Id : 511171]
|
HC (Madras) |
2017 |
Chief Electoral Office and Ors. vs Mahalakshmi Light
Terms of contract-Interpretation-Whether, there was reasons to interfere in interpretation of terms of contract and findings of fact recorded by Arbitrator. Held, apart from not produ [LexDoc Id : 511431]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
