| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 201 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Cache Peripherals (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 545919]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2019 |
Clues Network (P) Ltd. vs L'oreal and Ors.
Permanent injunction-Infringement of trademark-Suit was for permanent injunction to restrain the Defendants from using manufacturing, marketing, stopping, selling, displaying, advertising through i [LexDoc Id : 540511]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2019 |
Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Haryana vs Lafarge India Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 539916]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2019 |
Channel Vas Services India (P) Ltd. vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 540509]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2019 |
Boby Sebastian vs State of Kerala and Ors.
Re-tender-Cancellation-2nd respondent invited a tender as per Ext. P1 dated 15.10.2018 for installation of rail fencing from Koodalkkadavu to Palvelicham, having a stretch o [LexDoc Id : 540507]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2019 |
Sher Singh vs State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors.
Extended time-Vigilance investigation-Claimant is the convener of the beneficiary committee, for doing the works of Vattakarikkakam - Kanjikkal road. He executed an agreement with third re [LexDoc Id : 540524]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2019 |
Dr. D.J. De'souza vs Managing Director, CPC, Diagnostics (P) Ltd.
Pre-installation-Quotation-Appellant placed an order for purchase of TurboChem 100 Unit in response to quotation submitted by the respondent in the second week of August 2015. T [LexDoc Id : 538978]
|
SC |
2019 |
Mathura Construction and Ors. vs State of Bihar and Ors.
Corporate debtor-Supply of goods-Appellant claimed in the Application that the Corporate Debtor is a special purpose vehicle company incorporated for execution of project, that is, re [LexDoc Id : 540167]
|
HC (Patna) |
2019 |
Aarpee Infra Projects (P) Ltd. vs State of Bihar and Ors.
Imposition of Penalty-Charge of connivance-Penalty was imposed on Appellants for violation of Regulations 3 and 4 of Securities and Exchange Board of India (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair [LexDoc Id : 540166]
|
HC (Patna) |
2019 |
Achal Industries vs State of Karnataka
Recoveries-Qualitative difference-Whether, recoveries were sought to be made on basis of report of CTEO. Held, there is qualitative difference in items included in Recovery Statement N [LexDoc Id : 539049]
|
SC |
2019 |
Abhijeet Enterprise Ltd. vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 545321]
|
ITAT (Calcutta) |
2019 |
Bhasin Infotech and Infrastructure (P) Ltd. vs Ahmad Main and Ors.
Extended time-Vigilance investigation-Claimant is the convener of the beneficiary committee, for doing the works of Vattakarikkakam - Kanjikkal road. He executed an agreement with third re [LexDoc Id : 540177]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2019 |
Kingfisher Capital CLO Ltd. vs CIT and Ors.
Exemption-Entitlement for benefit-Petitioner is a Government Company engaged in the manufacture of electric transformers of various capacities. It is a joint venture between the Govern [LexDoc Id : 540170]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2019 |
R.S. Construction vs State of Bihar and Ors.
Liability of paying toll-Executed by contractor-Respondent- Contractor Malaysian company was awarded contract for "Rehabilitation and upgrading lane configuration in State of Rajasthan. Whether, Fin [LexDoc Id : 540169]
|
HC (Patna) |
2019 |
Hindustan Unilever Ltd. vs Emami Ltd.
Disparaging the goodwil-Injunction-Application filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC seeking an injunction to restrain the defendant from issuing or telecasting the impugned television [LexDoc Id : 540168]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2019 |
Max Ventures Investments Holdings (P) Ltd. vs ITO and Ors.
Addition-Undisclosed income-Whether, CIT(A) erred in law and on facts of the case in restricting the additions and giving a relief of certain sum to the applicant out of the tota [LexDoc Id : 540067]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2019 |
C. Prathapan vs State of Kerala and Ors.
Delay and laches-Allotment of shares-1st respondent is the Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013 and 2nd to 6th respondents are the members of the joint family of the appella [LexDoc Id : 540332]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2019 |
Ambrish Shivhare vs State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 540330]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2019 |
Rajesh Parmar vs Under Secretary, Petroleum Corpn. and Ors.
Imposition of Penalty-Regulation 4(2)(t) of SEBI Act, 1992.-Appellants are directors in a company known as PACL Limited which was engaged in mobilizing funds from the general public by sponsoring various scheme [LexDoc Id : 540175]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2019 |
CTO vs Prasoon Enterprises
Barred by limitation-Cause of action-Whether, case of petitioner was barred by limitation. Held, cause of action on which his claims are premised had arisen in October, 2009. However, adm [LexDoc Id : 539050]
|
SC |
2019 |
Laxyo Energy Ltd. vs UOI and Ors.
Tender-Bidding process-Appellant agreed to allot to Respondents commercial shop bearing No. 104 on LG floor with an approximate Super Area of 705.09 sq. ft. in the shopping [LexDoc Id : 540333]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2019 |
Ravi Pal, In re. vs All India Sugar Trade Association (AISTA) and Praful Jagjivandas Vithalani
[LexDoc Id : 550477]
|
MISC |
2019 |
DCIT vs Rajendra Agarwal
Question of law-Section 260A (3) of Income Tax Act, 1961. At time of hearing.-Need to remand these appeals is called for because from the perusal of the order, High Court observed, "Assessee has raised the following questions of [LexDoc Id : 540022]
|
ITAT (Jaipur) |
2019 |
Ajay Agrawal vs DCIT
DCIT vs Ajay Agrawal
Addition-Stay Application-Assessing officer is of the view that the nature of addition resulting in the disputed demand is such that payment of a lump sum amount higher than 15 [LexDoc Id : 540020]
|
ITAT (Jaipur) |
2019 |
DCIT vs Jyoti Agarwal
Bogus transaction-Accommodation-Whether, CIT (A) erred in holding that the contention of the assessee cannot be accepted in view of SLPs admitted in various cases. Held, CIT (A) was [LexDoc Id : 540019]
|
ITAT (Jaipur) |
2019 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Next | Last |
| |
