| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 490 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
B.P.D. Pai and Ors. vs Sydicate Bank and Ors.
Departmental inquiry: Charges levelled against petitioner grave and serious-Sufficient time to seek defence assistance not granted, Breach of principles of natural justice-Whether refusing the request of petitioner to adjourn the proceedings and thereby not granting him sufficient time to seek defence assistance amounted [LexDoc Id : 513212]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2017 |
Northern Railway and Ors. vs Ashok Kumar
Legality of departmental inquiry: Unauthorized absence from service-Punishment of removal from service shockingly disproportionate to misconduct, Impugned order modified-Whether the inquiry conducted by the inquiry officer was unfair and illegal. Held, once the respondent had appeared himself in inquiry proceedings and [LexDoc Id : 513999]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
A. Nagarajan vs Government of Tamil Nadu and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 513996]
|
HC (Madras) |
2017 |
Madho Singh vs State of Punjab and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 513618]
|
SC |
2017 |
Navinchandra Becharbhai Patel vs UOI and Ors.
Denial of benefit under Lateral Advancement Scheme: Promotion refused by petitioner-Benefit not available, Application dismissed-Whether the tribunal was justified in denying the petitioner's claims for benefit under the Lateral Advancement Scheme on his continuing at the level [LexDoc Id : 513255]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2017 |
M.M. Swami Sirsikar and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Revision of non-practising allowance: Financial constraints-Retirement before cut off date, No right accruing to claim revision in pensionable pay-Whether the State justified its decision to grant non-practising allowance w.e.f. 01 October 1998 and whether the petitioners (who retired in between [LexDoc Id : 513250]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2017 |
Mrigank Johri and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.
Determination of seniority: Seniority based on terms and conditions of absorption-Acceptance of terms and conditions, Challenge to seniority list after its finalisation, Claim time barred-Whether the Office Memorandum, which generally provided for the benefit of service rendered in the previous cadre in an equivalent post on being absor [LexDoc Id : 513620]
|
SC |
2017 |
Raja Ram vs UOI and Ors.
Challenge to order of tribunal by unsuccessful candidate: Petitioner not aggrieved at the time of short listing of candidates-Principles of waiver, acquiescence and estoppels operating against the petitioner-Whether the order directing the Union Public Service Commission to consider the experience certificates issued by the Andaman and Nicobar Administrati [LexDoc Id : 513261]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2017 |
Girishbhai Bavalbhai Patel vs UOI and Ors.
Prayer to set aside chargesheet and consequent inquiry-Proceedings not to be delayed indefinitely awaiting outcome of criminal case-Whether the prayer to direct the respondents not to proceed further with the departmental inquiry initiated against the petitioner until the case befo [LexDoc Id : 513245]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2017 |
State of Rajasthan and Ors. vs Chandra Shekhar Dave and Ors.
Rajasthan Educational Service Rules 1970: Harmonious interpretation of rule 6 and rule 9-Prescription of promotion as method of recruitment, Schedule fixing quota from two different reservoirs-Whether the single judge had correctly opined that both rule 6(2) and rule 9(1)(c) of the Rajasthan Educational Service Rules 1970 were meant to deal [LexDoc Id : 513213]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2017 |
Cavalier Detective Security Services vs Bharath Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and Ors.
Minimum Wages Act 1948: Claims-Power of authority under section 20(1)-Whether section 20(3) of the Minimum Wages Act 1948 clothed the authority with no power to direct the employer to compensate the workmen for the lapse [LexDoc Id : 514003]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2017 |
Ram Kumar Gupta vs UOI and Ors.
Maintainability of writ petition: Petitioner a whole time officer with National Cadet Corps-Jurisdiction for subject matter lying before Central Administrative Tribunal-Whether the petitioner could be directed to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal for the reliefs prayed for in the writ petition. Held, after [LexDoc Id : 513263]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2017 |
Ningam Siro and Ors. vs State of Manipur and Ors.
Inter-se seniority: Petitioners and respondents not appointed in the same recruitment year-Principles of dovetailing not applicable, Direction to maintain status quo-Whether the inter-se seniority between the petitioners and the respondents had been properly and correctly determined in the impugned seniority lists. [LexDoc Id : 513256]
|
HC (Meghalaya) |
2017 |
Rajendran vs Commissioner of Police and Ors.
Charge memo: Acquittal from criminal case-No valid reason to interfere with departmental proceedings-Whether the charge memo issued to the petitioner could be quashed on the ground that on the very same set of facts the criminal court had held that th [LexDoc Id : 513262]
|
HC (Madras) |
2017 |
PWD Employees' Union and Ors. vs State of Gujarat and Ors.
Prayers for regularisation of service and payment of minimum wages-Highly disputed questions of facts involved, Alternative statutory remedies not exhausted-Whether the prayers, inter alia, seeking directions against the second respondent to regularize the services of petitioners, to pay them minimum wages [LexDoc Id : 513259]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2017 |
PWD Employees Union and Ors. vs State of Gujarat and Ors.
Maintainability of writ petitions: Prayer for payment of minimum wages-Highly disputed questions of facts involved, Alternative statutory remedies not exhausted-Whether the prayer to direct the respondents to ensure that the minimum wages prevalent in the State were paid to the petitioners could be allowed. He [LexDoc Id : 513258]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2017 |
Jayeshkumar J. Bhatt vs State of Gujarat and Ors.
Prayer for regularisation of services: Appointment on ad-hoc, temporary or contractual basis-Such employees having no right to seek a writ commanding the State to frame regularisation scheme-Whether the respondent authorities could be directed to consider the petitioners' case for regularization and grant them all the benefits granted to r [LexDoc Id : 513247]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2017 |
Dharam Raj vs Akshay Pant and Ors.
Appeal against the consent order: Application for correction, deletion and expunction disposed of on consent-Appeal against consent order not lying on the principles of section 96(3) of Civil Procedure Code 1908-Whether the appeal against the consent order was tenable. Held, a litigant should approach the same judge before it faded from his memory the events t [LexDoc Id : 513214]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2017 |
Adappa M. Banni vs State of Karnataka and Ors.
Modification of quantum of punishment: Order passed after application of mind-Findings based on sound principles of law, No interference warranted-Whether dismissal of application filed against the modification of quantum of punishment of reduction in pay to minimum of the pay scale for three yea [LexDoc Id : 513211]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2017 |
Gujarat Alkalies and Chemicals Ltd. vs Alkalies and Chemicals Ltd. Officers Friends Association and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 514008]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2017 |
University and College Laboratory Staff Federation of West Bengal vs State of West Bengal and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 513470]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2017 |
State of Bihar vs Om Prakash Diwakar and Ors.
Quashing of dismissal order: Entitlement to back wages-Setting aside of dismissal not fully exonerating the employee of charges against him-Whether the single judge had correctly held the respondent entitled to salary and allowances for the period of his dismissal from service till his rei [LexDoc Id : 513257]
|
HC (Jharkhand) |
2017 |
Mintu Mondal vs UOI and Ors.
Removal from service: Colour blindness-Disqualification enforced after being recruited, Impugned memo permanently stayed-Whether the respondents {(Border Security Force (BSF)} were justified in removing the petitioner from his service as a Constable (General Duty) on the [LexDoc Id : 513252]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2017 |
Child Development Project Officer vs Edait Jhigaben and Ors.
Post of anganwadi worker: Appointment only to local based candidate or daughter-in-law of village-First respondent married to other village, Judgment directing consideration of her eligibility set aside-Whether the order of single judge directing the authority to consider the first respondent as eligible for the post of anganwadi worker for a center a [LexDoc Id : 513215]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2017 |
Viscount Ahongsangbam and Ors. vs State of Manipur and Ors.
Engagement purely on contract basis on payment of monthly remuneration-Non-applicability of rule 49 of Bar Council of India Rules-Whether, having regard to the fact that the sixth and seventh respondents were engaged as OSD (Legal) on contract basis on payment of monthly remunera [LexDoc Id : 513204]
|
HC (Meghalaya) |
2017 |
| |
| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| |
