First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
Documents Found: 490 |
Title |
Forum |
Year |
Ramaprasad R. vs State of Karnataka and Ors.
Quashing of notification: Mala fide intention of respondents-Charge already taken by third respondent before issuance of notification-Whether the tribunal was justified in quashing the impugned notification. Held, the facts noted by the tribunal clearly manifested that the impugned n [LexDoc Id : 513135]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2017 |
Nishikant Narayan Kale vs Bajaj Tempo Ltd.
Specific performance of contract: No breach committed in matter of termination of services-No case made out against computation or grant of monetary relief-Whether the courts below were right in holding that it was a contract of personal service, which was not enforceable in law. Held, in the facts of the [LexDoc Id : 513131]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2017 |
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board and Ors. vs M. Balaiyan
Direction to re-fix seniority: Re-transfer to same post under same class and same category in same Board Office-Seniority not lost on re-transfer, Original seniority countable for fixation of seniority on transfer-Whether the single judge had correctly directed the appellants to re-fix the seniority of respondent by taking into account his original seniority as [LexDoc Id : 513126]
|
HC (Madras) |
2017 |
Principal Controller of Defence Accounts and Ors. vs L. Narahari
Re-fixation of pay: Entitlement to benefit of revised option-Option exercised, FR 22 not providing for second or revised option-Whether, on re-fixation of pay, the respondent was entitled for the benefit of revised option under FR 22(I)(a)(1) and FR 23. Held, it was evident fro [LexDoc Id : 513125]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2017 |
K.V. Srinivasan and Ors. vs State of Tamil Nadu and Ors.
Protection of seniority of Health Inspectors Grade I: Order of Supreme Court attaining finality-Challenge made to seniority given to erstwhile Leprosy Inspectors already considered by Supreme Court-Whether seniority of Health Inspectors Grade I as on 01 August 1997 should be protected. Held, when the Supreme Court as well as the Division Bench of [LexDoc Id : 513120]
|
HC (Madras) |
2017 |
Gurumayum Dayananda Sharma vs State of Manipur and Ors.
Refusal to give appointment-Validity and correctness of entire recruitment process and subsequent appointments pending before Supreme Court-Whether disposal of representation of the petitioner by regretting to give appointment to the post of primary teacher was valid. Held, since the valid [LexDoc Id : 513119]
|
HC (Meghalaya) |
2017 |
Girishbhai Jivrajbhai Dave vs Bhavnagar Municipal Corpn. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 512972]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2017 |
C.V. Linimol and Ors. vs Malappuram Co-op Spinning Mills and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 512964]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2017 |
Brahm Pal Singh vs State of Uttarakhand
[LexDoc Id : 512962]
|
HC (Uttarakhand) |
2017 |
Babulal Purushottamdas Bosia vs Deesa Nagarpalika and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 512929]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2017 |
Babu Ram vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 512928]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Sannasi vs Government of Tamilnadu Planning and Development Department and Ors.
Decline of request to alter date of birth: Inordinate delay of 13 years-Petition dismissed on ground of delay and laches-Whether the second respondent was justified in declining the petitioner's request to alter the date of birth of the petitioner. Held, the second respo [LexDoc Id : 513138]
|
HC (Madras) |
2017 |
Mariappan and Ors. vs Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Secretariat and Ors.
Transfer to another municipality: Transfer on deputation basis-Transfer order passed by non-competent authority, No opportunity of hearing given-Whether the order by which the petitioners, who were working as junior engineers in Dindigul Municipal Corporation, were transferred and posted on dep [LexDoc Id : 513129]
|
HC (Madras) |
2017 |
M.A. Charles vs Accountant General (Accounts and Entitlements) and Ors.
Disbursement of service benefits of deceased government employee-Nominee having no objection for disbursement of whole amount payable to parents of deceased-Whether the parents of deceased female government servant were entitled to receive the service benefits of their deceased daughter in view of nominati [LexDoc Id : 513128]
|
HC (Madras) |
2017 |
UOI and Ors. vs Giriyappa
[LexDoc Id : 512973]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2017 |
G. Alagarsamy vs Tamil Nadu State Transport Corpn. (Kumbakonam) Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 512970]
|
HC (Madras) |
2017 |
Bramha Nand Yadav vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 512963]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2017 |
S. Ponmozhi vs State of Tamil Nadu and Ors.
Refixing and reducing of pension amount-Petitioner not out on notice, Proceedings set aside-Whether the fifth respondent was justified in refixing and reducing pension amount due and payable. Held, a perusal of the impugned communication sent [LexDoc Id : 513137]
|
HC (Madras) |
2017 |
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner vs KLE Society's Law College
Delay in deposit of provident fund dues: Imposition of damages or penalty not automatic-No penalty for alleged delay imposable with retrospective effect-Whether the tribunal had correctly set aside the imposition of penalty or damages under section 14B of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneou [LexDoc Id : 513124]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2017 |
Basant Tiles vs Basappa Gadigeppa Kusugal Kelagin Maddi and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 512930]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2017 |
Anilkumar P.V. and Ors. vs Kerala Public Service Commission and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 512927]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2017 |
V.K. Gupta vs High Court of Allahabad and Ors.
Fixation of pay scale: Telex and Telephone Operators placed in cadre of Lower Division Assistant-Ample powers of Chief Justice to frame rules to regulate service conditions-Whether the prayer seeking to command the opposite parties not to place the Telex and Telephone Operators in the cadre of Lower Division Assistant in [LexDoc Id : 513203]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2017 |
Satish Chandra vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
Demotion in service: Decision taken as per preposition laid down by Apex Court-Catch up rule applicable in absence of any provision for consequential seniority in relevant rules-Whether the orders whereby the seniority of petitioner as well as other engineers had been determined and published in the official website were tenab [LexDoc Id : 513199]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2017 |
Ravinder Kumar vs UOI and Ors.
Selection to post under OBC category: Legal effect of undertaking signed by petitioner-Status and certificate not in dispute, Directions issued to process petitioner's candidature-Whether the petitioner, who had appeared in the examination under the OBC category and procured the requisite and valid certificate as per the require [LexDoc Id : 513136]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Nitu Masih vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
Teaching experience: Actual experience gained while teaching neither reducible nor extendable-Legal requirement duly met, Fresh orders directed to be passed-Whether the period from July 2014 to December 2014 was liable to be excluded while calculating the period of teaching experience. Held, the specific c [LexDoc Id : 513132]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2017 |
|
First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
|