| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 294 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
P.B. Asia Ltd. vs DIT
[LexDoc Id : 424906]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
Tiong Woon Project and Contracting Pte. Ltd., In re
Income deemed to accrue in India-Execution of projects in India, Period of project-Where the non-resident had entered into more than one projects, there could be no aggregation of duration if projects were separate. Duration of any s [LexDoc Id : 417554]
|
AAR |
2011 |
Standard Chartered Bank vs DDIT
[LexDoc Id : 453418]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
ADIT vs ICICI Bank Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 435194]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
Dredging International N.V. vs ADIT
Powers of DRP (Dispute Resolution panel)-Going beyond objections raised-Ay-2006-2007. The DRP has powers only to issue directions in respect of objections raised by assessee to the draft order. The DRP cannot go beyond the [LexDoc Id : 421540]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
Carlton Overseas (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 418075]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
GIL Mauritius Holdings Ltd. vs ADIT
[LexDoc Id : 417997]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
FIS Global Business Solutions India (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 417878]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
Standard Chartered Bank vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 417607]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
Indian Social Action Forum (INSAF) vs UOI
Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Rules 2011: Challenge to rule 3-Rule 3 within the scope of purview of rule making power, Rules not ultra vires the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act 2010-The provisions of rule 3 of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Rules 2011 effectuated s.3(1)(f) and s.5(1) of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) [LexDoc Id : 416818]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
DCIT vs Hope India Polishing Works (P) Ltd.
Computation of Increase labour charges-Processing diamonds-Ay-2005-2006, 2006-2007. The assesses was doing job-work for processing of diamonds. The labour charges as compared to last year had gone up. From thi [LexDoc Id : 423090]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
Four Soft Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 421087]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2011 |
Reuters Ltd. Construction House vs JCIT
Rectification if mistake-View of Tribunal-The view of the Tribunal on interpretation of a Article of the DTAA could not be said to be an apparent mistake
S.254(2) of the Income Tax Act 19 [LexDoc Id : 418815]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
LG Polymers India (P) Ltd. vs Addl. CIT
Computation of: ALP-Sub- licence to use trade mark ‘LG’-Ay-2006-2007. The assessee, manufacturing certain type of polystyrene. It was a 100% subsidiary of LGC(I). The LGC(I) was a 100% subsidiary of LGC, Ko [LexDoc Id : 419122]
|
ITAT (Vishakapatnam) |
2011 |
Otto Bilz (India) (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 427931]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2011 |
Dresser-Rand India (P) Ltd. vs Addl. CIT
Reasonableness of expenditure-Payment to parent company-On facts nothing was shown that amount paid to parent company was excessive. No part of it could be disallowed.
S.40A(2) of the Income Tax Act 1 [LexDoc Id : 417221]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
ACIT vs Tara Ultimo (P) Ltd.
ALP-C P M – Application of:
Transaction basis-Ay-2004-2003. The C P M Method can be applied on transaction basis and not on global basis. The C P M method requires comparison of mark-up on cos [LexDoc Id : 417020]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
Dresser-Rand India (P) Ltd. vs Addl. CIT
[LexDoc Id : 416382]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
Diageo India (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
Business expenditure-Purchase of: Software-The assessee purchased routine business application software. It was revenue expenditure.
S.37(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961. [LexDoc Id : 416120]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
CISCO Systems India (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
Computation of: ALP-Product replacement services-The assessee was in software development, marketing support services and product replacement services. It’s parent, a U.S. company entered into an ag [LexDoc Id : 423087]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2011 |
Rolls Royce PLC vs DIT
DIT vs Rolls Royce PLC
Income deemed to accrue in India-Income attributable to PE-Ay- 1997-1998 to 2003-2004. The Tribunal found that the assessee had a business connection and a PE in India in the name of RRIL. The Tribunal attribu [LexDoc Id : 416698]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
Rolls Royce Singapore (P) Ltd. vs ADIT
ADIT vs Rolls Royce Singapore (P) Ltd.
PE of Non-resident-Agent vis-à-vis PE-A.Y. 2001-02 to 2003-04.
The assessee co. was incorporated in Singapore. It was selling spares of oil-field equipments etc. It was also rendering [LexDoc Id : 416337]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
Samsung Heavy Industries Co. Ltd. vs Addl. DIT
[LexDoc Id : 415837]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
DDIT vs Mustaq Ahmad Vakil
Income deemed to accrue in India-Short-term capital gains-Ay- 2007-08.
The assessee was a resident of Dubai, UAE. He was entitled to benefit of Art 13(3) of DTAA with UAE in respect of short-term capit [LexDoc Id : 417552]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
DCIT vs RBS Equities India Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 415879]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
