| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 294 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Addl. DIT vs TII Team Telecom International (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 415813]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
Liberty Agri Products (P) Ltd. vs ITO
ALP: Computation of-Cup-Method Vis-Custom Tarrif Rate -Ay-2006-2007. The assessee followed CUP-Method while computing ALP of deals with AEs. The Custom Tarrif Rate for imports from an AE as on destination, [LexDoc Id : 423183]
|
ITAT (Chennai) |
2011 |
Drilbits International (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 420985]
|
ITAT (Pune) |
2011 |
Joint Stock Co. Zangas vs ADIT
[LexDoc Id : 417548]
|
ITAT (Ahmedabad) |
2011 |
Dish India Ltd. vs ACIT
Bad-debts-Claim made on wrong facts-Ay-2006-2007. The assessee wrote off interest receivable from company ‘DL’ on ground that the company had discontinued business and it’s directors wer [LexDoc Id : 417275]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
Emersons Process Management India (P) Ltd. vs Addl. CIT
[LexDoc Id : 417015]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
ACIT vs Schlafhorst Marketing Co. Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 416437]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
General Electric Co. vs DDIT and Ors.
Agent of the non-resident-Assessment of agent of non- resident -Ay-2005-2006. The Indian company’s shares were transferred by non-resident. For asstt. of non-resident income in agent’s hands only as regards income [LexDoc Id : 415834]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
ITO vs Bajaj Hindustan Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 415804]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
Verizon Data Services India (P) Ltd. vs Authority for Advance Rulings and Ors.
Fees for Included Services [FTS]-Employees seconded by Parent Co.-The assessee was a 100% subsidiary of a Co. 'VDA' of USA. It provided services of development and maintenance of communication software. It made payme [LexDoc Id : 432412]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2011 |
Inautix Technologies India (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
ACIT vs Inautix Technologies India (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 418593]
|
ITAT (Chennai) |
2011 |
Columbia Sportswear Co., In re
Income deemed to accrue in India-Buisness connection, Liason office vis-a-vis PE-The assessee a company of USA was engaged in manufacturing and selling sportwear had a liason office in India for identifying competent manufacturers [LexDoc Id : 414687]
|
AAR |
2011 |
Genisys Integrating Systems India (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 427538]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2011 |
Wringley India (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 420983]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
Wrigley India (P) Ltd. vs Addl. CIT
[LexDoc Id : 418009]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
ING Vysya Bank Ltd. vs DDIT
'Royalty'-Payment for: License to use software of non-resident company-A.Y. 2008-09.
The assessee under an agreement with a Swiss co. acquired a license to use it's software programme on a lump sum payment. The payme [LexDoc Id : 416026]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2011 |
Nina Padma Singh vs UOI and Ors.
Maintainability of writ petition: Challenge to order deleting penalties by contending non-impleadment in appeal-Petitioner not a necessary or a proper party in appeal, Impugned order further appealable before high court, Alternative remedy available, Petition not maintainable-The Enforcement Directorate (ED) had levied penalties on fourth respondent-bank and seventh respondent for granting of loan to the petitioner-NRI, who [LexDoc Id : 414798]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
Foster Pty. Ltd., In re
Pendency of proceedings-Proceeding pending in payer’s case-The question of disallowance of payment made to non-resident u/s 40(a)(i) was pending in appeal by the payer. The question of liability of non-residen [LexDoc Id : 419689]
|
AAR |
2011 |
Foster (P) Ltd., In re
Maintenance of application for Advance Ruling-Pendency of proceedings before I.T. authority-The question raised by the Applicant was whether payment received by it was ‘royalty’ under A 12 of the DTAA. of Australia. This question was pending [LexDoc Id : 417079]
|
AAR |
2011 |
DIT vs Income Tax Settlement Commissioner and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 417585]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2011 |
Wipro GE Health Care (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 439757]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2011 |
Wipro GE Health Care (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
Duty of : Dispute Resolution Panel ( DRP)-Considering assessee’s objection-The DRP could not accept findings of TPO without considering assessee’s objections in a judicious manner. The order of DRP was not valid.
S.144C [LexDoc Id : 417425]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2011 |
Nippon Kaiji Kyokoi vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 415636]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
DCIT vs Mitsui O.S.K. Lines Maritime India (P) Ltd.
Computation of: ALP-Ship management for foreign principals-Ay-2003-2004. The assessee was in ship management for it’s foreign principals. The assessee gave data of comparables for f.y 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 [LexDoc Id : 418813]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
CIT vs Reiter Inglostadt Spinners Imaechinanbau A.G.
Liability to pay - Advance-tax-Entire income liable for TDS-A.Y. 1991-92, 94-95.
The assessee was a non-resident. It's entire income was liable to TDS u/s 195. It had no liability to pay advance-tax. So, n [LexDoc Id : 445410]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2011 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
