Register free! 
Forex - Judgement
[ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  

 
First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 477   
Title Forum  Year
Agence France Presse (AFP) vs DCIT [LexDoc Id : 497387]
ITAT (Delhi) 2016
DDIT vs Mitsubishi Motors Corpn. Taxability of income from transfer of shares-Section 112(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Rate of tax-The assessee had applied tax rate of 10% in the terms of the proviso to section 112(1) of the Act. The AO has applied tax rate of 20% on the ground th [LexDoc Id : 497396]
ITAT (Delhi) 2016
Alcatel-Lucent France and Ors. vs ADIT and Ors. Validity of re-opening of assessment-Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Income escaping assessment-The assessees challenged the notices issued by the Income-tax Department under Section 148 of the Act seeking to reopen the assessments and orders all [LexDoc Id : 497638]
HC (Delhi) 2016
DIT vs International Global Networsk B V [LexDoc Id : 498142]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2016
J. Murugan and Ors. vs Govt. of Tamil Nadu and Ors. Challenge to notice auctioning fishing rights: Fishermen given rights even to participate in auction and also to share income-Mandatory condition in notice for employment of fishermen living in and around that area, Petition dismissed-Whether because of the promise given in the year 1958 for the then fishermen to create sufficient opportunity for fishing rights, the present G.O. Ms. [LexDoc Id : 497409]
HC (Chennai) 2016
Binapani Bhattacharjee and Ors. vs Bana Bihari Bhattacharjee and Ors. Fraudulent transfer of factory license: Jurisdiction of civil court-Case proved by first respondent, Suit not barred by limitation, Appeal dismissed-Whether the appellate court was justified in declaring that the transfer of factory license in the name of fourth defendant (appellant) was made fraud [LexDoc Id : 497405]
HC (Gauhati) 2016
United Online Software Development (India) (P) Ltd. vs ITO Transfer Pricing- selection of comparables-Determination of Arm's Length Price-The assessee challenged the transfer pricing adjustment made to Arm's Length Price ("ALP") in respect of provision of software services to Associated [LexDoc Id : 497343]
ITAT (Hyderabad) 2016
Rolls-Royce India (P) Ltd. vs DCIT Transfer pricing- selection of comparable-Determination of Arms Length Price-The assessee challenged the TP process conducted by the TPO and holding that support services activities in nature by treating them and comparing it w [LexDoc Id : 497341]
ITAT (Delhi) 2016
NEC Technologies India Ltd. vs Addl. CIT [LexDoc Id : 497216]
ITAT (Delhi) 2016
Lumax Industries Ltd. vs DCIT [LexDoc Id : 497215]
ITAT (Delhi) 2016
Korn Ferry International (P) Ltd. vs DCIT [LexDoc Id : 497214]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2016
COWI India (P) Ltd. vs ACIT [LexDoc Id : 497213]
ITAT (Delhi) 2016
Worlds Window Impex India (P) Ltd. vs ACIT [LexDoc Id : 496947]
ITAT (Delhi) 2016
DHL Logistics (P) Ltd. vs DCIT [LexDoc Id : 496946]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2016
Rupinderpal Singh vs Bharat Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. and Ors. Allotment of LPG distributorship: Filing of false information by third respondent-Violation of clause 6(vii) of Guidelines for Selection of Regular LPG Distributors 2013, Allotment cancelled-Whether allotment of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) distributorship in favour of third respondent was justified. Held, once it was clear that there was [LexDoc Id : 497415]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2016
Vertex Customer Services India (P) Ltd. vs DCIT Transfer pricing- selection of comparable-Determination of Arms Length Price-The assessee challenged the transfer pricing adjustment made on the basis of the comparables selected by TPO. Whether, the comparables selected were c [LexDoc Id : 497402]
ITAT (Delhi) 2016
Syngenta Biosciences (P) Ltd. vs DCIT Adjustment of Arms Length Price-Rule 10 B(4) of the Income-tax rules 1962. Selection of comparables-The assessee was against the order of CIT (A) confirming the action of AO in making adjustment of Arms Length Price (ALP) determined by the assessee i [LexDoc Id : 497342]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2016
Swarovski India (P) Ltd. vs DCIT [LexDoc Id : 497223]
ITAT (Delhi) 2016
P. Prasanna vs District Collector Madurai and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 497413]
HC (Chennai) 2016
Suraksha Diagnostic (P) Ltd. vs State of Bihar and Ors. Blacklisting order: MOU not executed between parties-Request for proposal also not authorising respondents to pass an order of blacklisting, Impugned order quashed-Whether the order by which the petitioner had been made to forfeit the earnest money deposited by it by way of bank guarantees, the request for propos [LexDoc Id : 497568]
HC (Patna) 2016
Subash Chandra Mund vs State of Odisha and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 497566]
HC (Orissa) 2016
S.N. Bose and Co. vs Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd. and Ors. Challenge to tender process: None of the tenderers having certificates of registration on the date of submission of tender papers-Cancellation of tender to cost considerable public money and time, Acceptance of applications justified-Whether the first and second respondents had waived a statutory requirement while conducting the tender process. Held, admittedly, on the date of subm [LexDoc Id : 497416]
HC (Calcutta) 2016
Abhi Engg. Corpn. (P) Ltd. vs NTPC Ltd. Return of bid security: Bank guarantee not as per bidding documents-Petitioner having knowledge of mistake committed, Petition dismissed-Whether the respondent was justified in returning the bid security offered by the petitioner in the form of bank guarantee on the ground that the bid [LexDoc Id : 497404]
HC (Delhi) 2016
DCIT vs Reebok India Co. [LexDoc Id : 496984]
ITAT (Delhi) 2016
G. Velayutham Asari vs Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment and Ors. Sale of property in auction-Findings of lower courts based on facts, Appeal dismissed-Whether the lower appellate court was justified in denying the reliefs to the appellant on the ground that the first and second respondents had follow [LexDoc Id : 497137]
HC (Chennai) 2016
 
First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last