| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 477 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Brahamputra Reality Services (P) Ltd. vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
Property purchased in auction: Demand of transfer fee and insistence on execution of fresh lease deed-Automatic termination of lease on change in constitution of lessee, Petitioner duty bound to get lease deed executed in its favour-Whether the respondents were justified in demanding transfer fee from the petitioner as well as insisting on execution of fresh lease deed. The petiti [LexDoc Id : 497136]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2016 |
Asha Mishra vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
Electromagnetic field radiations : Emissions minuscule and not warranting anxiety or fear-No ground to warrant restraint upon establishment of mobile towers, Conditions of license not breached, Reliefs denied-Whether the contention of petitioners including those related to the deleterious effect of electromagnetic field (EMF) radiation upon human health and [LexDoc Id : 497135]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2016 |
Seagram Manufacturing (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
ACIT vs Seagram Manufacturing (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 496575]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2016 |
Honda Motorcycle and Scooter India (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 496564]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2016 |
Genpact Services LLC(India Branch) vs ADIT
[LexDoc Id : 496562]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2016 |
DCIT vs D.B. International(Asia) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 496559]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2016 |
C3i Support Services (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 496523]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2016 |
Asahi Glass Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 505994]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2016 |
Geo Miller and Co. (P) Ltd. vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.
Rejection of bid as non-responsive: Omission to supply full details and particulars-Material facts not disclosed in petition, No infirmity in decision making process, Petition dismissed-Whether the second respondent was justified in holding that technical bid submitted by the petitioner was non-responsive and, thus, did not qualify fo [LexDoc Id : 496787]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2016 |
Commissioner, Delhi Value Added Tax vs ABB Ltd.
Exemption from tax: Transactions constituting inter-State trade and those constituting sale or purchase in the course of import-Movement of goods by way of imports or by way of inter-State trade in pursuance of contract between parties, Appeals dismissed-Whether the high court was justified in holding that transactions constituting inter-State trade and those constituting sale or purchase in the course [LexDoc Id : 496607]
|
SC |
2016 |
Omax Engg. Works vs State of Haryana and Ors.
Blacklisting and forfeiture of earnest money: Second show cause notice issued in respect of same offences based on identical facts-Decision taken in first show cause notice disposed of in its entirety and attaining finality, Blacklisting order quashed-Whether the orders blacklisting the petitioners and forfeiting their earnest money were justified and whether it was permissible for a second show cau [LexDoc Id : 496793]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2016 |
UOI and Ors. vs Waterfront Constructions (P) Ltd.
Participation in tender process: Disqualification order set aside by single judge-Basic requirement of special condition of contract not fulfilled, Certificate claiming eligibility of no help, Appeal allowed-Whether the single judge was justified in holding that the respondent was qualified to participate in the financial bid and setting aside the order di [LexDoc Id : 496800]
|
HC (Patna) |
2016 |
Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd. and Ors. vs Veenu Malhotra
[LexDoc Id : 496799]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2016 |
Rajesh Kumar and Ors. vs State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors.
Enlistment Rules: Scope of judicial review-Rules changed after about 50 years considering the changed circumstances, Petitions dismissed-Whether the high court could interfere with the issuance of enlistment of Contractor Rules, particularly rule 8.1 thereof whereby a contractor in a pa [LexDoc Id : 496794]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2016 |
N. Rathinasamy vs Societies and Ors.
Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act 1983: Surcharge proceedings-Factual findings re-appreciated by tribunal, Conduct of petitioners willful, Petitions dismissed-Whether the challenge to surcharge proceedings initiated under section 87 of the Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act 1983 as confirmed by the tribuna [LexDoc Id : 496791]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Kishan Seva Cold Storage (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs Bihar State Electricity Board and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 496790]
|
HC (Patna) |
2016 |
JCB India Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 505987]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2016 |
Nisar Sons and Ors. vs Ministry of Revenue and Forest, Mantralaya and Ors.
Cancellation of allotment of sand ghats: Petitioners in business of sand excavation-Participation in such auctions even in past, Necessary facts not pointed out, Petitions dismissed-Whether cancellation of allotment of sand ghats in petitioner's favour was justified. The high court had earlier issued notice in the matter and, whil [LexDoc Id : 496792]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Katwa Udyog Ltd. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 496789]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2016 |
Agros Impex India (P) Ltd. vs State of Jharkhand and Ors.
Termination of agreement: Scope of judicial review-Disputed questions of facts involved, Challenge to termination not determinable in exercise of writ jurisdiction-Whether the impugned administrative action of cancellation of agreement for execution of work of supply and affixation of high security registration p [LexDoc Id : 496782]
|
HC (Jharkhand) |
2016 |
ACIT vs Dana India Technical Centre (P) Ltd.
Selection of comparables-Transfer pricing adjustment-The assessee challenged the inclusion and exclusion of certain comparables form the list of comparables. Whether, the comparables selected were compar [LexDoc Id : 496386]
|
ITAT (Pune) |
2016 |
Cummins Turbo Technologies Ltd. vs DDIT
Selection of comparables-Transfer pricing adjustment-The assessee challenged the directions of DRP in confirming the Accentia Technologies Ltd., Crossdomain Solutions Ltd., Cosmic Global Ltd., Eclerx Ser [LexDoc Id : 496385]
|
ITAT (Pune) |
2016 |
Ashok Sah vs State of Bihar and Ors.
Bihar Excise Act 1915: Cancellation of licences by Collector-Superintendent of Excise alone having jurisdiction to suspend, cancel or impose penalty, Impugned order quashed-Whether the Collector, in his purported exercise of power under section 42 of the Bihar Excise Act 1915, was justified in cancelling the licences held [LexDoc Id : 496783]
|
HC (Patna) |
2016 |
Soliton Technologies (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
Set off of loss of non STPI unit-Section 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Computation of deduction-The set off of loss on non STPI unit with the profit of the STPI unit was challenged herein. Whether, the CIT (A) erred in confirming the order of AO [LexDoc Id : 496390]
|
ITAT (Chennai) |
2016 |
Ramanjot Singh vs State of Punjab and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 496795]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2016 |
| |
| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| |
