| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 477 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Sri Ram Food Industries vs State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors.
Power of judicial review-Non-awarding of tender-Petitioner firm aggrieved by non-awarding of tender despite it being lowest tenderer. Whether, in facts and circumstances of case power of Judicial Re [LexDoc Id : 505063]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2016 |
Seth Industrial Corpn. vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.
Cancellation of Tender Documents-Condition of turnover-Petitioner-partnership sought issuance of writ, order or direction in nature of prohibition restraining respondent from in any manner whatsoever proce [LexDoc Id : 505061]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2016 |
Nirlac Chemicals and Ors. vs Haffkine Bio-Pharmaceutical Corpn. Ltd. and Ors.
Rejection of bid-Tender-Respondent No. 1 rejected "techno-commercial" bid of petitioners in relation to tender floated for supply of "Bivalent Oral Polio Vaccine Bulk" ["bOPV [LexDoc Id : 505030]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Jyoti Thakur vs Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 504984]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2016 |
Shirin Foods Limited and Ors. vs Kolkata Municipal Corpn. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 505062]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2016 |
ITO vs Marsh India (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 506061]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2016 |
DCIT vs Zinser Textile Systems (P) Ltd.
Zinser Textile Systems (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 506060]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2016 |
Consortium of Titagarh Firema Adler S.P.A.-Titagarh Wagons Ltd. vs Nagpur Metro Rail Corpn. Ltd. and Ors.
Opening Price-Malafides-Present petition filed to sought direction to respondent no. 1 to declare respondent No. 2 as disqualified and declare that opening of price of respon [LexDoc Id : 505028]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Sesa International Ltd. and Ors. vs Director General of Foreign Trade and Ors.
Re-submission of license-Status quo of order-Petitioner was directed to re-submitted concerned license by impugned order. Whether, impugn order is arbitrary, illegal, issued in violation of princ [LexDoc Id : 504515]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Monnet Ispat and Energy Ltd. and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.
Validity of tender process-Bidder participant-Petitioner challenged tender process regarding coal block auctions. Whether, in facts and circumstances of case petitioner was justified in challengin [LexDoc Id : 504372]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
DCIT vs T.M. International Logistic Ltd.
T.M. International Logistic Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 506381]
|
ITAT (Calcutta) |
2016 |
BG India Energy (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 506379]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2016 |
Chhatisgarh Power and Coal Beneficiation Ltd. and Ors. vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.
Tender Notice-Article 14, Article 19(1)(g) and Article 21 of Constitution of India, 1950. Violative of Constitution.-Rajasthan Vidhyut Utpadan Nigam Ltd. (RVUN), floated tender for supply of 2.0 Lac MT per month of Raw Coal and supply of washed coal to Chhabra Therma [LexDoc Id : 504369]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2016 |
Shri Vishnu Eatables India Ltd. vs DCIT and Ors.
International transactions-Stall proceedings-Petitioner sought relief on ground that provisions of Chapter-X of Act were not applicable to international transactions undertaken by petitioner as t [LexDoc Id : 505127]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2016 |
Sistema Shyam Teleservices Ltd. and Ors. vs Reliance Communication Ltd.
Sanction to scheme of arrangement-Section 180 of Companies Act, 2013. Transfer of telecom business.-Petitioner sought sanction of scheme of arrangement for transfer of telecom business undertaking of Transferor Company to Transferee company on an ong [LexDoc Id : 504479]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2016 |
Vitthal Agro Exports and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 504343]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Montecarlo Ltd. vs NTPC Ltd.
Rejection of tender-Qualifying requirements for tender-The petitioner challenged the rejection of its tender. Whether, the proposal/bid of the petitioner was responsive to the qualifying requirements set o [LexDoc Id : 504336]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Harmanprit Singh Sidhu vs Arcadia Shares and Stock Brokers (P) Ltd.
Application for condonation of delay-Section 34 and Section 37(1) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.Re-filling.-Application for delay which was filed under Section 5 of Act had been allowed by single judge by virtue of impugned order. Whether, impugned order by [LexDoc Id : 504292]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Eurocoustic Products Ltd. vs UOI and Ors.
Non-selection-Adoption of unfair treatment-Petitioner was not selected by respondent in pre-qualification level. Whether, respondents was adopted any irrational approach in not selecting petiti [LexDoc Id : 504288]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Balasaheb and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 504284]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
ACIT vs Dow Agrosciences India (P) Ltd.
Dow Agrosciences India (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
Claim of bad debt-Section 36(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Books of accounts.-Whether, CIT(A) was justified in allowed claimed of bad debts which was disallowed by AO. Held, AO disallowed claim on reasoning that assessee has not [LexDoc Id : 506264]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2016 |
Sri Venkateswara Service Station vs Bharat Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. and Ors.
Termination of dealership-Section 201 of Indian Contract Act, 1872. Validity of order.-Petitioner challenged order of termination of his temporary dealership.Whether, order of termination was not passed in accordance with law. Held, as p [LexDoc Id : 505064]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Rani Soni and Ors. vs Indian Oil Corpn. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 505059]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2016 |
Abhay Gas Agency vs Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd. and Ors.
Termination of distributorship agreement-Revoking the termination-The distributorship was terminated by respondent IOC, dispute of which referred to sole Arbitrator. Arbitrator held that that action of termination of [LexDoc Id : 504977]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2016 |
Sri Venkateswara Service Station vs Bharat Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. and Ors.
Termination of temporary dealership-Validity of termination order-The petitioner challenged the order of the termination of dealership and prayed for quashing the same and for directing the respondent to resume the s [LexDoc Id : 504342]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
