| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 477 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Vaigai Club vs Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corpn. Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 502031]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Ranjit Recreation Club vs Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corpn. Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 502025]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Ornate Labs (P) Ltd. vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
Disqualified for Bid-Financial Bid-Petitioner's bid was found to be ineligible and, therefore, his financial bid has not been considered. Allegation against petitioner was that he had f [LexDoc Id : 501988]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2016 |
Super Cassettes Industries (P) Ltd. vs Goldy Dish Antenna and Ors.
Copyright-Section 7 of Commercial Courts Act. Section 4 of the Delhi High Court (Amendment) Act. Jurisdiction.-Plaintiff filed suits to restrain defendant in each of the suits from broadcasting or otherwise communicating to public cinematograph films, sound re [LexDoc Id : 501980]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Arindam Singh Roy vs State of West Bengal and Ors.
Permanent bar license-Article 14 of Constitution of India, 1950. Guarantee of equality.-Whether, prayer sought by petitioner for writ of mandamus directing respondents to grant permanent Bar License, for his restaurant should be allowed. [LexDoc Id : 501801]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Transpac Asia (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
Inclusion of Purchase Cost in Operating Cost-Remand proceedings-Assessee aggrieved in respect of purchase cost again included as part of operating cost by TPO in remand proceedings. Whether, TPO as well as AO was h [LexDoc Id : 502292]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2016 |
Gofrugal Technologies (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 502287]
|
ITAT (Chennai) |
2016 |
AMD Research and Development Centre India (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 501525]
|
ITAT (Ahmedabad) |
2016 |
Adobe Systems India (P) Ltd. vs JCIT
JCIT vs Adobe Systems India (P) Ltd.
Comparable-Exclusion-Assessee objected inclusion of APTICO Ltd. on ground that company was providing non-comparable services and no segmental results have been provided. W [LexDoc Id : 502286]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2016 |
DCIT vs United Helicharters (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 501828]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2016 |
Roca Bathroom Products (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 501827]
|
ITAT (Chennai) |
2016 |
Nava Bharat Ventures Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 501691]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2016 |
Komal Construction and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Rejection of tender-Disqualified-Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 in rejecting tender of petitioners at the stage of opening of Envelope No. 1. Whether, respondent nos. 1 to 4 rightly disqualif [LexDoc Id : 501510]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Swaminathan Ravichandran vs ITO
Resident as eligible-Section 5(2) of Income Tax Act,1961. Article 15(1) and Article 23 of India-China DTAA. Claim.-Whether, assessee eligible to claim relief under article 15(1) of India-China DTAA. Held, since assessee is non-resident and as per Article 23 of DTAA [LexDoc Id : 501179]
|
ITAT (Chennai) |
2016 |
Foxteq Services India (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 501619]
|
ITAT (Chennai) |
2016 |
Govind Bajirao Navpute vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Validity of notification in respect of draft Development Plan prepared-Section 21(1), Section 26(1) and Section 28 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. Deviations from Act.-Notification was published in Official Gazette under Section 21(1) of MRTP Act calling objections in respect of draft Development Plan prepared and p [LexDoc Id : 501540]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
ACIT vs Bilag Industries (P) Ltd.
Deletion of adjustment-Transaction Net Margin Method-Assesse apply transaction net margin method (TNMM) using operating margin as profit level indicator. Whether, order of lower appellate order justified [LexDoc Id : 501293]
|
ITAT (Ahmedabad) |
2016 |
Zuari Cement Ltd. vs ACIT
Depreciation-Section 32 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Additional Depreciation.-Assessing Officer allowed normal depreciation on assets of appellant and later additional depreciation also allowed. Whether, depreciation rightly all [LexDoc Id : 501180]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2016 |
Vipul Manharlal Shah and Ors. vs State of Gujarat and Ors.
Constitutional validity of provisions-Sections 6(2), 8, 27(1), 28(1) and 28(2) (c) of the Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1963. Rule 48, 56 and 57 of the Gujarat Agricultural Produce Market Rules, 1965. Collection of market fee-The Petition filed to challenge the provisions under Sections 6(2), 8, 27(1), 28(1) and 28(2) (c) of the Act, 1963 and Rules 48, 56 and 57 of the Rule [LexDoc Id : 501524]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2016 |
Nahar Singh Chaudhary vs State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors.
Collection of market fee as arrears of land revenue-Rule 82 of the H.P. Agricultural Produce Market Rules, 1971. Validity of demand notice-Petitioner challenged the issuance of Demand Notice issued by Respondent No. 2 i.e. Marketing Committee (Shimla and Kinnaur) for recovery of market fe [LexDoc Id : 501515]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2016 |
C. Elangovan vs Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd. and Ors.
Rejection of bid-Tender-Second respondent, vide E-mail communication dated 27.05.2016, informed petitioner that tender submitted by his late wife has been rejected due to tec [LexDoc Id : 501505]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Superintendent of Police and Ors. vs Villupuram Salai Ora Viyabarigal Pothu Nala Sangam and Ors.
Hawking business: Implementation of Act as regards Villupuram Town in very advanced stage-No further orders necessary, Petition closed-
Whether the petition praying to allow running of business of hawking in pursuance of an earlier judgment whereby the members of petitioner were [LexDoc Id : 501164]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Subhash Chandra Upadhyay and Ors. vs Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. and Ors.
Request for cancellation of allotment of retail outlet dealership-Entire things engineered by petitioner to defeat rights of another candidate, Petitions dismissed-
Whether the high court could accept the request of petitioner, who was insisting that candidature of another candidate in all eventuality was li [LexDoc Id : 501163]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2016 |
M. Selvam vs Municipal Corpn. and Ors.
Challenge to tender process: Failure of petitioner to substantiate averments in petition-Tender conducted in accordance with rules and regulations, Petition dismissed-
Whether the petition seeking certiorarified mandamus to call for records pertaining to the tender called for collection of fees and the subseque [LexDoc Id : 501159]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Steria India Ltd. vs CIT and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 501215]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
