| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 163 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Rajeev Agarwal vs SEBI, Bayer CropScience AG, Aventis Crop Science India Ltd., Ambit Corporate Finance Pvt. Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 300303]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2006 |
P. Gopinath vs SEBI, Bayer CropScience AG, Aventis Crop Science India Ltd, Ambit Corporate Finance Pvt. Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 300294]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2006 |
Indian Syntans Investments (P) Ltd vs Bayer CropScience A.G.
Acquisiton of shareholding-Offer Price-SEBI was found right in approving draft letter of offer in so far as the price of the shares was concerned. The price offered being significantly high [LexDoc Id : 298776]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2006 |
Bansal Sharevest Services Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 300204]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2006 |
Vikas WSP Ltd vs Securities and Exchange Board of India
[LexDoc Id : 300536]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2006 |
B.M.Gandhi Securities Pvt. Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 300203]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2006 |
K. Anjaneya Raju vs SEBI, Engineers India Ltd., National Stock Exchange of India Ltd., Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Ministry of Company Affairs
[LexDoc Id : 300206]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2006 |
Dilip S. Pendse vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 300193]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2006 |
Monica Electronics Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 300247]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2006 |
Hardy Oil Pvt Ltd vs Securities and Exchange Board of India, Burren Energy India Ltd, Unocal Bharat Ltd
[LexDoc Id : 300197]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2006 |
J.B.Shares Stocks Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 300543]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2006 |
Nipra Stock Broking Pvt. Ltd. vs SEBI, National Stock Exchange of India Ltd., Bombay Stock Exchange Ltd., Gujarat State Petronet Ltd., Karvy Computershare Pvt. Ltd., Kotak Mahindra Capital Company Ltd., HSBC Securities and Capital Markets (India) Pvt. Lt
[LexDoc Id : 300250]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2006 |
Saurin T. Parikh vs Stock Exchange and Anr.
Investor Protection Fund-Release of fund-The release of the funds from the Investor Protection Fund was discretionary and was essentially meant for the benefit of small investors. The remedy [LexDoc Id : 296549]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2006 |
Paramount Bio-tech Industries Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 290767]
|
SAT Mumbai |
2006 |
Rolex Finvest Pvt. Ltd. vs Whole Time Member, SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 300407]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2006 |
Rolex Finvest (P) Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 290764]
|
SAT Mumbai |
2006 |
Ohm Stock Broker (P) Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 290797]
|
SAT Mumbai |
2006 |
Vision Technology India Ltd vs Securities and Exchange Board of India
[LexDoc Id : 300538]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2006 |
Urvish R. Vora, Pallavi U. Vora vs Whole Time Member, SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 300248]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2006 |
Consortium Securities (P) Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 300205]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2006 |
Urvish R. Vora, Pallavi U. Vora vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 290802]
|
SAT Mumbai |
2006 |
Paark Securities vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 290800]
|
SAT Mumbai |
2006 |
SPS Share Brokers Pvt.Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 300414]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2006 |
Bipin R. Vora vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 290765]
|
SAT Mumbai |
2006 |
Phiroze Sethna Pvt. Ltd., Jost's Engg. Pvt. Ltd., Burjor Hurmusji Reporter, Aloo Burjor Reporter vs SEBI, Adjudicating Officer
[LexDoc Id : 300297]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2006 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Next | Last |
| |
