| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 244 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Krishna Filaments Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 384385]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2010 |
Vatsa Corpn. Ltd. vs Stock Exchange
[LexDoc Id : 384398]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2010 |
Netanand Bhambu, Sarvani Choudhary, Netanand Surajram Bhambu-HUF, Anand Netanand Choudhary-HUF and Vinita Choudhary vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 384389]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2010 |
Vinayak Trimbak Sarkhot vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 384402]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2010 |
Vikas Ganeshmal Bengani vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 384400]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2010 |
Mansukh Securities and Finance Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 384387]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2010 |
Bhanuben Jaisukhlal Shah vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 384378]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2010 |
R.D. Goel and Co. (P) Ltd. vs Nitco Roadways (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 384407]
|
NCDRC |
2010 |
Shreehari Hira Stock Broking (P) Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 384394]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2010 |
Ideal Carpets Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 384383]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2010 |
Ashok Narayan Waje vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 384376]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2010 |
Victory Trading vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 384399]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2010 |
Vikas Ganeshmal Bengani vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 384401]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2010 |
SEBI vs Ajay Agarwal
Provisions of s.11B procedural and could be applied retrospectively-Complaint alleging mis-statement in prospectus during public issue-The provisions of s.11B of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act 1992, being procedural in nature, could be applied retrospectively. Even if [LexDoc Id : 382271]
|
SC |
2010 |
SMIFS Capital Markets Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 384395]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2010 |
PGF Ltd., Nirmal Singh Bhangoo, Balvir Singh, Gurjant Singh, Harchand Singh and Prem Seth vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 384390]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2010 |
Milan Purana vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 384388]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2010 |
Jagruti Securities Limited. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 384384]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2010 |
Ajmera Associates Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 384374]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2010 |
ITO vs Stock and Bond Trading Co.
[LexDoc Id : 420194]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2010 |
Pushpa Builders Ltd. vs Avi Om Gupta, Shree Om Gupta and Radha Gupta
[LexDoc Id : 384406]
|
NCDRC |
2010 |
Tripti Vyapar (P) Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 384396]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2010 |
OPG Securities (P) Ltd. vs SEBI and Bombay Stock Exchange Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 381538]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2010 |
Vishnu Prakash Bajpai vs SEBI
Inherent powers of high court: Quashing of criminal complaint-High court not expected to appreciate and weigh evidence-A company was operating Collective Investment Schemes and had raised certain sum from general public. The company neither applied for registration wit [LexDoc Id : 381411]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
Triumph International Finance India Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 384397]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2010 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
