Register free! 
Trademark - Judgement
[ 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 ]  

 
First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 77   
Title Forum  Year
A.D. Padmasingh Isaac Trading as Aachi Spices and Foods and Ors. vs Kanmani Masala Accounts of profits-Ex-parte evidence-Plaintiff sought direction to defendant to render accounts of profits made by defendant on account of usage of trademark of plaintiffs by defendant is [LexDoc Id : 507131]
HC (Chennai) 2016
Mother Dairy Fruit and Vegetable (P) Ltd. vs S.K. Raheem and Ors. Infringement of trademark-Permanent injunction-Trademark ‘MOTHER DAIRY" registered in name of plaintiff. Plaintiff sought reliefs of permanent injunction, damages, rendition of accounts, delivery u [LexDoc Id : 507135]
HC (Delhi) 2016
AZ Tech India and Ors. vs Intex Technologies India Ltd. and Ors. Ad interim injunction-Expenditure-Plaintiffs sought ad interim injunction against defendants from using trademark 'AQUA'. Whether, ad interim injunction as sought by plaintiff should b [LexDoc Id : 507132]
HC (Delhi) 2016
Prius Auto Industries Ltd. and Ors. vs Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha [LexDoc Id : 507148]
HC (Delhi) 2016
Rx Infotech (P) Ltd. vs Gopinath T. and Ors. Permanent injunction-Deceptive similarity-Plaintiff sought decree of permanent injunction restraining defendants from directly or indirectly doing business in any goods and services under trad [LexDoc Id : 507150]
HC (Delhi) 2016
Pepsico Inc. and Ors. vs Sagarnil Enterprise and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 507146]
HC (Delhi) 2016
QRG Enterprises and Ors. vs HPL India Ltd. and Ors. Fixation of fee-Recording of evidence-Plaintiffs sought for fixing fee of Local Commissioner and for direction for recording evidence on day-to-day basis. Whether, relief sought by plainti [LexDoc Id : 507149]
HC (Delhi) 2016
Piruz Khambatta and Ors. vs Rajmohan Rupaji Modi and Ors. Permanent injunction-Invoked jurisdiction-Plaintiff sought reliefs in nature of permanent injunction, rendition of accounts, damages etc. it primarily being an action arising out of infringeme [LexDoc Id : 507147]
HC (Delhi) 2016
Daystar Television Network India (P) Ltd. vs Word of God Fellowship, Inc.,/d/b/a/Daystar Television Network and Ors. Permanent injunction-Non-appointment of chairperson-Appellant sought decree of permanent injunction restraining defendants claiming through or under them from in any manner infringing plaintiff's regist [LexDoc Id : 507133]
HC (Chennai) 2016
A.D. Padmasingh Isaac Trading as Aachi Spices and Foods and Ors. vs Aachi Hot Chips Accounts of profits-Ex-parte evidence-Plaintiff sought direction to defendant to render accounts of profits made by defendant on account of usage of trademark of plaintiffs by defendant is [LexDoc Id : 507130]
HC (Chennai) 2016
Tata Sons Ltd. vs Ram Niwas and Ors. Permanent injunction-Deceptive similarity-Plaintiff sought decree of permanent injunction restraining defendants from directly or indirectly dealing in business of providing transport; packagi [LexDoc Id : 507151]
HC (Delhi) 2016
Maheshwari Tea Co. (P) Ltd. vs Vijay Shree Tea Co. [LexDoc Id : 507134]
HC (Rajasthan) 2016
Asianet Communications Ltd. and Ors. vs SUN T.V. Network Ltd. and Ors. Permanent injunction-Preponderance of probalities-Plaintiff sought copyright in respect of picture 'AHAM' through Satellite Television and for permanent injunction from in any manner infringing their [LexDoc Id : 506225]
HC (Chennai) 2016
Aura Synergy India (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs New Age False Ceiling Co. (P) Ltd. and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 506227]
HC (Delhi) 2016
Rasiklal Manikchand Dhariwal and Ors. vs Kishore Wadhwani and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 505959]
HC (Bombay) 2016
Bajoria Appliances (P) Ltd. vs Kinova Home Appliances (P) Ltd. and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 505953]
HC (Calcutta) 2016
Shriram EPC Ltd. vs Soma Enterprises Ltd. Liability to pay damages-Nominal damages-Whether, defendant is liable to pay damages, it has been decided that that defendant must be restrained by an order of injunction from infringing plai [LexDoc Id : 505961]
HC (Chennai) 2016
Cadila Healthcare Ltd. vs P. Ramu Permanent injunction-Infringement of copyright-Plaintiffs sought permanent injunction, restraining by an order of perpetual injunction, defendant from infringing or using in relation to any medicin [LexDoc Id : 505954]
HC (Chennai) 2016
Apex Laboratories Ltd. vs India Pharmaceuticals Permanent injunction-Infringement of copyright-Plaintiffs sought permanent injunction restraining defendants from committing an infringement of plaintiff's Copy right in artistic work 'ZINCOVIT' la [LexDoc Id : 505952]
HC (Chennai) 2016
ELI Lilly and Co. and Ors. vs Maiden Pharmaceuticals Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 505956]
HC (Delhi) 2016
KRBL Ltd. vs PK Overseas (P) Ltd. Rejection of application-Order 7 Rule 10 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908. Interim injunction.-Trial Court rejects appellant's application for interim injunction and dismisses respondent-defendant's application under Order 7 Rule 10 of CPC on ba [LexDoc Id : 505955]
HC (Delhi) 2016
Aktiebolaget Volvo and Ors. vs Hari Satya Lubricants and Ors. Deceptive similarity-Permanent injunction-Plaintiffs sought order for permanent injunction restraining defendants from manufacturing, selling, offering for sale in India, and supplying of lubr [LexDoc Id : 505951]
HC (Delhi) 2016
Financial Times Ltd. and Ors. vs Times Publishing House Ltd. and Ors. Dismissal of application-Opportunity to cross-examine-IPAB dismissed application of TPHL for opportunity to cross-examine deponent of affidavit by way of evidence filed by FTL. Whether, IPAB was justified [LexDoc Id : 504480]
HC (Delhi) 2016
P.K. Overseas (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs Bhagwati Lecto Vegetarians Exports (P) Ltd. and Ors. Passing off-Dismissal of Suit-Suit filed by respondent/plaintiff on an action for passing off of trademarks 'India Salaam' and 'Al Habib' was dismissed. Whether, respondent’s suit [LexDoc Id : 504425]
HC (Delhi) 2016
Bausch and Lomb Incorporated vs UOI and Ors. Nature of Rules-Rule 50 of Trade Marks Rules, 2002. Mandatory or Directory.-Respondent No. 2 rejected application of petitioner on ground that respondent No. 2 has no power and that provisions of Rule 50 of Rules are mandatory [LexDoc Id : 504419]
HC (Gujarat) 2016
 
First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next | Last