| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 446 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
CTT vs Dharmex (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 353310]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2008 |
Hasmukh Parekh vs Assistant STO
[LexDoc Id : 430554]
|
WBTT |
2008 |
Ajit Singh vs Assistant Sales Tax Officer and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 405399]
|
WBTT |
2008 |
Eastern Electrics and Chakrapani Oil and Rice Mills vs State of Tamil Nadu
[LexDoc Id : 365365]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2008 |
S. Rukmangathan vs CTO vs Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 386435]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2008 |
State of Kerala vs Millenium Polypackers and Processors (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 354234]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2008 |
Darshini Textiles vs CTO
[LexDoc Id : 406581]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2008 |
R.K. Herbals vs State of Tamil Nadu
Appeal to appellate tribunal: Additional plea-Tribunals refusal to consider additional plea not justified-The provisions of s.36(3) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act 1959 empowered the tribunal ‘to pass orders as it thinks fit’. The words were the sa [LexDoc Id : 371449]
|
HC (Madras) |
2008 |
CTT vs S.S. Ayodhya Distillery and Ors.
Interpretation of taxing statutes: Two different meanings to be assigned to two expressions used ordinarily-Assessee not to suffer for an ambiguous tax entry in notification-Two different meanings should be assigned to two expressions having been used ordinarily. If by reason of a notification, taxes were sought to be impo [LexDoc Id : 351732]
|
SC |
2008 |
Sreenivas and Co. vs State of Tamil Nadu
[LexDoc Id : 406545]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2008 |
Bangalore Club vs ACCT and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 404718]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2008 |
State of Tamil Nadu vs Kurukenmutti a Estate
[LexDoc Id : 383186]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2008 |
Patwa Brothers vs State of Gujarat
[LexDoc Id : 355319]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2008 |
State of Bihar and Ors. vs United Distillers (P) Ltd. and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 371447]
|
HC (Patna) |
2008 |
State of Kerala vs Malabar Regional Co-op. Milk Producers Union Ltd.
Classification of Sambharam: Addition of ginger, etc. to buttermilk-Mere addition not to change commodity-The high court, on a question whether by adding of green chilli, ginger and a pinch of salt to buttermilk would change the character of buttermilk to [LexDoc Id : 367947]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2008 |
AMBA Carbonisation (P) Ltd. vs State of Bihar and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 383359]
|
HC (Patna) |
2008 |
Assotech Super Tech vs State of Uttarakhand and Deputy Commissioner, (Ka, Ni), Sale Tax Department, Rudrapur
[LexDoc Id : 353912]
|
HC (Uttarakhand) |
2008 |
Ghatge Patil Transport Ltd. vs Commissioner Commercial Taxes and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 406534]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2008 |
Kakada Ramprasad Sweel Stall vs State of Tamil Nadu
[LexDoc Id : 406578]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2008 |
State of Tamil Nadu vs State Trading Corpn. of India
[LexDoc Id : 404725]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2008 |
Lipton India Ltd. vs State of U.P. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 364608]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2008 |
Delkon India (P) Ltd. vs STO and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 363148]
|
HC (Orissa) |
2008 |
G.P. Ceramics (P) Ltd. vs Commissioner, Trade Tax
[LexDoc Id : 350548]
|
SC |
2008 |
Corporation Bank vs Saraswati Abharansala and Anr.
Interpretation of statutes-Construction of statute leading to confusion to be avoided-The statute should be read in the manner so as to do justice to the parties. If it was to be held, without there being any statutory provision, that t [LexDoc Id : 350547]
|
SC |
2008 |
Andhra Agencies vs State of Andhra Pradesh
[LexDoc Id : 350546]
|
SC |
2008 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
