Register free! 
VAT - Judgement
[ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  

 
First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 465   
Title Forum  Year
Deepak Radios (P) Ltd. vs Union Territory of Chandigarh and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 361121]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2009
Swastik Pipes Ltd. vs State of Haryana [LexDoc Id : 409850]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2009
Kisan Tractors vs State of Haryana [LexDoc Id : 373028]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2009
State of Haryana vs Liberty Enterprises Tax exemption under Haryana General Sales Tax Rules-Notional tax liability-Export sales were not includible while calculating notional sales tax liability for the purpose of ascertaining the limit of tax exemption or defermen [LexDoc Id : 359176]
SC 2009
Adarsha Electricals vs Addl. CCT [LexDoc Id : 404706]
HC (Karnataka) 2009
CTO vs Marudhara Motors [LexDoc Id : 360592]
HC (Rajasthan) 2009
S. Narmadha vs Assistant Commissioner [LexDoc Id : 388096]
HC (Chennai) 2009
Assistant Commissioner and Ors. vs Hindalco Industries Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 375983]
HC (Kerala) 2009
A.S. Mohammad Shareef and Co. and Anr. vs State of Tamil Nadu and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 371183]
HC (Chennai) 2009
Girnar Impex Ltd. vs State of Punjab and Ors. Rectification of mistake-Question of limitation-The high court dismissed the assessee's appeal stating that the question of limitation was a mixed question of fact and law. Moreover, tis issue had n [LexDoc Id : 365780]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2009
Meenachil Rubber Marketing and Processing Co-op. Society Ltd. vs CTO and Ors. Circular 16 of 1998 treating field latex and centrifuged latex as one and the same commodity-Rubber in all its forms made taxable at the point of last purchase in the State-Circular 16 of 1998 stated that from 01 April 1988 field latex and centrifuged latex would be treated as one and the same commodity. As the Department [LexDoc Id : 383432]
HC (Kerala) 2009
Pepsico India Holding (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 381169]
HC (Chennai) 2009
SAP India (P) Ltd. vs State of Karnataka and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 367538]
HC (Karnataka) 2009
Solar Cashew vs State of Kerala [LexDoc Id : 405449]
HC (Kerala) 2009
Haru Adhikari vs State of Kerala [LexDoc Id : 384951]
HC (Kerala) 2009
J and S Granites Co. vs State of Kerala and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 375494]
HC (Kerala) 2009
Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. vs State of Arunachal Pradesh and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 364706]
HC (Gauhati) 2009
BOC India Ltd. and Tata Steel Ltd. vs State of Jharkhand and Ors [LexDoc Id : 358450]
SC 2009
Classic Spices (P) Ltd. vs State of Kerala [LexDoc Id : 405457]
HC (Kerala) 2009
Jindal Photo Ltd. vs Commissioner, Commercial Taxes Photographic machinery: Classification under Kerala VAT Act 2003-Machinery for photography included all equipment and machinery used to take photograph-A camera, though also photographic machinery, was not in common parlance described as photographic machinery, but was called camera as such. The machi [LexDoc Id : 373027]
HC (Kerala) 2009
Kenlott Gaming Solutions (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs State of Haryana and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 404705]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2009
State of Haryana and Ors. vs Haryana Organics and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 381168]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2009
Jai Jagannath Gases (P) Ltd. vs CTO and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 375607]
HC (Andhra Pradesh) 2009
Deepak Trading Co. vs State of Orissa and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 368033]
HC (Orissa) 2009
State of Kerala vs Molly Babu [LexDoc Id : 405959]
HC (Kerala) 2009
 
First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | Next | Last