| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 127 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
AAC, CTO vs Mahe Auto Fuel Enterprises and Bharat Petroleum Corpn. Ltd.
Payment of tax-Remittance-Whether, respondent/assessee, permitted to avail the facility of on-line generation of Form C declaration. Held, directions issued by writ Court that [LexDoc Id : 525686]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2018 |
State of Gujarat vs Hitarth Corpn.
[LexDoc Id : 525819]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2018 |
Sanden Vikas India (P) Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner
Rate of tax-Industrial input certificates-Whether, respondent can ignore rule 6 and take a stand that industrial input certificate produced is of no value. Held, considering the scheme of the [LexDoc Id : 525687]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2018 |
Sanden Vikas India (P) Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner (CT)
Input certificates-Rate of tax-Whether, correct rate of tax to be adopted in respect of the transactions effected by the petitioner is 4%. Held, goods imported by the petitioner are [LexDoc Id : 521819]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2018 |
Amit Metaliks Ltd. vs Joint Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Durgapur and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 521821]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2018 |
Scorpio Engg. (P) Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
[LexDoc Id : 521817]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2018 |
Scorpio Engg. (P) Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
[LexDoc Id : 521816]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2018 |
Kanaheyallal Patel vs Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
[LexDoc Id : 521815]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2018 |
Biesse Mfg. Co. (P) Ltd. vs State of Karnataka and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 521814]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2018 |
Maya Appliances (P) Ltd. vs Addl. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and Ors.
Taxable turnover-Net deductions-Whether, taxable turnover is turnover net deductions. Held, liability to pay tax is on taxable turnover. Taxable turnover is arrived at after making p [LexDoc Id : 521236]
|
SC |
2018 |
Jai Hind Ply vs Additional Commissioner (Commercial)
[LexDoc Id : 525682]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2018 |
Tvl. V.D.R. Impex vs Assistant Commissioner (CT), Vellore (South)
[LexDoc Id : 521820]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2018 |
State of Gujarat vs Meghmani Organics Ltd.
Reduction of Input tax credit-Section 2 (5) of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003. Capital goods-Whether, Tribunal was right in law in holding that Input Tax Credit @ 2% is not required to be reduced on "capital goods" used as "Inputs" in manufact [LexDoc Id : 529185]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2018 |
Pooja Marbles vs Assistant Commissioner (CT)
[LexDoc Id : 525825]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2018 |
Commissioner of Commercial Tax vs Neo Structo Construction Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 521164]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2018 |
Mukand Ltd. vs State of Karnataka
Input tax credit-Bogus transactions-Whether, respondent was justified in denying input tax credit benefits to assessee, on the ground that VAT-100 returns filed by selling dealers are no [LexDoc Id : 525684]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2018 |
K.U. Vipin vs CTO and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 520936]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2018 |
Samsung India Electronics (P) Ltd. vs Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
Single classification-Composite package-Whether Tribunal ought to have held that entire composite set having mobile phone and mobile charger having a single MRP was liable to assessed to a s [LexDoc Id : 520441]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2018 |
Parisons Foods (P) Ltd. vs Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
Tax rate-Entry third of Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003. Classification.-Appellant/dealer, engaged in the manufacture of 'bakery shortening'. Clarification sought for was tax rate applicable to 'bakery shortening', which ac [LexDoc Id : 520440]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2018 |
Kisankraft Machine Tools (P) Ltd. vs State of Karnataka and Ors.
Re-assessment order-Imposition of tax-Whether, petitioner rightly assailed impugned Re-assessment Order under Section 39(1)(a) for tax period imposing 5% VAT under provisions of the KVAT A [LexDoc Id : 520937]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2018 |
J.C. Industries vs State of Karnataka, Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
Input tax credit-Bogus dealer-Whether, petitioner was justified in allege that alleged breach of principles of natural justice in as much as adverse material was not confronted to [LexDoc Id : 520439]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2018 |
U WE Coats vs CTO and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 520938]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2018 |
Teleworld Mobiles (P) Ltd. vs Commissioner of Trade and Taxes
Imposition of Penalty-Violation of provision-Whether, in facts of the case respondents should be burdened with the penalty. Held, there is no provision in the Act under which authorities can be b [LexDoc Id : 520437]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Sukumar Barat and Ors. vs State of West Bengal and Ors.
Validity of order-Garnishee order-Petitioners question legality of amendments . Whether, complaint which was made by petitioners over issue of garnishee orders issued to two of their d [LexDoc Id : 520331]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2018 |
Uma Bricks Industries and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.
Use of Form C-Section 10A of the Central Sale Tax Act, 1956. Section 33 of the Tripura Value Added Tax Act, 2004. Payment of tax-Petitioner challenged the notice seeking explanation from the petitioner as to why a penalty @ 150% on the leviable tax on the value of the JCB machin [LexDoc Id : 520330]
|
HC (Tripura) |
2018 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next | Last |
| |
