Register free!

Banking - Judgement [ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950 1949 1948 1947 1946 1945 1944 1943 1942 1941 1940 1939 1938 1937 1936 1935 1934 1933 1932 1931 1930 1929 1928 1927 1926 1925 1924 1923 1922 1921 1920 1919 1918 1917 1915 1914 1902 1900 1896 Select Court HC SC Others   First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last Documents Found: 2418    Title Forum  Year CIT vs J.B. Exports Ltd. Profits derived from industrial undertaking-Duty drawback-AY 1991-92. The amount received by the assessee as duty drawback could not be allowed as deduction under s.80-I of the Income Tax Act 1961 since it wa [LexDoc Id : 290985] HC (Delhi) 2005 Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) (P) Ltd. vs UOI Duty evasion proceedings-Reasonable chance to defend-The show cause notices issued against the appellant after a period of 22 years were dismissed because the respondents were not providing the necessary [LexDoc Id : 288474] HC (Bombay) 2005 Kalyani Sales Co. and Anr. vs UOI and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 288364] SC 2005 Sanjeev Malhotra vs CIT Actual export-Evidence of actual export-AY 1998-99. In the absence of any evidence as to actual export of goods, no special deduction under s.80HHC Income Tax Act 1961 was allowable to the a [LexDoc Id : 287119] HC (Delhi) 2005 ITO vs Induflex Products (P) Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 285716] SC 2005 Hindustan Copper Ltd. and Anr. vs Banshi Lal and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 285504] SC 2005 CIT vs J.K. Synthetics Ltd. Rejection of accounts-Wastage in production-AY 1971-72. The Tribunal found that the percentage of wastage in production as shown was reasonable. The Tribunal was right in deleting the addition. [LexDoc Id : 332316] HC (Allahabad) 2005 CIT vs Rolcon Engg. Co. Ltd. Export development allowance-Computation, Loss from some units-AY 1986-87. The export development allowance could not be reduced by the amount of loss suffered by the assessee in some other units. S.80H [LexDoc Id : 297576] HC (Gujarat) 2005 DCIT vs K.R. Kalaimathi Penalty : Concealment of income-Surrender of non-genuine loan-AY 1996-97. The penalty under s.271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act 1961 was leviable on the assessee who had introduced certain loans in her accounts, wh [LexDoc Id : 292398] ITAT (Chennai) 2005 CIT vs Dhall Enterprises and Engineers (P) Ltd. Rate of depreciation: Gas cylinders-Cost of each asset-AY 1995-96. The assessee was entitled to claim 100 per cent depreciation on the cost of gas cylinders since the cost of each cylinder was less than Rs [LexDoc Id : 288689] HC (Gujarat) 2005 S. D. Singh vs Jharkhand High Court, through R.G. and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 287545] SC 2005 State of M.P. and Ors. vs Onkar Prasad Patel [LexDoc Id : 287541] SC 2005 CIT vs Bhullar Builders Depreciation allowance-Depreciation after estimation of income-AY 1994-95. The allowance of depreciation from the assessee’s income estimated by the AO by applying eight percent net profit rate was appropriate, as [LexDoc Id : 303112] HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2005 Rubey Pandey and Ors. vs United Bank of India Recovery of Debts-Re-call of ex parte order and condonation of delay-The ex parte order and the delay could not be condoned, as the plea was time-barred. The defendants were aware of the proceedings but chose to stay aw [LexDoc Id : 289351] DRAT 2005 Umrao Singh vs Punjabi University and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 287885] SC 2005 G.V. Films Ltd. vs S. Priyadarshan and Anr., TRO Bar of civil suit-Suit barring auction-purchaser to take possession-The suit praying for permanent injunction against auction purchaser to take possession was not maintainable. S.293 of the Income Tax Act 19 [LexDoc Id : 306712] HC (Chennai) 2005 Ranbaxy Fine Chemicals Ltd vs National Enterprises [LexDoc Id : 297789] HC (Delhi) 2005 State Bank of India vs Allied Chemical Laboratories and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 293746] SC 2005 CIT vs Mishrimal Soni Penalty: Concealment of income-Immunity from penalty, Value of seized promissory notes accepted as income-AY 1992-93. The assessee was a moneylender. During a search he admitted that the amounts mentioned in the seized promissory notes were his undisclosed [LexDoc Id : 316229] HC (Rajasthan) 2005 CIT vs Pankaj Jain [LexDoc Id : 286833] HC (Jammu and Kashmir) 2005 CIT and Anr. vs Chief Officer, State Bank of India Perquisite-Concessional rate for accommodation-AY 1991-92, 1992-93. The leased property allotted and the standard rent charged from the employees for each accommodation was not in the nature of a p [LexDoc Id : 301304] HC (Uttarakhand) 2005 Al-Haz Amir Hasan Properties (P) Ltd. vs ACIT Income from house property and business-Deduction against service charges-AY 2001-02. The assessee company derived its income from rent, interest and service charges. Since the service charges were being consistently assesse [LexDoc Id : 295631] ITAT (Calcutta) 2005 Parjanya Associates vs ACIT Penalty: Delay in filing audit report-Reasonable cause, Bona fide belief-AY 2001-02. The failure to furnish the audit report before the due date along with the return of income would not call for a penalty, as the assessee [LexDoc Id : 292575] ITAT (Ahmedabad) 2005 Chandan Sukhani vs CIT Unexplained investment-Purchase price incorrectly reflected in sale deed-AY 1996-97. The additions made to the assessee’s income due to unexplained investment could not be sustained since the sale deed had only reflected th [LexDoc Id : 292048] HC (Rajasthan) 2005 Samay Electronics (P) Ltd. vs DCIT Book profits-Provision for ascertained liability-AY 2001-02. The provisions made for repairs of the assessee’s damaged assets on the basis of loss determined by the District Industry Centre was an as [LexDoc Id : 289964] ITAT (Rajkot) 2005   First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last