Register free!

Banking - Judgement [ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950 1949 1948 1947 1946 1945 1944 1943 1942 1941 1940 1939 1938 1937 1936 1935 1934 1933 1932 1931 1930 1929 1928 1927 1926 1925 1924 1923 1922 1921 1920 1919 1918 1917 1915 1914 1902 1900 1896 Select Court HC SC Others   First | Prev | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | Last Documents Found: 2648    Title Forum  Year CIT vs Sohan Devi Sodani Validity of reassessment: Reasons to believe-Reopening on the basis of DVO’s report-AY 1993-94, 1996-97. The reopening of assessment on the basis of DVO’s report was invalid, as the report could not form for a reason to believe that t [LexDoc Id : 303925] HC (Rajasthan) 2006 DCIT vs Mahender Singh Accrual of income-Disputed interest on enhanced compensation-AY 1994-95, 1995-96. The assessee had received interest on enhanced compensation in addition to enhanced compensation on compulsory acquisition of his [LexDoc Id : 301830] ITAT (Delhi) 2006 CGT vs Rattan Chand Oswal and Ors. Deemed Gift-Difference in valuation of shares-AY 1974-75. The assessee had sold certain shares of a company at face value of Rs.100 each. The AO computed the capital gains accruing on sale by cons [LexDoc Id : 299349] HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2006 CWT vs Bansi Lal Agarwal Valuation of Residential house-Small portion used as office-AY 1975-76. The house property occupied by the assessee HUF as its residence and merely a small portion used for official purposes by a firm in which [LexDoc Id : 294188] HC (Allahabad) 2006 Techno Shares and Stocks Ltd. vs ITO Depreciation allowance-Stock exchange card-The stock exchange card of the Bombay Stock Exchange held by the assessee was a capital asset, which was entitled to depreciation. S.2(14) [LexDoc Id : 293895] ITAT (Mumbai) 2006 Bank of Baroda vs Bombay Burma Trading Co. and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 293741] DRAT 2006 UCO Bank vs Ushanil Mercantile (P) Ltd. and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 292489] DRT 2006 Gurudev Jeswani and Anr. vs Union Bank of India and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 292445] DRAT 2006 Status Sanitech (P) Ltd. vs ACIT Stay of demand of tax-Grant of installments-The assessee requested the CIT (Appeals) for stay of demand of Rs. 66 lakhs pending appeal. It is not clear whether the position of cash in hand and i [LexDoc Id : 329927] HC (Allahabad) 2006 I.B.P.Company Ltd. and Ors., Amarnath Singh vs Ramashish Prasad Singh and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 305114] HC (Patna) 2006 CIT vs Swastik Udyog (P) Ltd. Appeal to the High Court-Valuation of cost of construction-AY 1991-92, 1992-93. No substantial question of law arose from the tribunal’s order, which had deleted the addition made to the assessee’s income on t [LexDoc Id : 303422] HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2006 CIT vs Narayan Glass Works Investment allowance-Erection of new furnace-AY 1978-79. The assessee was entitled to investment allowance in respect of the expenditure incurred on building a new furnace, which was built after [LexDoc Id : 296119] HC (Allahabad) 2006 CIT vs Vasu Farms (P) Ltd. Business expenditure-Feed and medicine for birds-AY 1992-93. The expenses incurred by the assessee, a poultry farm owner, by way of feed and medicines given to birds during the pre-layer stage were a [LexDoc Id : 296115] HC (Chennai) 2006 CIT vs Amritsar Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. Validity of Assessment-Revised return filed after assessment-AY 1974-75. The specific finding of the Tribunal that the AO should have considered the revised return filed by the assessee while making fresh assess [LexDoc Id : 295387] HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2006 Radhakrishna Joshi vs Syndicate Bank Recovery from deceased borrower-Undertaking by Father to repay-An undertaking given by a father to repay loan taken by deceased son and the acknowlegement of liability confirmed by the fact that some payments had [LexDoc Id : 293704] HC (Karnataka) 2006 CIT vs Best and Crompton Engg. Ltd. Double Taxation Relief-Double taxed income-AY 1981-82. The assessee was entitled to relief from double taxation under s.91 of the Income Tax Act 1961 in respect of income earned and taxed in Ir [LexDoc Id : 290979] HC (Chennai) 2006 K.R.M. Marine Exports Ltd. vs ACIT Profits of business-Processing and freezing charges received from other exporters-The processing and freezing charges received by the assessee exporter were its business profits, which were eligible for deduction under s.80HHC of th [LexDoc Id : 290977] HC (Chennai) 2006 State of Rajasthan and Anr. vs Mohammed Ayub Naz [LexDoc Id : 287603] SC 2006 State of Karnataka and Ors. vs KGSD Canteen Employees Welfare Association and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 286659] SC 2006 Sarat Chandra Mishra and Ors. vs State of Orissa and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 286658] SC 2006 Amritha Cyber Park (P) Ltd. vs Kerala Financial Corpn. Recovery of dues by State Financial Corporations-Revenue recovery proceedings-A petition challenging the revenue recovery proceedings initiated under s.69(2) of the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act 1968 was dismissed as it was devoid [LexDoc Id : 302755] HC (Kerala) 2006 CIT vs Sanco Trans Ltd. Business expenditure vs Capital expenditure-Expenses on leased premises-AY 1984-85. The expenses incurred by the assessee company for renovation or repairs of its leased premises were allowable as business expenditure, sin [LexDoc Id : 292496] HC (Chennai) 2006 S.P. Goyal vs DIT (Investigation) Government of India [LexDoc Id : 288480] HC (Delhi) 2006   First | Prev | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | Last