| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 2802 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Wood Veneers vs Assistant Commissioner (Assessment) and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 367948]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2007 |
CIT vs Gulati Industrial Fabrication (P) Ltd.
Validity of re-assessment-Alleged: Accommodation entries-The assessment made was re-opened on the basis of the statement of one Mr. Sanjay Rastogi to the effect that the assessee had taken an accommodation e [LexDoc Id : 345807]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2007 |
Hafiz Mohammed vs ACIT
Unexplained investment-Investment made by son-AY 1989-90 and AY 1990-91.The son of the assessee had purchased a plot in auction, which he later sold. The capital gains were assessed in his hands. [LexDoc Id : 335823]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2007 |
CIT vs Hindustan Zinc Ltd.
Business expenditure-Alteration of technology of new unit, Academic question-The question had become academic therefore, it was not to be answered.
S.268 and s.37 (1) of the Income Tax Act 1961
[LexDoc Id : 335394]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2007 |
CIT vs Delhi Public School
Value of perk-Free education to employees children-AY 2003-04. The assessee was running a school. It provided free education to children of its staff. For valuation of perk the cost of education in a s [LexDoc Id : 334298]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2007 |
DCIT vs Flex Engineering Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 331561]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2007 |
S. Anthony vs Registrar, Tamil Nadu Taxation Special Tribunal and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 368773]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2007 |
CIT vs Rabindranath Lal
Relief for arrears of salary-Amounts received under VRS-AY 2001-02. The relief under s.89 was available for amounts received under VRS in excess of exemption limit under s.10(10C).
S.89 of the Inc [LexDoc Id : 353053]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2007 |
C.P. Jacob vs ACIT
Accrual of capital gains-Receipt of enhanced compensation-AY 1995-96. Assessee's property was compulsorily acquired in 1984. Order for enhanced compensation was passed on 25 January 1994. State disputed the s [LexDoc Id : 350803]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2007 |
Manju Shikdar vs State Bank of Indore and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 350065]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2007 |
ACIT vs D and H Secheron Electrodes (P) Ltd.
Valuation of closing stock-Excise Duty not paid on stock-in-hand-The assessee had not paid excise duty on goods held as stock-in-hand since the goods had not left its premises. The amount of excise duty could not be [LexDoc Id : 348928]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2007 |
Misuki Exports (P) Ltd. vs State Bank of India and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 340569]
|
DRAT |
2007 |
CIT vs Hindustan Zinc Ltd.
Income deemed to accrue in India-Irreconcilable findings by Tribunal-The findings of fact recorded by Tribunal in two different paragraphs were contrary to each other. The matter remanded to the Tribunal for a fresh dec [LexDoc Id : 335393]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2007 |
DCIT vs SIAL SBEC Bioenergy Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 333565]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2007 |
CIT vs Pioneer Asia Packing (P) Ltd.
Carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation-Law applicable: Effect of amendment of s.32(2), Set off of capital gains against unabsorbed depreciation-AY 2000-01. The effect of amendment to s.32(2) w.e.f. 1 April 1997 was that deeming fiction of treating earlier years unabsorbed depreciation was remo [LexDoc Id : 331132]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2007 |
CIT vs Shakthi Knitting Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 331026]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2007 |
CIT vs Kwality Restaurant and Ice Cream Co.
[LexDoc Id : 329557]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2007 |
CIT vs Jayendrakumar Hiralal
Business expenditure-Contribution for treatment of effluents-The contribution made for common treatment of effluents plant was business expenditure.
S.37(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961 [LexDoc Id : 395786]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2007 |
DCIT vs Aims Industires Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 342990]
|
ITAT (Ahmedabad) |
2007 |
Darshana Aggarwal vs TRO and Ors.
Sale and attachment of immovable property-Powers of Tax Recovery Officer(TRO): Finding of benami-The TRO had no power to hold whether property attached was held as “benami” for the defaulter assessee. This fact could be established by the Departme [LexDoc Id : 338439]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2007 |
CIT vs S. K. Srigiri and Bros.
Salary paid to partner-Deduction of salary on addition to business income-AY 1994-95, AY 1995-96 and AY 1996-97. After survey under s.133A, the assessee declared certain additional income. The Tribunal found that the said ad [LexDoc Id : 334831]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2007 |
Mico Ball Bearing (India) Ltd. vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 333653]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2007 |
A J Shetty and Company (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 333155]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2007 |
CIT vs Prem Kumar
Accrual of: Capital gains- Date of award-Compulsory acquisition of land-AY 1984-85. The land of the assessee was compulsorily acquired and possession of land was taken on 23 December 1984. A small part of the compensation [LexDoc Id : 330638]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2007 |
Hero Exports vs CIT
Computation of deduction: Export of goods-Income from exports and income from: Export incentives, commission, interest, etc., Indirect cost-AY 1994-95 to AY 1997-98. The assessee was exporting trading goods. It was entitled to deduction under s.80HHC(3)(b). The assessee was entitled to exc [LexDoc Id : 329363]
|
SC |
2007 |
| |
| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| |
