| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 2802 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
ACIT vs Triace
[LexDoc Id : 334630]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2007 |
Ashok Leyland Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 331328]
|
ITAT (Chennai) |
2007 |
CIT vs Sharwan Kumar
[LexDoc Id : 331027]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2007 |
CIT vs J.K. Synthetics Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 330203]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2007 |
Honda Siel Power Products Ltd. vs CIT
Rectification of mistake: Rule of precedence-Failure to consider decision of the co-ordinate bench-AY 1991-92. The Tribunal had not considered the decision of a co-ordinate bench cited before it. It was mistake apparent from record since the rule of [LexDoc Id : 329555]
|
SC |
2007 |
M.V. Amarashetty vs Chief CIT and Anr. (No. 1)
Waiver of interest-Non-Co-operation by assessee-AY 1992-93, AY 1994-95 and AY 1995-96. There was delay in payment of tax. The waiver application moved under s.220(2A) was rightly rejected on account [LexDoc Id : 358726]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2007 |
N.P. Santhosh Kumar vs ACIT
Validity of: Revision by CIT-AO taking a possible view-Block period: 1 April 1996 to 27 March 2003. The assessee was running a hotel. The assesee admitted undisclosed sale from sale of soda. The AO estimat [LexDoc Id : 351333]
|
ITAT (Cochin) |
2007 |
CIT vs A. Rajendra Prasad
Maintainability of appeals by department-Low tax effect-Where the tax-effect was low as per CBDT's (Central Board of Direct Tax) circular the department in its appeal must mention the exceptions applicable [LexDoc Id : 347765]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2007 |
CIT vs A. Raajendra Prasad
Maintainability of appeals by department-Low tax effect-The instructions of the CBDT issued under s.119 for not filing appeals to Tribunal or High Court or Supreme Court where tax effect was low were mandat [LexDoc Id : 337970]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2007 |
DCIT vs Lyka Labs Ltd.
Method of accounts-Law applicable-After amendment of s.145 w.e.f. 1 April 1997, the assessee could follow either cash system or merchantile system of accounts. The assessee could not [LexDoc Id : 337220]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2007 |
ACIT vs Rasna Industries
Block assessment-Levy of surcharge: Law applicable-The search was conducted on 29 July 1999 i.e. before 1 June 2002. No surcharge was leviable on tax.
S.113 of the Income Tax Act 1961 [LexDoc Id : 335995]
|
ITAT (Jodhpur) |
2007 |
A B Mauria India (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 335217]
|
ITAT (Chennai) |
2007 |
Siel Ltd. vs DCIT
Amalgamation-Carry forward and set off of unabsorbed depreciation of amalgamated company-The company India Hard Metals Ltd. was amalgamated with the assessee company. The unabsorbed depreciation of India Hard Metals Ltd. for AY 1994-95 was [LexDoc Id : 335159]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2007 |
ITO vs Jaswinder Kaur
[LexDoc Id : 334068]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2007 |
CIT vs Manohar Lal Soni (Dead) through L.Rs
Computation of: undisclosed income-Income of the year below taxable limit-Block-period: AY 1988-89 to AY 1999-2000. While computing income of the block-period, the income of any year which was below taxable income is not to [LexDoc Id : 334003]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2007 |
ITO vs D.K. Singhal
[LexDoc Id : 333879]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2007 |
Vineet Jain vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 333810]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2007 |
Powerplant Performance Improvement Ltd. vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 333747]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2007 |
Sain Processing and Weaving Mills vs ACIT
Carry forward and set-off of unabsorbed depreciation-Set-off against any head of income: Law applicable-AY 1999-2000. The assessee had unabsorbed depreciation brought forward from AY 1991-92 and AY 1992-93. The amended provisions of s.32(2) as effective [LexDoc Id : 333587]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2007 |
CIT vs V K Ferro Alloys Industries
[LexDoc Id : 332713]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2007 |
CIT vs V.K. Ferro Alloys Industries (P) Ltd.
Extension of limitation-Directions by CIT (Appeals)-The assessee case was transferred under s.127 from AO Company circle to ACIT (investigation). The said order under s.127 was quashed by the High Court [LexDoc Id : 331959]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2007 |
ACIT vs Kapil Dev
[LexDoc Id : 331129]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2007 |
British Airways PLC vs Dy Director of Income Tax Circle
Penalty: Concealment of income-No satisfaction recorded-AY 1996-97 to AY 2001-02. In the assessment order the AO had not given any reasons as to why in his opinion it was just to initiate penalty proceeding [LexDoc Id : 330804]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2007 |
Travel Pals (India) (P) Ltd. vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 330730]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2007 |
P.M. Alavi vs STO and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 368738]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2007 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
