Register free! 
Banking - Judgement
[ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  

 
First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 3280   
Title Forum  Year
CIT vs N. Nagaraj Ballal [LexDoc Id : 384787]
HC (Karnataka) 2009
CIT vs India Pistons Ltd. Valuation of closing stock-Excise and Customs duty payable-AY 1992-93. The assessee had imported certain material which was not yet cleared and was kept in bonded warehouse. The manufactured goods were not cle [LexDoc Id : 384581]
HC (Chennai) 2009
Tricom India Ltd. vs ACIT Export of software: Income derived from export-Interest on FDRs-AY 2005-06. The assessee provided I.T. enabled services and BPO services. The interest earned on FDRs and misc income was not entitled to deduction u [LexDoc Id : 381462]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2009
CIT, ITO and Anr. vs Sri Hariram Hotels (P) Ltd. Computation of: capital gains-Cost of acquisition-Interest on borrowed capital-AY 2003-2004. The interest on capital borrowed for purchase of property was part of the cost of acquisition to compute the capital gains.
S.48 of [LexDoc Id : 381458]
HC (Karnataka) 2009
CIT vs Thiruvengadam Investments (P) Ltd. Scope of fiction under s.50C-The value taken for computation of capital gains-AY 2004-05. The fiction under s.50C that value adopted for stamp duty would be taken as consideration received could not be extended to business asset [LexDoc Id : 380554]
HC (Chennai) 2009
Children's Education Society vs DCIT and Anr. TDS: Failure to make TDS-Deductee paid the tax-AY 1994-95 to 1997-98. The assessee had failed to make TDS. The deductees had paid the tax. Therefore, the same could not be recovered from it.
[LexDoc Id : 380494]
HC (Karnataka) 2009
CIT and ACIT vs Udupi Builders (P) Ltd. Capital investment-Subsidy to encourage hotel industry in state-AY 1994-95. The subsidy paid by the State to encourage hotel industry in the state was a capital receipt even if received after completion of the proj [LexDoc Id : 379791]
HC (Karnataka) 2009
Punjab Financial Corpn. vs Surya Auto Industries [LexDoc Id : 379497]
SC 2009
Children's Education Society vs DCIT [LexDoc Id : 379271]
HC (Karnataka) 2009
Ketan Construction Ltd. vs UOI [LexDoc Id : 378664]
HC (Gujarat) 2009
CIT vs EID Parry India Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 378128]
HC (Chennai) 2009
CIT vs E.I.D. Parry India Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 378029]
HC (Chennai) 2009
Shobha Gangaram Guhe vs Deputy Director of Education and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 377466]
HC (Bombay) 2009
Ramesh Namdeorao Khedkar vs Shriram Shikshan Sanstha and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 377464]
HC (Bombay) 2009
Hind Syntex Ltd. vs CIT Validity of re-asstt.-Recomputation of: Depreciation- Full facts disclosed-AY 1988-1989. The assessee had fully disclosed the fact that it changed the method of depreciation in view of Amendment of Companies Act. The notice u [LexDoc Id : 404052]
HC (Madhya Pradesh) 2009
P. and G. Hygiene and Health Care Ltd. vs Commissioner of Commercial Tax Limitation for filing appeal: Date of knowledge-Appeal filed within 90 days in order, Preliminary objection as to maintainability of appeal overruled-In the matter of reckoning the period of limitation prescribed in s.62 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act 2003, the period of 90 days was to be reckone [LexDoc Id : 402156]
HC (Kerala) 2009
Proctor and Gamble Hygiene and Health Care Ltd. vs Commissioner of Commercial Tax [LexDoc Id : 401333]
HC (Kerala) 2009
Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. vs State of Kerala and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 395126]
HC (Kerala) 2009
Travellers Choice vs ITO Validity of: Re-asstt.-Reasons recorded not adequate to reach satisfaction-AY 1991-1992, 1992-1993 and 1993-1994. The AO recorded the following for issuing notice under s.148. I have reasons to believe that the income chargea [LexDoc Id : 394969]
HC (Karnataka) 2009
CIT and Anr. vs S.N. Murali Mohan Unaccounted cash and valuable found in search-Manipulation of accounts-AY 1991-1992. During the search under s.132, certain unaccounted cash, diamonds and other valuables were seized along with some loose-slips. The AO co [LexDoc Id : 392797]
HC (Karnataka) 2009
Kohinoor Cloth Stores vs ACIT [LexDoc Id : 392362]
ITAT (Pune) 2009
H. Gouthamchand vs Addl. CIT [LexDoc Id : 392279]
ITAT (Bangalore) 2009
CIT vs Khemchand and Motilal Jain Tobacco Products (P) Ltd. Business expenditure-Commission paid to Directors, Royalty: Use of Trademark-Ay-1992-1993. 1. The assessee paid commission to it’s Director for giving personal guarantees for loans. The commission paid was found reasonable by [LexDoc Id : 391255]
HC (Madhya Pradesh) 2009
Prem Nath Nagpal vs ACIT [LexDoc Id : 384773]
ITAT (Delhi) 2009
All India Punjab National Bank Officers' Association and Ors. vs Punjab National Bank and Ors. Perk - Loan at concessional rate-Computation of perk-value-AY 2008-2009. The difference between the SBI rate and the rate at which the employer grants loan is the concession. Rule 3(7) provides a benchmark for [LexDoc Id : 384743]
HC (Madhya Pradesh) 2009
 
First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last