| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 3280 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
CIT vs Prasar Bharti
Commission-Charges retained by advertising agent-The Door Darshan (DD) was the telecasting agency. The relationship with its advertising agents was that of principal and agent. The 15% of the charges [LexDoc Id : 385867]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2009 |
National Co-op. Development Corpn. vs ACIT
Income from long-tem finance-Income by way of dividend, Interest on short term deposits, Service charges for loans-AY 1999-2000 and 2004-05.
The income dividend and interest on short term deposits was not income derived from long-term deposits. Even if it was i [LexDoc Id : 385301]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2009 |
ACIT vs Chetan Das Lachman Das
Rejection of accounts-Allegation of charging additional rates-An addition to income was made on the allegation that assessee charged rate higher than the billed rate. No enquiry made from customers. There was no [LexDoc Id : 385299]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2009 |
DCIT vs Standard Fire Works (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 384771]
|
ITAT (Chennai) |
2009 |
CIT vs Lal Singh and Ors.
Capital asset-Agricultural land-Distance from municipal limits-AY 1995-1996. The assessee's agricultural land was situated beyond 8 kms from municipal limits as per report of the Tehsildar. The report of income ta [LexDoc Id : 384770]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2009 |
Bhikhabhai Dhanjibhai Patel vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 384625]
|
ITAT (Ahmedabad) |
2009 |
ITO vs Manjit Singh and Amarjit Singh
[LexDoc Id : 384200]
|
ITAT (Chandigarh) |
2009 |
Subrata Kumar Nag vs CIT
[LexDoc Id : 384160]
|
ITAT (Calcutta) |
2009 |
ITO vs Usha Aggarwal
Unexplained: Cash Credits-Gifts from strangers-AY 2002-2003. The assessee claimed to have received certain amounts as gifts. The donors had made gifts which were quite high compared to their income [LexDoc Id : 380485]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2009 |
DDIT vs Sutron Corpn.
[LexDoc Id : 379916]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2009 |
ACIT vs T.R. Srinivasan
Cost of acquisition-Assets received on liquidation of company-AY 1991-92.
The assessee had purchased shares of ‘JPL’ in 1989. On liquidation of ‘JPL’ he received immovable property in proportion to his sharehold [LexDoc Id : 378977]
|
ITAT (Chennai) |
2009 |
Sumitomo Mitsui Construction Co. Ltd. vs DIT
Sumitomo Mitsui Construction Co. Ltd., In re
Income deemed to accrue in India-Rate of tax-AY 2008-09. The royalty received by a Japanese non-residing company was taxable at 10 per cent from AY 2008-09 under Article 12(2) r.w.s. Protocol dat [LexDoc Id : 376766]
|
AAR |
2009 |
Jodhpur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. vs CIT
Jodhpur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd., In re
Business expenses-Prior period expense-The prior period expenses for which the liability crystallized during the year were deductible during the year.
S.37(1) of the Income Tax Ac [LexDoc Id : 376716]
|
AAR |
2009 |
James Jeyachandran vs Tamil Nadu State Transport Corpn. Ltd. and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 411042]
|
HC (Madras) |
2009 |
Lingam and Sons vs State of Tamil Nadu
[LexDoc Id : 405947]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2009 |
CIT vs Dabur India Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 398889]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2009 |
CIT vs Arisudana Spinning Mills Ltd.
Penalty: Concealment of income-Disallowance of debatable claim-AY 1997-1998, 1998-1999 and 2000-2001. When return was filed the issue of claim of deduction under s.80-IA was a debatable issue. The law was later se [LexDoc Id : 397758]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2009 |
Jai Bharat Gum and Chemicals Ltd. vs Addl. CIT
Income derived from industrial unit-Duty drawback and DEPB credits-AY 2006-2007. The duty drawback and profits on DEPB were not entitled to deduction under s.80-IB, not being income derived from industrial undertaking [LexDoc Id : 394960]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2009 |
ACIT vs Sher Singh
[LexDoc Id : 391001]
|
ITAT (Chandigarh) |
2009 |
Mawana Sugars Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 379170]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2009 |
Ajabrao Tulsiramji Patinge vs Shri Samarth Institution of Education, Karuna Ramdas Nagrale and Education Officer
[LexDoc Id : 376927]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Mepco Industries Ltd. vs CIT and Anr.
Rectification of mistake-Effect of later Supreme Courts Judgment-AY 1993-94 and 1994-95.
Originally the CIT hud that power subsidy received was a capital receipt vide his order passed on 30 April 1997. The said ord [LexDoc Id : 376899]
|
SC |
2009 |
Rajnikant Vallabhdas Vokhariya vs Tushar Vijayrao Kulkarni and Aushotosh Vijayrao Kulkarni
[LexDoc Id : 376740]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Sahebrao Sadhuji Tembhare vs Navyuvak Shikshan Sanstha Ekodi, Headmaster, Ramaji Kapgate Vidyalaya and Education Officer
[LexDoc Id : 376739]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Tamil Nadu Computer Science, B.Ed. Graduate Teachers Welfare Society vs Higher Secondary School Computer Teachers Association and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 376529]
|
SC |
2009 |
| |
| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| |
