| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 3280 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
ACIT vs Excellent Land Developers (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 378584]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2009 |
Jayaben Visanji Maru Foundation vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 409962]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2009 |
DCIT vs Rano Singh
[LexDoc Id : 405198]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2009 |
Radha Picture Palace vs DCIT
Disallowance of: salary, interest paid to partner-Return not filed - Best judgment assessment-A.Y. 1995-96.
The assessee was a firm. It did not file the return u/s 139. A belated return was filed on 31.12.1999. Then a notice u/s 148 was is [LexDoc Id : 403871]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2009 |
CIT vs Deep Baruah
Limitation-For Re-asstt.-Law applicable-Effect of Amendment to S.143-AY 1999-2000 and 2000-2001. The return was filed on 24-01-2003, under s.148. The assessee was given opportunity of being heard, but no notice under s. [LexDoc Id : 401293]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2009 |
Lakkavauula S.S.S. Prasad vs Oriental Bank of Commerce and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 394473]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2009 |
Mavis Satcom Ltd. vs DCIT
Writ and re-assessments-Assessee participating in proceedings-AY 2003-2004 and 2004-2005. On receipt of notice under s.148, the assessee appeared before the AO and sought time for filing explanation. In the meanw [LexDoc Id : 392793]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2009 |
H.E. Distilleries (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 385161]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2009 |
Pradip Kr. Taye and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.
Exemption: Income of member of Scheduled tribe of specified area-Migration from one specified area to another specified area-AY 2005-06. The exemption under s.10(26) would not be lost if member of a scheduled tribe of specified area migrates to another specified area.
LexDoc Id : 385158]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2009 |
Devaki Multifilms (P) Ltd. vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 383402]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2009 |
State of Tamil Nadu vs Uptron India Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 380573]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2009 |
CIT and DCIT vs Motor Industries Co. Ltd.
Total turnover-Sale of scrap in domestic market-The sale of scrap in local market was includible in total turnover. Expln. (ba) S. 80HHC of the Income Tax Act 1961.
[Editorial Note: The [LexDoc Id : 380124]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2009 |
Carol Info Services Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 379719]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2009 |
ACIT vs Akasha Syncotex Ltd.
Akasha Syncotex Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 378583]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2009 |
S. Puttaswamy vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 377968]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2009 |
ACIT vs Anchor Health and Beautycare (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 377956]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2009 |
CIT vs Alpha Clays
[LexDoc Id : 403836]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2009 |
Barbar Ship Management India (P) Ltd. vs ITO
Interest on: Default in payment of advance tax-Computation of Interest: ast Asstt. under s.147, Date of charging interest-AY 1998-1999. After issue of intimation under s.143(1) on 10-08-1999 asstt. was made under s.147 on 25-02-2005. The intimation under s.143(1) was not [LexDoc Id : 396210]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2009 |
CIT vs Ryots Agricultural Produce Co-op. Marketing Society Ltd.
Income from marketing agricultural produce of members-Hiring lorries to transport agricultural produce, ‘Marketing’-Ay-1998-1999. The assessee a co-op. society was marketing agricultural produce of it’s members. The income from hiring lorries for transporting the pr [LexDoc Id : 392110]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2009 |
CIT and Anr. vs K. Lakshmansa and Co.
Interest payable to assessee-Refund consequent to order of Settlement Commission-AY 1994-95.
The assessee was granted refund since its application for waiver of interest charged under s.234A, under s.234B and under s.234C was acce [LexDoc Id : 384710]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2009 |
DCIT vs Angel Broking Ltd.
TDS: Fees for Technical Services-VSAT charges etc. -AY 2005-06.
The assessee, a share-broker, was member of Stock-exchanges. The payment made to Stock-Exchangers as VSAT, BOLT, Demat and leased line ch [LexDoc Id : 382790]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2009 |
CIT vs Shiv Ram Veg Food Industries
[LexDoc Id : 381339]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2009 |
CIT vs Baghat Urban Co-op. Bank Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 379638]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2009 |
Besix Kier Dabhol SA vs ADIT
[LexDoc Id : 379445]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2009 |
CIT vs Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd.
Limitation for order u/s 201(1A)-Order passed beyond 4 years-A.Y. 1992-93, 93-94.
The order passed u/s 201 beyond 4 years was time barred.
S. 201 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. [LexDoc Id : 379389]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2009 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
