| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 3826 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
CIT vs K.R.B.L. Ltd.
Profits of business-DEPB credits utilized by assessee itself-Since the credits in DEPB were used by assessee and were not sold or transferred S. 28(iiid) would not apply. Accordingly, Proviso 2, 3 and 4 to S. 80 [LexDoc Id : 440757]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2012 |
Mohan Lal Saraf vs DRAT and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 438550]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2012 |
DDIT vs Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corpn.
[LexDoc Id : 437889]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
Tata Communications Ltd. vs JCIT
DCIT vs Tata Communications Ltd.
Depreciation allowance-Part ownership of asset-After 1.4.97, the depreciation could be claimed on an asset party owned by assessee.
S. 32(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. [LexDoc Id : 437613]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
Instant Holdings Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 437362]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
Leela Lace Software Solution (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 436469]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
Joshi (P) Mathew vs DCIT and CIT
[LexDoc Id : 435561]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2012 |
Kadakkal Educational Trust vs CIT
[LexDoc Id : 435386]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2012 |
CIT vs Ganapati Finance Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 435168]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2012 |
Pratibha Finvest (P) Ltd. vs ITO
Scope of: Re-assessment-Additions not covered by reasons recorded-A.Y. 2001-02.
A valid notice u/s 148 was issued. The final re-assessment was not restricted to the reasons recorded u/s 148(2) at time of issue o [LexDoc Id : 435117]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2012 |
CIT vs KRBL Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 435114]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2012 |
CIT vs Everest Advertising (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 477614]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2012 |
R.C. Goel vs CIT
Business disallowance - payments in cash-Payer insisting on cash payment-A.Y. 2008-09.
The assessee was in catering contract for Railways, for 2 trains. Small articles of daily use were sourced from one SE which was a [LexDoc Id : 444202]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2012 |
Aartech Solonics Ltd. vs CIT
Manufacture-Production of: Advanced micro-processor-A.Y. 2006-2007.
The assessee was manufacturing advanced micro-processor. Whether it involved manufacture or not could he decided by taking an exp [LexDoc Id : 441014]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2012 |
Thankaraj vs G.I.C. Housing Finance Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 440879]
|
DRAT (Chennai) |
2012 |
Meinhardt Singapore Pte Ltd. vs ADIT
Validity of: Re-asstt.-Failure to file relevant document-A.Y. 2002-2003, 2003-2004.
The assessee had not field a relevant agreement. This was concealing a relevant fact. The re-opening was valid.
[ [LexDoc Id : 438330]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2012 |
CIT and Anr. vs Golf View Homes Ltd.
Scope of appeal to High Court-Amendment of Memo of appeal vis-à-vis. Non filing of appeal-A.Y. 1999-2000, 2000-01.
The Tribunal had passed a common order in two appeal viz No. 3125 of 2004 and No. 939 of 2003. The Department filed appe [LexDoc Id : 437670]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2012 |
NDT Systems, Sewalal D. Tiwari and Ashok Kumar Gupta vs ITO, CIT and UOI
Validity of notice under s.148-Reasons recorded at time of issue of notice-A.Y. 2007-2008. The validity of a notice issued under s.148 is to be tested on the basis of reasons recorded before issuing notice. These reasons reco [LexDoc Id : 435438]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2012 |
R.C. Goel vs CIT
[LexDoc Id : 435171]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2012 |
CIT vs Lakshmi Sugar Mills Co. Ltd.
Validity of: Closing stock-Unpaid excise duty-A.Y. 2005-06.
The goods were removed. The Excise Duty was not paid yet it had become payable. In view of S. 145A, the unpaid duty was to be inclu [LexDoc Id : 446135]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2012 |
UCO Bank vs Presiding Officer, Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 440215]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2012 |
Chief CIT vs Gujarat Mitra (P) Ltd.
Levy of interest and credit for MAT-Law applicable-A.Y. 1999-2000.
The credit for MAT was to be taken into consideration before computing interest u/s 234B.
Ss. 115 JAA, 234B of the Income Ta [LexDoc Id : 437671]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2012 |
Ashwinbhai B. Pokiya vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 436716]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2012 |
Shebin Jewellery vs Chief CIT and ITO
[LexDoc Id : 436337]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2012 |
CIT vs Fairdeal Construction Co.
[LexDoc Id : 435729]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2012 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
