Register free! 
Banking - Judgement
[ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  

 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 3826   
Title Forum  Year
Ranjeetsinh Jagdishsinh Thakur vs P.S. Industrial Engineers Ltd. and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 439877]
HC (Gujarat) 2012
Abdul Kadir and Anr. vs Central Assam Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 439872]
HC (Gauhati) 2012
Rollatainers Ltd. vs DCIT Validity of: Re-assessment-No failure to disclose material particulars-A.Y. 2003-04.
There was no failure of the assessee to disclose material facts in original assessment on the issue on which notice u/s 148 was iss [LexDoc Id : 436336]
HC (Delhi) 2012
CIT vs Ultra Modern Exports (P) Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 435440]
HC (Delhi) 2012
CIT and Anr. vs Vishan Naraiyan Khanna [LexDoc Id : 435218]
HC (Uttarakhand) 2012
Sanjeev Kumar Samrat vs National Insurance Co. Ltd. and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 434889]
SC 2012
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. vs Hindustan National Glass and Ind. Ltd. and Ors.

Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Anr. vs ICICI Bank Ltd. and Ors.

Finolex Industries Ltd. and Anr. vs RBI and Ors.
Master Circular on Wilful Defaulters dated 01 July 2008: Purpose of Circular to cover wilful defaults of dues by a borrower to bank and also by a client of bank under other banking transactions-Interpretation of definition of ‘wilful default’ in Circular, RBI empowered to call for information relating to defaulting party-The purpose of the Master Circular on Wilful Defaulters dated 01 July 2008, being to caution banks and financial institutions from giving any further [LexDoc Id : 434885]
SC 2012
Girish Chandra Gupta vs Uttar Pradesh Industrial Development Corpn. Ltd. and Ors.

James Kutty P.C. and Anr. vs Tread Stone Ltd. and Ors.
Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act 1969-Powers vested in MRTP Commission under s.12B independent of its powers under s.10 and s.36B-The powers vested in the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission under s.12B(3) of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act 19 [LexDoc Id : 434883]
SC 2012
ITO vs Keval Construction Income 'derived from' housing project-Special deduction vis-à-vis - Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia)-The amount disallowed u/s 40(a)(ia) would be entitled for special deduction u/s 80-IB.
S. 80-IB(10) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. [LexDoc Id : 445309]
HC (Gujarat) 2012
Delhi Transport Corpn. vs Mahinder Singh [LexDoc Id : 442683]
HC (Delhi) 2012
Hindustan Unilever Ltd. @ Hindustan Lever Ltd. vs Addl. CIT [LexDoc Id : 442011]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2012
CIT vs Metallurgical Engg. Consultants India Ltd. Duty of Tribunal-Passing a speaking order-The Tribunal reversed the order of CIT(A) without giving reason as to where the CIT(A) had gone wrong. It was not a speaking order.
Case remanded [LexDoc Id : 437672]
HC (Jharkhand) 2012
CIT vs Metallurgical Engg. Consultants India Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 435565]
HC (Jharkhand) 2012
CIT and Anr. vs Great City Mfg. Co. Remuneration to partners as per S. 40(b)-Reasonableness of Remuneration-A.Y. 2005-2006.
The salary to partners were paid as per statutory provision u/s 40(b)(v). No part of it could he disallowed u/s 40A(2) on ground [LexDoc Id : 435558]
HC (Allahabad) 2012
CIT vs Kutchi Dasa Oswal Moto Pariwar Ambama Trust Registration of charitable trust-Activities not commenced-The registration under s.12AA cannot be denied on the only ground that no activities had commenced.

S.12AA. of the Income Tax Act 1961

LexDoc Id : 435437]
HC (Gujarat) 2012
Rajan Nanda vs ACIT [LexDoc Id : 435367]
HC (Delhi) 2012
ITO vs Mittal Investment and Co. [LexDoc Id : 479727]
ITAT (Delhi) 2012
Arup Kumar Chakraborty vs UOI and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 447677]
HC (Gauhati) 2012
Jag Dev vs D.T.C. and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 444709]
HC (Delhi) 2012
Travel Agents Association of India vs Lufthansa German Airlines [LexDoc Id : 440626]
CAT (Delhi) 2012
ACIT vs Serco Bpo (P) Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 440028]
ITAT (Delhi) 2012
ATS Infrastructure Ltd. vs ACIT and Ors. Limitation for Fresh-assessment-Fresh asstt on Court's order-The High Court had given the liberty to the A.O. to pass a fresh order. The fresh order could not be challenged on ground of limitation.
S. 153(3 [LexDoc Id : 438654]
HC (Allahabad) 2012
Smith and Sharks Projects India (P) Ltd. vs ITO

ITO vs Smith and Sharks Projects India (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 438182]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2012
Wills Processing Services India (P) Ltd. vs DCIT [LexDoc Id : 437209]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2012
ITO vs Sab Miller India Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 436970]
ITAT (Delhi) 2012
 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last