| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 6202 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Debabrata Shee and Ors. Govt. of Assam and Ors.
Assam Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules 1964: Penalty of dismissal-Disciplinary inquiry initiated and conducted in total derogation of procedure laid down in rule 9, Penalty set aside-
Whether the procedural safeguards enshrined under rule 9 of the Assam Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules 1964 had been complied with while i [LexDoc Id : 506319]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2016 |
Chhaganbhai Devabhai Baraiya vs Collector and Ors.
Entitlement to family pension and retirement benefits: Deceased permanent employee from date of her original appointment-Option for pension scheme given by deceased before her death, Denial of benefits arbitrary and illegal-
Whether the respondents could be directed to pay the benefit of family pension and other retirement benefits to the petitioner with interest. Held [LexDoc Id : 506317]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2016 |
Ajit M. Pujeri and Ors. vs Karnataka Power Transmission Corpn. Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 506530]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2016 |
Tanwir Alam and Ors. vs State of West Bengal and Ors.
Entitlement to receive marks: Teacher Training Course Certificate obtained before June 2005-Training course studied with institutes affiliated to NCTE, Petitioners entitled to receive appointment orders-
Whether the petitioners were entitled to receive 22 marks as per the West Bengal Primary School Teachers Recruitment Rules 2001 on the ground th [LexDoc Id : 506513]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Vinay Pratap Singh Chouhan and Ors. vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.
Reservation in posts for areas included in Tribal Sub Plan: All petitioners residents of Scheduled Area-Petitioners entitled for their consideration at the place applied for by respondents' own showing-
Whether the respondents could be directed to consider the cases of petitioners and allow them to participate in the further selection process. H [LexDoc Id : 506481]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2016 |
CIT vs Umicore Finance Luxemborg
Capital gains-Article 226 of Constitution of India, 1950. Non-resident company.-Whether, capital gains are liable to be paid or not in terms by transferee Company being a non resident Company, respondent, would be a matter which w [LexDoc Id : 506282]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Ashok Prapann Sharma vs CIT and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 530241]
|
SC |
2016 |
N. Prakasan vs CTO and Ors.
Penalty order-Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003. Payment of presumptive tax.-Petitioner challenged penalty order passed under Section 22(7) of Act. Whether, penalty order passed under Section 22(7) of Act liable to be set aside [LexDoc Id : 507007]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2016 |
Modi Revlon (P) Ltd. vs CIT
Excise refund-Claim-Whether Tribunal was justified in not permitting assessee to claim deduction of certain amount towards Central Excise refund during assessment year in [LexDoc Id : 506896]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2016 |
T. Venkatesh and Ors. vs Bangalore Turf Club Ltd.
Closure of department: Amount as per VRS 2001 already offered-No sufficient justification to extend the benefit of 2004 Scheme, Interest awarded by way of compensatory measure-
Whether non-interference with the award of labour court whereby the benefits were ordered to be paid to the workmen notionally on the basis of t [LexDoc Id : 506637]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2016 |
Modi Revlon (P) Ltd. vs CIT
Deduction-Section 41(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Central excise refund.-Whether Tribunal was justified in not permitting assessee to claim deduction of towards Central Excise refund during assessment year in question. Held [LexDoc Id : 506276]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2016 |
K. Nagu Thevan vs Teachers Recruitment Board and Ors.
Challenge to selection process: Meritorious performance of third and fourth respondent-Participation in selection process without any demur, Appeal dismissed-
Whether the challenge to the selection of third and fourth respondents was tenable. Held, the qualification wise, as per the eligible qualificat [LexDoc Id : 506116]
|
HC (Madras) |
2016 |
Mahavir Sthan Nyas Samiti and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.
Grant of exemption-Section 80G of Income-tax Act, 1961. Renewal.-Petitioner sought quashing of order of Commissioner, by which application of petitioner for renewal of grant of exemption under Section 80G of Act has [LexDoc Id : 506904]
|
HC (Patna) |
2016 |
Chordia Trading Corpn. vs ITO and Ors.
Net income-Section 80HHC of Income Tax Act,1961. Interest.-Whether, on facts and in circumstances of case, Tribunal was justified in holding that interest received is not income from business and it is income [LexDoc Id : 506605]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2016 |
Tvl. Srie Senthil Tex vs Assistant Commissioner (CT)
Reversal of Input Tax Credit-Section 19 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act. Denial of claim.-Petitioner challenged show cause notice wherein respondent proposed to reverse input tax credit claimed by petitioner on the ground that on cross veri [LexDoc Id : 506353]
|
HC (Madras) |
2016 |
Ramkisan and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 506326]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corpn. Division vs Govind Sambhaji Hanumante
Forfeiture of gratuity: Acts of respondent amounting to moral turpitude-Petitioner obliged to follow its circular before forfeiting gratuity, Impugned order set aside-
Whether the order directing the petitioner to pay gratuity to the respondent with interest was sustainable. Held, since the respondent had been [LexDoc Id : 506313]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Bee Gee Forge vs Assistant Commissioner (CT)
[LexDoc Id : 506307]
|
HC (Madras) |
2016 |
Chordia Trading Corpn. vs ITO and Ors
Net income-Section 80HHC of Income Tax Act, 1961. Entitlement of.-Tribunal held that interest received at Rs. 5,21,574/- is not income from business and it is income from other sources and that lending of funds of as [LexDoc Id : 506271]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2016 |
Suresh Chandra Mallick vs Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology and Ors.
Entitlement to pension: Option to switch over from CPF Scheme to Pension Scheme exercised-Continuance for 15 years under CPF Scheme, Realisation of mistake in giving option afterthought-
Whether the petitioner was entitled to pension under the Pension Scheme or the Contributory Provident Fund (CPF) Scheme. Held, admittedly the pe [LexDoc Id : 506239]
|
HC (Orissa) |
2016 |
M. Reeta Baby vs District Elementary Educational Officer and Ors.
Delay in approval of appointment: Appointment kept pending for 11 years without reason-Entitlement to salary from date of initial appointment as per Supreme Court's order-
Whether the respondents could be directed to approve the appointment of the petitioner as Secondary Grade Teacher and to disburse the salary to [LexDoc Id : 506120]
|
HC (Madras) |
2016 |
Bhadra Education Trust vs CIT
[LexDoc Id : 506067]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2016 |
Lal Bahadur Singh and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.
Prerequisites of valid application-Section 245C(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Search and Seizure.-Whether, application fulfilled requirements or prerequisites of valid application under Section 245C(1) of Act. Held, in present case petitioners had [LexDoc Id : 505923]
|
HC (Patna) |
2016 |
CIT vs Super Malls (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 506280]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Prahalada Varada Gururaj Itigi vs Vishveshwaraiah Technological University Jnan Sangama and Ors.
Grace marks-Applicability of rules-Petitioner got admitted to Bachelor of Engineering Course in second respondent-College and opted Electronics and Communication Branch in academic year [LexDoc Id : 506279]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2016 |
| |
| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| |
