| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 6202 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Amit Kumar Gupta vs Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd. and Ors.
Resignation from service: Resignation tendered with immediate effect-Prospective date to be read as one month after the date of resignation-
Whether the petitioner's resignation became valid and if so with effect from which date and whether the petitioner could have withdrawn his resi [LexDoc Id : 506501]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Chitra Sharma vs Airline Allied Services Ltd. and Ors.
Discontinuation of contractual employment-Petitioner having no sanctioned leave nor sanction applied for, Petition dismissed-
Whether a direction could be issued against the first respondent to continue the petitioner's contractual employment. Held, the petitioner was f [LexDoc Id : 506318]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Ian Peter Morris vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 530246]
|
SC |
2016 |
Shiv Shakti Flour Mills (P) Ltd. vs CIT
Transport subsidy-Revenue receipt-In impugned judgement transport subsidy was ordered to be treated as revenue receipt, taxable in hands of assesse. Whether on facts and circumstances [LexDoc Id : 507306]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2016 |
Rasid Lala vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 507303]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2016 |
Ratnesh Enterprises (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
Disallowance-Section 36(1)(iii) & Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Loan amount.-Whether ITAT was right in law in disallowing certain amount being interest paid to bank under Section 36(1)(iii) read with Sec. 37(1) of Act. Held, it [LexDoc Id : 506901]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2016 |
Rasid Lala vs ITO
Validity of Notice-Section 148 of Income-tax Act, 1961. Reopening of assessment.-Notice issued under Section 148 of Act to petitioner by respondent. Whether, issuance of notice for reopening of assessment under Section 148 of Act w [LexDoc Id : 506900]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2016 |
Krupesh Ghanshyambhai Thakkar vs DCIT
Validity of Notice-Section 147 & Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Reopening of assessment.-AO issued notice to petitioners under section 148 of Act for reopening of assessment in exercise of power under Section 147 of Act. Whether, AO was ju [LexDoc Id : 506614]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2016 |
P. Duraisami and Ors. vs State of Tamilnadu and Ors.
Prayer for appointment in regular time scale of pay: Petitioners possessing relevant qualification-Interim stay by tribunal, Other persons joining in regular pay, Directions issued-
Whether the respondents could be directed to appoint the petitioners as regular time scale of pay in forest watchers taking into account of thei [LexDoc Id : 506508]
|
HC (Madras) |
2016 |
Mahibur Rahamn vs UOI and Ors.
Penalty of dismissal from service: Charges framed under Border Security Force Act 1968-Findings based on meticulous appreciation of evidence on record, Petition dismissed-
Whether the order imposing the penalty of dismissal from service on the petitioner was valid. Held, the petitioner had been charged under sectio [LexDoc Id : 506506]
|
HC (Jammu and Kashmir) |
2016 |
Managing Committee of the Pinnacle School vs Directorate of Education and Ors.
Maintainability of appeal against an order in contempt proceedings-Subsequent order taken note of, Direction to implement subsequent order justified-
Whether an appeal under clause 10 of the Letters Patent against an order in contempt proceedings was maintainable. Held, such appeal was maintai [LexDoc Id : 506479]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
T.A.I. Pharma Ltd. vs Wockhardt Ltd.
Dismissal of notice of motion-Price of goods sold-Notice of Motion was taken out by appellants-defendants in suit filed by respondents-plaintiffs for seeking an order to refer dispute in suit to arbit [LexDoc Id : 506431]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
N. Sekar vs State of Tamil Nadu and Ors.
Exemption from writing Criminal Judicial Tests: Petitioner having graduation in law-Only 11 posts of Superintendent sanctioned, Persons senior to petitioner to be promoted-
Whether the petitioner could be exempted from writing Criminal Judicial Tests Part I and II on the grounds that he had acquired graduation in la [LexDoc Id : 506324]
|
HC (Madras) |
2016 |
Film Factory Workers Union and Ors. vs Govt. of India and Ors.
Adjustment of allowances: Settlements entered into between employer and employees-Circulars authorising recovery of advances and allowances paid to employees contrary to settlements-
Whether the action of respondents, whereby, the monies paid, in the form of allowances, were sought to be adjusted against terminal benefits, pa [LexDoc Id : 506320]
|
HC (Madras) |
2016 |
Bindeshwari Chaudhary vs State of Bihar and Ors.
Withholding of gratuity and pension: Finding of proved charge based on earlier inquiry report-Earlier report quashed, No basis to rely on that report and to award punishment-
Whether the high court was justified in allowing the respondent authorities to withhold of 50 percent of gratuity and 50 percent of pension of t [LexDoc Id : 505879]
|
SC |
2016 |
Zahoor Ahmed Akhoon vs Archaeological Survey of India
[LexDoc Id : 506593]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Vivek Singh and Ors. vs Mohan Singh Tomkiyal and Ors.
Entitlement of constables of PAC and IRB to be included in selection process: Merit as the criterion for selection-Promotional course undergone by a constable, Constables and head constables falling in different classes-
Whether constables belonging to the Provincial Armed Constabulary (PAC) and the Indian Reserve Battalion (IRB) were entitled to be included in t [LexDoc Id : 506592]
|
HC (Uttarakhand) |
2016 |
Vinod Malik and Ors. vs Delhi Energy Development Agency and Ors.
Penalty of dismissal from service: Possible and plausible view taken by inquiry officer-Articles of charge proved, Refusal of court to exercise extraordinary powers under article 226-
Whether imposition of penalty of dismissal on the petitioners along with a disqualification for future employment under the government, was sustai [LexDoc Id : 506517]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Than Singh vs UOI and Ors.
Dismissal order: Refusal to participate in departmental proceedings-Category of petitioner mentioned as Scheduled Tribe in service book, Genuineness thereof not disputed, Failure to rebut presumption-
Whether the order of dismissal could be interfered with. Held, due to non-supply of documents the petitioner had refused to participate in depar [LexDoc Id : 506515]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2016 |
Tejvinder Kaur Ahuja and Ors. vs M.D. Gupta and Ors.
Notional promotions: Binding effect of Recruitment Rules-Holding of competitive examination a mandatory requirement, Institute directed to carry out promotional exercise for relevant posts-
Whether the promotions, which had been given nearly 15 years' earlier, to the petitioners were illegal in the context of Recruitment Rules 1986. [LexDoc Id : 506514]
|
HC (Uttarakhand) |
2016 |
St. Marys School and Ors. vs Rajendra Pratap Singh and Ors.
Deemed continuation in service: Probationary period of three years-Petitioner working for over four years, No grave and exceptional circumstances to terminate service-
Whether the first respondent was deemed to be confirmed in the services with the petitioners (school) on completion of three years' period of prob [LexDoc Id : 506510]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Ved Prakash vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
Delhi School Education Act 1973: Benefit of re-employment-Re-employment up to 62 years of age not falling in the expression 'prescribed benefits' under section 10-
Whether the petitioner could get the benefit of re- employment up to the age of 62 years on the application of section 10 of the Delhi School Ed [LexDoc Id : 506480]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Shri Ranganathar Valves (P) Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner (CT)
Refund of input tax credit-Nature of dispute-Petitioner applications for refund of input tax credit had been rejected. Whether, respondent justified in rejected refund claim of petitioner. Held, [LexDoc Id : 506351]
|
HC (Madras) |
2016 |
K.C. Rakesh vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
Claim for interest on delayed payment of pensionary benefits-Claim denied earlier, Principles of res judicata and constructive res judicata applicable-
Whether the third respondent was liable to pay interest on delayed payment of pensionary or retirement benefits to the petitioner. Held, the pet [LexDoc Id : 506322]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
J. Mani Chetty vs State of Tamil Nadu and Ors.
Entitlement to pension: Petitioner putting in more than 10 years in service-Option under the Government Order not exercised, Respondents directed to consider petitioner's representation-
Whether the respondents could be directed to sanction and pay pension to the petitioner w.e.f. 01 January 1988. Held, the petitioner had been sele [LexDoc Id : 506321]
|
HC (Madras) |
2016 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
