| First | Prev | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 619 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
P. Swaroopa Rani vs M. Hari Narayana @ Hari Babu
[LexDoc Id : 335268]
|
SC |
2008 |
Jyoti Prakash Rai @ Jyoti Prakash vs State of Bihar
[LexDoc Id : 335263]
|
SC |
2008 |
Pratibha D. Gawas alias Pratibha Wankhede vs Devendra Gawas, Arti Gawas, Anant Gawas, Deepali Gawas, Tukaram Gawas, Supriya Gawas and State of Goa
[LexDoc Id : 365733]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Pradip Kumar Singh vs Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. and Ors.
Anil Prasad and Anr. vs State of Jharkhand and Ors.
Umesh Sharma vs Central Coalfields Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 350882]
|
HC (Jharkhand) |
2008 |
J.M. Arumugham vs State
[LexDoc Id : 470551]
|
HC (Madras) |
2008 |
J. Ramulu and G. Venkatesh vs State of Andhra Pradesh
[LexDoc Id : 334647]
|
SC |
2008 |
Goyal Enterprises vs State of Jharkhand and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 334643]
|
SC |
2008 |
Rajesh Kumar and Anr. vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
[LexDoc Id : 334617]
|
SC |
2008 |
Subodh Kaura and Anr. vs State of Haryana and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 334654]
|
SC |
2008 |
Central Bureau of Investigation vs K.M. Sharan
[LexDoc Id : 340514]
|
SC |
2008 |
Shaik Nagoor vs State of Andhra Pradesh
[LexDoc Id : 364776]
|
SC |
2008 |
Arun Kumar Gupta vs Directorate of Revenue Intelligence
[LexDoc Id : 359868]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2008 |
Employees State Insurance Corporation vs Shyam Bhatia and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 349354]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Sanjeev Gupta vs State Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi
[LexDoc Id : 352735]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2008 |
Goculdas Kashinath Naik vs State and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 351749]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Damu Datta Naik Karmali vs State and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 351579]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Shakun Moolchandani and Kabir .J. Moolchandani vs UOI
[LexDoc Id : 336082]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2008 |
Coldspot vs Naik Hotels and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 351581]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Aradhana Gupta and Anr. vs Ludhiana Colonizers (P) Ltd. and Ors.
Quashing of complaint-No prima facie violation of s.202 or s.273 of CrPC, Allegations in complaint not vague-The high court observed that it had been specifically mentioned that one of the complainants had appeared before the court and submitted affidavit whe [LexDoc Id : 345886]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2008 |
Ashok Sikka vs State
Criminal complaint against director-Cessation of director’s office-The criminal proceedings initiated against the petitioner-directors for non-payment of deposits on maturity and dishonour of cheque was unsustainable [LexDoc Id : 341574]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2008 |
Roy Joseph Creado and Ors. vs Sk. Tamisuddin and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 343310]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Vinay Bharat Ram and Anr. vs ROC (No. 1)
Offences by company: Determination of net profits-Complaint filed beyond the period of limitation-The provisions of s.629A of the Companies Act 1956 Act stated that where no specific penalty was provided elsewhere in the Act, the maximum punishment [LexDoc Id : 379130]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2008 |
Bhagwati Foods (P) Ltd. and Basudeo Gupta and Ors. vs ROC
Penal action under the Companies Act-Offence time-barred -The high court, after going through the facts and circumstances of the case, ruled that the Single Judge, by exercising his discretion under s.633(2), [LexDoc Id : 341571]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2008 |
CC vs A. Mohammed and Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal South Zonal Bench
Equivalence of adjudication proceedings with criminal proceedings-Exoneration by the court-Whether exoneration by the court will automatically entitile exoneration in adjudication proceedings
Exoneration of the accused under secti [LexDoc Id : 333793]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2008 |
Vinay Bharat Ram and Ors. vs ROC (No. 2)
Scheme sanctioned by court: Binding effect and statutory force-Scheme not alterable except with the sanction of court-A scheme sanctioned by the court did not operate as a mere agreement between the parties; it became binding on the company, the creditors and the shar [LexDoc Id : 378256]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2008 |
| |
| First | Prev | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | Next | Last |
| |
