| First | Prev | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 2943 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Uma Shankar Singh vs State of Bihar and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 394378]
|
SC |
2010 |
Syed Ashwaq Ahmed vs Jt. Secretary and Chief Passport Officer and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 394377]
|
SC |
2010 |
Shivamma vs Krishna Grameen Bank
[LexDoc Id : 441904]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2010 |
Kodali Raju and Ors. vs APSRTC and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 423267]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2010 |
Karnail Singh and Anr. vs Garja Singh and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 403743]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2010 |
Craig Allen Coates vs State and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 401926]
|
SC |
2010 |
Laxmi Marine vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 401287]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2010 |
Maya Devi (Dead) through L.Rs vs Raj Kumari Batra (Dead) through L.Rs and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 400973]
|
SC |
2010 |
V.K. Industrial Corpn. Ltd. vs UOI
Order of Settlement Commission: Non-implementation of refund order for eight months-Written request for rectification not bona fide and not grantable since notice of rectification not issued to petitioner, Grant of request for adjournment to cause substantial prejudice to petitioner-The petitioner sought refund of amount as ordered by the Settlement Commission since the order so passed had not been acted upon by the revenue. The h [LexDoc Id : 400610]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2010 |
Arogya Scan and Research Centre (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 399301]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2010 |
CC vs Shamshuddin M.A. Kadar
Confiscation of goods: Statement admitting goods smuggled and Indian currency as sale proceeds of such goods-Retraction of statement after one and half months an afterthought, Statement material piece of evidence against accused, Confiscation upheld-Search was conducted in a hotel whereby goods of foreign origin and also Indian currency of Rs.2,27,100/- were recovered from the hotel room. Since th [LexDoc Id : 395021]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2010 |
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. vs Lloyd Steel Industries Ltd., Electricity Ombudsman and Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum
[LexDoc Id : 394661]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2010 |
N.D. Rice Mills and Ors. vs Suraj Parkash Surinder Kumar and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 394390]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2010 |
Firoj Khan vs Lajwanti and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 394386]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2010 |
Ansal Properties and Industries (P) Ltd. vs Anoop Sarin
[LexDoc Id : 394385]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2010 |
Dharmarth Trust J and K Jammu and Ors. vs Dinesh Chander Nanda
[LexDoc Id : 394370]
|
SC |
2010 |
Sonalaxmi Machhimar Sahakari Soc. Ltd. vs State of Maharashtra, District Collector, Municipal Corpn. of Thane, Commissioner of Municipal Corpn. of Thane, Dy. Municipal Commissioner, Precision Fisheries and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 394353]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2010 |
Nand Kishore Gupta, J.S. Horticulture (P) Ltd., Balbir Singh and and Ors. vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 394275]
|
SC |
2010 |
Kranti Associates (P) Ltd. and Anr. vs Masood Ahmed Khan and Ors.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission: High-powered quasi-judicial forum for deciding lis between parties-Dismissal of revision petition by refusing to give reasons and affirming the order of State Commission improper-The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission had the trappings of a civil court and was a high-powered quasi-judicial forum for deciding lis be [LexDoc Id : 394274]
|
SC |
2010 |
Nitin Gunwant Shah vs Indian Bank and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 437119]
|
SC |
2010 |
Laddan Steel Ware Mfg. Ltd. vs CC
Raising of plea for first time before high court: Request for re-testing of material not accepted-No such plea made before tribunal, Raising of such plea for first time in instant appeal impermissible-The appellant had made a request for re-testing of the material, which was not accepted. However, no such plea was raised before the tribunal. When th [LexDoc Id : 424554]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
Soft Hosiery Mills vs CC and CE
Condonation of delay: Limitation-Power under article 226 not exercisable for waiving statutory limitation-When a statute prescribed limitation and also gave further time limit for condonation of delay and if such statutory authorities did not condone the d [LexDoc Id : 413808]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2010 |
Jayalakshmi vs Nair Service Society
Jurisdiction of Company Court-Company court not like a writ court-The company court was not a court of unlimited jurisdiction. Its jurisdiction was delineated by the provisions of the Companies Act 1956 under which i [LexDoc Id : 402620]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2010 |
Sambhav Enterprises and Bhawani Enterprises vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 399737]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2010 |
Mahavir Enterprises vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 399736]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2010 |
| |
| First | Prev | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | Next | Last |
| |
