| First | Prev | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 2943 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Umraoli vs Puran
[LexDoc Id : 394625]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2010 |
M. Chandra vs M. Thangamuthu and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 394512]
|
SC |
2010 |
Om Prakash vs G.P.Tiwari and Subhash Kumar Tiwari
[LexDoc Id : 394284]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
K.K. Poonacha vs State of Karnataka and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 394181]
|
SC |
2010 |
State of Haryana vs Satish Kumar Mittal and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 394180]
|
SC |
2010 |
Society for Unaided Private Schools of Rajasthan vs UOI and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 436641]
|
SC |
2010 |
Haldia Petrochemicals Ltd. vs CC
Non-availability of Double Member Bench at Kolkata: Inability to pursue remedy-Direction not to give effect to order directing confiscation of goods and imposing penalty till regular bench became available in Kolkata or till stay application proceeded with Double Member Bench whichever was earlier-The petitioner had prayed for a direction upon the respondents not to give effect or further effect to the order in original directing confiscation of [LexDoc Id : 405111]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2010 |
Commissioner, Commercial Tax vs Alka Restaurant
[LexDoc Id : 403933]
|
HC (Uttarakhand) |
2010 |
Assistant CC vs Prabhakar Shetty
Appeal against acquittal: Failure of prosecution to prove presence of accused when lorry intercepted beyond reasonable doubt-Mazahar not prepared, No specific reference to voluntary statements given by each of the accused, Sanction order not referring to place where lorry intercepted and contraband seized, According of sanction without application of mind not valid-In an appeal against acquittal, the high court noted that the presence of third and fourth accused when the lorry was intercepted had not been proved [LexDoc Id : 402159]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2010 |
Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 401253]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2010 |
Department of Customs vs Shyam Sunder
[LexDoc Id : 398139]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
Lan Eseda Industries Ltd. vs CC
Undervaluation of goods: Prices declared not the transactional value-Price of similar goods imported even higher, Deemed value higher than transaction value, Deemed value to get priority-The appellant had imported computers from a company in Hong Kong. The department, however, alleged that the goods were manufactured by another company [LexDoc Id : 396747]
|
SC |
2010 |
Sunil Gupta vs Polar Industries Ltd., Angelo Brothers Co. India Ltd. and Anil Aggarwal
[LexDoc Id : 394288]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
Budh Singh and Ors. vs Hakam Singh and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 394234]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2010 |
Baldev Singh and Ors. vs Gram Panchayat
[LexDoc Id : 394233]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2010 |
Anju Joshi vs Vikramjit and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 394232]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2010 |
Kalabharati Advertising vs Hemant Vimalnath Narichania and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 394177]
|
SC |
2010 |
Raj Kumar Bari and Ors. vs Shiv Rani and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 394153]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
J.K. Sawhney vs Punjab National Bank
[LexDoc Id : 394149]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
Nigam Kumar Walia vs Gulzar Singh and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 394117]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2010 |
Vijay Mittal, In re
[LexDoc Id : 422244]
|
GOI |
2010 |
CCE vs Fortune Filaments (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 401280]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2010 |
Ritu Agencies vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 399362]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2010 |
Samuel Benjamin Peters vs Hebron Schools Association, Executive Council of Hebron Schools Association and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 394559]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2010 |
Dahyabhai Vallabhai Patel vs Lalubhai Patel and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 394227]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2010 |
| |
| First | Prev | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | Next | Last |
| |
